Kennedy Assassination, no conspiracy when it’s documented

[CrusaderFrank]

Yes that was JFK and it was not the front of his head it was the side of his head

Whats hillarious is you thinking you know better, like you are smarter.

^ Warren Commission photo of JFK autopsy

 

[Soupnazi630]

^ Warren Commission photo of JFK autopsy

How would you know, you never read it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yes that was JFK and it was not the front of his head it was the side of his head

Whats hillarious is you thinking you know better, like you are smarter.

Who do you believe the Warren Commission or your lying eyes?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Who do you believe the Warren Commission or your lying eyes?

My eyes do not lie and I believe both.

That frame does not dispute the WC or support you

 

[BackAgain]

No it is not well known.

It is a siully claim you made up on your own because the photo proves you wrong

You do not see where it entered you see a part of a large gaping wound on the side of his head.

It is proven the wund entered from above and behind

It is well known to people who have studied it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is well known to people who have studied it.

No it is not

It is only claimed by you without a speck of evidence

You simply hate evidence proving your claim wrong

It is indoctored unaltered and proves you wrong deal with it

 

[BackAgain]

No it is not

It is only claimed by you without a speck of evidence

You simply hate evidence proving your claim wrong

It is indoctored unaltered and proves you wrong deal with it

Your “studies” have been one-sided.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Your “studies” have been one-sided.

No they really have not

Like many people i started out believing the conspiracy theories.

After decades of reading books and watching documentaries about them I read the other side of the story ( which you have not ).

The conspiracy theories have all been disproven. Not challenged or refuted or debunked but disproven

 

[BackAgain]

No they really have not

Like many people i started out believing the conspiracy theories.

After decades of reading books and watching documentaries about them I read the other side of the story ( which you have not ).

The conspiracy theories have all been disproven. Not challenged or refuted or debunked but disproven

Good for you. Disagreeing with you doesn’t make anyone else (or you) the “dumb” one.

But let’s settle down a bit and consider some points.

One piece of physical evidence which would make the headshot being fired from in front or from behind, is the piece of skull recovered the next day by some pre-Med student.

It was photographed and forensically analyzed. The analysis advised
The Warren Commission concluded that the fatal wound of entry was slightly above the occipital protuberance.

Yet, they used a drawing to show the wound of entry, instead, going through the upper parietal part of the President’s skull.

Why it matters:

There was allegedly some “beveling” of the interior portion of the “occipital” bone recovered the next day. If so, and assuming the bone came from the president’s skull, such beveling would establish the shot from behind. However, it was later discerned to be a PARIETAL bone fragment. This raises a concern that the bone fragment, allegedly recovered the next day, might not be from the President at all.

If it had been preserved, it could be subjected to DNA analysis. (At least Mitochondrial DNA.)

But the skull bone fragment went missing.

There are many other reasons to reject the WC conclusions. I’ll leave you with one: I had earlier suggested that the fatal head wound-of-entry was at the President’s hairline above his right eye.

What if an autopsy photo showed that wound? It might just be a clue as to whether it was, itself, relatively small suggesting a wound of entry shot from in front of President Kennedy?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Good for you. Disagreeing with you doesn’t make anyone else (or you) the “dumb” one.

But let’s settle down a bit and consider some points.

One piece of physical evidence which would make the headshot being fired from in front or from behind, is the piece of skull recovered the next day by some pre-Med student.

It was photographed and forensically analyzed. The analysis advised
The Warren Commission that the fatal wound of entry was slightly above the occipital protuberance.

Yet, they used a drawing to show the wound of entry, instead, going through the upper parietal part of the President’s skull.

Why it matters:

There was allegedly some “beveling” of the interior portion of the “occipital” bone recovered the next day. If so, and assuming the bone came from the president’s skull, such beveling would establish the shot from behind. However, it was later discerned to be a PARIETAL bone fragment. This raises a concern that the bone fragment, allegedly recovered the next day, might not be from the President at all.

If it had been preserved, it could be subjected to DNA analysis. (At least Mitochondrial DNA.)

But the skull bone fragment went missing.

There are many other reasons to reject the WC conclusions. I’ll leave you with one: I had earlier suggested that the fatal head wound-of-entry was at the President’s hairline above his right eye.

What if an autopsy photo showed that wound? It might just be a clue as to whether it was, itself, relatively small suggesting a wound of entry shot from in front of President Kennedy?

There was no piece of skull found by any med or pre med student and no advice of any sort given to the autopsy doctors

There was no wound of entry above his right eye

The entrance wound was in the back. It carved out the entire side of his skull and flaps of skin hung down above his eye but that is not an entrance wound.

There are no reasons you can name to reject the WCs conclusions. You would have named one by now and you havent

 

[BackAgain]

There was no piece of skull found by any med or pre med student and no advice of any sort given to the autopsy doctors

Oh. So the pre-med student didn’t exist and his name isn’t “Harper?” Interesting. You assume the mantle of some well read “expert.”

There was no wound of entry above his right eye

Denial is worth nothing.

That is a wound of ENTRY. Compare the smaller size of that wound to the damage from the area of exit.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oh. So the pre-med student didn’t exist and his name isn’t “Harper?” Interesting. You assume the mantle of some well read “expert.”

Denial is worth nothing.

View attachment 1189097

That is a wound of ENTRY. Compare the smaller size of that wound to the damage from the area of exit.

The story is bullshit anxd the proof is no skull fragment


That is NOT a wound of entry it is clearly part of the blown out side of the skull

It is in the area of exit and entrance wounds are not trianagular

I am denyiing your fairy tales and your lack of eye sight. There is nno way on earth any intelligent person would believe that ara on the skull is an entry wound.

You habve NOTHING

That is a massive massive failure for you

 

[BackAgain]

The story is bullshit anxd the proof is no skull fragment


That is NOT a wound of entry it is clearly part of the blown out side of the skull

It is in the area of exit and entrance wounds are not trianagular

I am denyiing your fairy tales and your lack of eye sight. There is nno way on earth any intelligent person would believe that ara on the skull is an entry wound.

You habve NOTHING

That is a massive massive failure for you

Your ignorance is showing. The skull fragment was logged in as well as photographed and analyzed. Somewhere along the line, however, it got lost or misfiled or stolen.

Here. Educate yourself:

The Harper Fragment: Does it Show Kennedy was Shot From the Front?

 

[candycorn]

Full blown Q-Anon stuff there....

 

[BackAgain]

Full blown Q-Anon stuff there....

No. It’s factual. That’s why a moron like you is so confused, candyass.

 

[candycorn]

No. It’s factual. That’s why a moron like you is so confused, candyass.

Ahh so the driver shot Kennedy this time? Consult with your other sock puppets and get back to us.

 

[BackAgain]

Ahh so the driver shot Kennedy this time?

Nope. I saw that claim and the related video. It simply didn’t happen.
So calm yourself down, you pathetic twit.

Consult with your other sock puppets and get back to us.

As you know, you stupid twatrash troll, I have no “socks.” You just keep saying it because you habitually lie.

Anyway, I don’t need to confer with anyone. Unlike you, I can read.

 

[candycorn]

Nope. I saw that claim and the related video. It simply didn’t happen.

Wow, you should tell your Q-anon brother he's a pathetic twit then....but you won't do that will you, *****?

So how many gunmen do you think were in Dallas on that day?

 

[BackAgain]

Wow, you should tell your Q-anon brother he's a pathetic twit then....but you won't do that will you, *****?

I don’t even know who the **** you’re babbling about. But it doesn’t matter. Anyone is free to believe what they wish even if the evidence for it is weak.

You know that and rely on it since your evidence is always weak when it exists at all.

So how many gunmen do you think were in Dallas on that day?

How the **** would I know? Jeez. You ask stupid questions.

But if one accepts that Lee Oswald didn’t fire all the shots attributed to him from the book depository, then there had to be at least one other shooter.

(And that “magic bullet” theory is so absurd that you need to believe in fantasy to buy it.)

 

[Soupnazi630]

Your ignorance is showing. The skull fragment was logged in as well as photographed and analyzed. Somewhere along the line, however, it got lost or misfiled or stolen.

Here. Educate yourself:

The Harper Fragment: Does it Show Kennedy was Shot From the Front?

It is non existet and proves nothing