Keeping ICE away from polling places a top priority for Democrats

Standing around and filming ICE is not interfering but they will initiate violence for attempting to do so regardless.
Attempting to run over an ICE agent in the performance of his duty is not 'filming'. Try again moron.
And that’s nothing to say of the joy they take in trying to kill innocent citizens.
Interfere with your local police while they are arresting a suspected criminal and see what happens to you---PLEASE!
 
If it were fat white people being carted off they would understand.
Where is your proof of these wild-assed assertions?

Show us detailed incidents of US citizens being detained. White6 can't do that. Can you?

You are both deeply infected with TDS. Maybe that is causing theses delusions.
 
Attempting to run over an ICE agent in the performance of his duty is not 'filming'. Try again moron.
Who said anything about running over ICE agents? You’re hearing voices.

Interfere with your local police while they are arresting a suspected criminal and see what happens to you---PLEASE!
ICE arrests citizens who are minorities because they convince themselves they’re criminals, which is totally unconstitutional.

They also enjoy shooting citizens and then lying about it to cover up the fact that the citizen they shot didn’t do anything wrong.

After they shoot innocent civilians, they text each other congratulating them and bragging about how awesome it was.

ICE employs a lot of psychopaths. No wonder you freaks love them so much.
 
Why do you believe a US citizen has reason be intimidated by the presence of ICE agents?
ICE " was " a professional non-political force in the past. trump has changed all that.. trump considers Democrats as the enemy. trump lowered the professional standards so they could hire Jan 6th. Militia members who are not professional , nor that well educated. They are loyal to trump. ,not the US. Hopefully you can put two and two together.
 
If you don't like that I protest the tactics of the fascist masked goon squads, let them get rid of the masks, go back to warrants signed by judges for entering and searching, and figure out how to read and identify driver's licenses and passport, proving citizenship, and quit shooting Americans. Some Americans do survive the assault of the Goon Squads, such as:
Marimar Martinez, who was shot five times by a Border Patrol agent, faced initial charges that were later dropped after body camera footage contradicted the officers' claims about the incident. The evidence revealed that the agent's actions did not align with the narrative provided by the government, leading to the dismissal of the case against her.

NBC News
Wikipedia
So you have one bad ICE agent, who committed a crime, so you think they all do this as a matter of policy? Good God man, seek some psychiatric help before you become a burden to those around you.

BTW, what is the status of the ICE agent who shot her?
 
There have been multiple reports of U.S. citizens being wrongfully arrested by ICE despite presenting valid identification or proof of citizenship, such as birth certificates or passports. These incidents highlight concerns about ICE's enforcement practices and the agency's failure to verify citizenship claims adequately.
PBS U.S. House of Representatives
Overview of ICE Arrests of U.S. Citizens

Reports indicate that U.S. citizens have been wrongfully arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) despite presenting valid identification or proof of citizenship. These incidents have raised significant concerns about the enforcement practices of ICE.

Notable Cases


Case Examples


Case DescriptionOutcome
A U.S. citizen in Florida was arrested despite showing a birth certificate and state ID. Charges were dropped after media attention.Released after 48 hours in custody.
In Minneapolis, a citizen was held for hours after refusing to show ID, despite being a U.S. citizen.Encounter escalated with aggressive tactics from officers.
Reports of citizens being detained for extended periods without verification of their citizenship claims.Some were held for over a week without legal recourse.

ICE Policies and Practices


ICE is legally prohibited from detaining U.S. citizens. However, there have been numerous reports of agents ignoring citizenship claims and failing to verify documentation. This has led to wrongful arrests and, in some cases, deportations of U.S. citizens, including children.


You could have found this, yourself if you bothered to read anything but right wing radical dribble that passes for news. Remember, The Internet Is Not Just For Message Boards and Porn Tubes Anymore. Thinking people use it for research news and actual understanding of current events. But, I guess the last time you researched anything was for your Highschool Senior Term Paper.
Have those arrested filed suit for unlawful detainment?
 
Anyone not Southern Cracker is at risk, and that's the point. Trump will send in his SturmTruppen to suppress the vote in Dem blue areas. You know it. You want it. Jim Crow 2.0.
How do you suppress citizens from voting? Why should anyone be intimidated unless they are an illegal?
 
I do not hate LEO. I get along quite well, especially local police and many Tennessee Highway Patrol, just as I do with some of the local judges that know me, whether meeting as fellow NG Officers, studying under them in college, or serving on multiple criminal court juries.

ICE is on my shit list, though, as I do not agree with the manner they have been going about their job. I do not approve their treatment of actual American Citizens, nor their lies, proven false due by their actions being caught on video, belying their false charges, then attempting to justify their own actions attacking American Citizens, false charges dismissed or not. They are not worthy of trust as normal LEO are entitled to. They are to be avoided, by all, and shunned, in general, as a danger to the people of the United States. Trump may have gotten rid of their boss, "Dog Killer Noem" due to the bad press generated by their actions and hers, but it is unclear whether we will see actual change in how the people of ICE carry out their mission, going forth.
Yet you have provided exactly zero evidence that this occurs. How very liberal of you to make up your mind before thinking!
 
Who said anything about running over ICE agents? You’re hearing voices.
Review your post that I replied to, moron. Once again you aren't keeping up with what you post as you intimated that these protestors are only filming--Good was not filming. She attempted to kill an ICE agent. STFU, your BS doesn't fly.
They also enjoy shooting citizens and then lying about it to cover up the fact that the citizen they shot didn’t do anything wrong.
Your paid protestor's own videos prove your assertion false, once again, LIAR.
After they shoot innocent civilians, they text each other congratulating them and bragging about how awesome it was.
Linkie. Neither Good nor Pretti were innocent. They both violently interfered with lawful immigration enforcement.
ICE employs a lot of psychopaths.
Linkie, LIAR.
 
In the context of the federal law (18 U.S. Code § 592) mentioned earlier, the phrase "person in the civil, military, or naval service" refers to the two main branches of federal employment:


1. Civil Service (The "Civil" Part)​


This refers to the civilian workforce of the federal government. These are employees who work for federal agencies but are not active-duty military members.


  • Examples: Agents from the FBI, DHS, ICE, or any other federal administrative department.
  • The Rule: The law says these civilian federal officials cannot use their authority to bring "armed men" or troops to a polling place.




2. Military and Naval Service​


This refers to the Armed Forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, and Coast Guard).


  • The Rule: Officers in these branches are strictly prohibited from stationing troops at polling stations.




Why the distinction matters​


The law is written this way to cover everyone who works for the federal government, whether they wear a military uniform or a suit. It ensures that:


  • The President (as Commander-in-Chief) cannot send the military.
  • Federal Department Heads (like the Secretary of Homeland Security) cannot send armed federal agents.

Is "Civil Military" a single group?​


Usually, when people say "Civil-Military," they are talking about Civil-Military Relations—the principle that the military must always stay under the control of elected civilian leaders (like the President and Congress) rather than running the country themselves.


In the specific law you asked about, "civil" and "military" are listed separately to make sure no federal employee, regardless of their department, interferes with an election.


Local police are not part of the "federal civil service," which is why they are governed by state laws instead of these specific federal restrictions.


Cornell University | Search Pages



  1. LII
  2. U.S. Code
  3. Title 18
  4. PART I
  5. CHAPTER 29
  6. § 592

Quick search by citation:
Title
Section

18 U.S. Code § 592 - Troops at polls​

prev | next
Whoever, being an officer of the Army or Navy, or other person in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, orders, brings, keeps, or has under his authority or control any troops or armed men at any place where a general or special election is held, unless such force be necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; and be disqualified from holding any office of honor, profit, or trust under the United States.

This section shall not prevent any officer or member of the armed forces of the United States from exercising the right of suffrage in any election district to which he may belong, if otherwise qualified according to the laws of the State in which he offers to vote.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 719; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Doesn’t say what you posted earlier
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom