Keith is BACK!!!

[daveman]

Current TV.

*snicker*

More people post on USMB than watch CT.

Then why are neonuts so threatened by him?

Because we might die laughing.

 

[Trajan]

he'll need help looking for his audience...

 

[boedicca]

I don't know any neonuts, so I have no idea if they are threatened by him.

He's irrelevant to my existence as I didn't watch him in the past and have no plans to watch him now or in the future.

 

[whitehall]

Current TV? Isn't that a network devoted to HIV positive viewers?

 

[NYcarbineer]

So, he's going to be on a cable station that even fewer people watch than CCCPNBC.

Only in Liberoidalville is that some kind of good news.

Most liberals know how to change the channel.

 

[Trajan]

I don't know any neonuts, so I have no idea if they are threatened by him.

He's irrelevant to my existence as I didn't watch him in the past and have no plans to watch him now or in the future.

well if you're of the mind hurry up, it won't last long.

 

[boedicca]

I'm surprised that Current TV hasn't gone bankrupt by now.

 

[daveman]

So, he's going to be on a cable station that even fewer people watch than CCCPNBC.

Only in Liberoidalville is that some kind of good news.

Most liberals know how to change the channel.

Then why do so many of them watch Fox News until the veins in their foreheads bulge? Why do they call for it to be shut down?

I'd say some of them don't know how to change the channel.

 

[Trajan]

So, he's going to be on a cable station that even fewer people watch than CCCPNBC.

Only in Liberoidalville is that some kind of good news.

Most liberals know how to change the channel.

we already know their attention span is infinitesimal, now if you only knew how to change your minds....we'd be getting somewhere.

 

[Trajan]

I'm surprised that Current TV hasn't gone bankrupt by now.

2 words ( or if you're Biden 4), 'carbon credits'....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What? only a retard would want Bush back.

It’s not GWB they want back, this ‘back’ is more like ca 1800.

 

[daveman]

What? only a retard would want Bush back.

It’s not GWB they want back, this ‘back’ is more like ca 1800.

Really? Progressives want the US to "progress" to the condition of the USSR circa 1958.

 

[oldsalt]

For all you claiming otherwise...you're here on this thread.

 

[Truthseeker420]

What? only a retard would want Bush back.

It’s not GWB they want back, this ‘back’ is more like ca 1800.

Really? Progressives want the US to "progress" to the condition of the USSR circa 1958.

But more progressive/ liberal countries are kicking our ass in standard of living.


Liberal Countries and Conservative Countries:


Extreme Liberal Countries: Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland.

Very Liberal Countries: Canada, England, New Zealand, France, Germany.

Very Conservative Countries: The United States of America.

Extreme Conservative Countries: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq.


The 2010 Human Development Report was also the first to calculate an Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (main article), which factors in inequalities in the three basic dimensions of human development (income, life expectancy, and education). Below is the list of the "Very High Development" countries under this index.[9] The green arrows (), red arrows (), and blue dashes () represent changes in rank when compared to the 2010 HDI.

1. Norway 0.876 ()
2. Australia 0.864 ()
3. Sweden 0.824 ( 6)
4. Netherlands 0.818 ( 3)
5. Germany 0.814 ( 5)
6. Switzerland 0.813 ( 7)
7. Ireland 0.813 ( 2)
8. Canada 0.812 ()
9. Iceland 0.811 ( 8)
10. Denmark 0.810 ( 9)
11. Finland 0.806 ( 5)
12. United States 0.799 ( 8)
13. Belgium 0.794 ( 5)
14. France 0.792 ()
15. Czech Republic 0.790 ( 13)
16. Austria 0.787 ( 9)
17. Spain 0.779 ( 3)
18. Luxembourg 0.775 ( 6)
19. Slovenia 0.771 ( 10)
20. Greece 0.768 ( 2)
21. United Kingdom 0.766 ( 5)
22. Slovakia 0.764 ( 9)
23. Israel 0.763 ( 8)
24. Italy 0.752 ( 1)
25. Hungary 0.736 ( 11)
26. Estonia 0.733 ( 8)
27. South Korea 0.731 ( 15)
28. Cyprus 0.716 ( 7)
29. Poland 0.709 ( 11)
30. Portugal 0.700 ( 10)

 

[hortysir]

How representative is it of our culture that people are excited to see the return of a news anchor with such an obvious political leaning.
What ever happened to getting news in the format of "just the facts"?
The only time you can get news that's not slanted *so much* is approx. 2-4pm on CNN or FOX unless you're constantly surfing AP or Reuters' sites.
Any time before or after that and it's all obviously slanted.

 

[percysunshine]

An 'Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index'?

Talk about the oxymoron of all oxymorons.

 

[Zander]

Good for him. He went from a show that averaged a paltry 200,000 viewers a night to dying Network that only has 18,000 viewers a night- that's for the entire network!! Winning, dah!!!

 

[Liberty]

What? only a retard would want Bush back.

It’s not GWB they want back, this ‘back’ is more like ca 1800.

a time without 14 trillion debt...i know it sounds like hell to socialist fucks like yourself.

Also, you put the bill of rights as your avatar but I bet you don't realize the irony. The bill of rights was added to the constitution after it's initial drafting because the anti-federalists (you know, the states rights folks) were scared of the power of the proposed federal government. Go figure right? Read a book you are embarrassing yourself.

 

[Dr.House]

Who?

A tool...

 

[Dr.House]

So, he's going to be on a cable station that even fewer people watch than CCCPNBC.

Only in Liberoidalville is that some kind of good news.

Most liberals know how to change the channel.

So why do you spend most of it watching FoxNews?

I think you may be overestimating the ability of your average liberal....