Kari Lake loses signature verification case

[jc456]

False, Election Officials testified that signatures were looked at.

WW

that's hysterical. No they didn't. no one can scan a signature in two seconds. I'd love to see someone actually do it.

 

[jc456]

Oh, to answer your first question.

She got fewer votes.

WW

yep because hundred thousand illegal signature ballots were counted. We know. It's why it went to trial.

 

[leftwinger]

Yeah, just a 2.3% GDP growth when COVID hit, and that's WITH TRILLIONS of help from the Fed. And he BEGGED them for even MORE.

Not to mention an extended manufacturing recession in 2019, a collapsed bond market and MASSIVE spending increases to goose the economy.

Mediocre at best. You just believe the orange bullshit.

Steady Real growth. Not phony stimulus growth into Commee BS wish lists and union bailouts you ignorant phony worthless sack of rotten fruit.

 

[Lastamender]

False. I make fun of you for being nuts.

A liar calling someone crazy does not have the effect you think it does.

 

[Mac1958]

Steady Real growth. Not phony stimulus growth into Commee BS wish lists and union bailouts you ignorant phony worthless sack of rotten fruit.

So you don't realize that the TRILLIONS in Fed stimulus was stimulus. Typical.

And Trump BEGGED the Fed for even MORE.

Good gawd, you people are aggressively ignorant.

 

[Lastamender]

So you don't realize that the TRILLIONS in Fed stimulus was stimulus. Typical.

And Trump BEGGED the Fed for even MORE.

Good gawd, you people are aggressively ignorant.

And you are ignorant of open borders, inflation, billions wasted on Ukraine and rampant crime? No need to answer hack.

 

[leftwinger]

So you don't realize that the TRILLIONS in Fed stimulus was stimulus. Typical.

And Trump BEGGED the Fed for even MORE.

Good gawd, you people are aggressively ignorant.

GOVT picking winners and losers to funnel my money into is NOT private industry and job growth. Like Obiden 1.0 and now Obiden 2.0 you tomato balled loon.

 

[Faun]

it's an open ballot and we know demfks will use them. one doesn't want to vote a demfk will take care of it for you. Just know that.

That's odd given all these people did just that in 2020 but none of them are Democrats...

• Cheryl Hall

• Terri Lynn Rote

• Donald Hartle

• Robert Richard Lynn

• Bruce Bartman

• Edward Snodgrass

• Tracey Kay McKee

• Ralph Thurman

• Alex Campbell

• Jonathan Meade West Sr.

• Charles Barnes

• Jay Ketcik

• Joan Halstead

• Barry Morphew

• Frederick Gattuso

• Francis Presto

• Kimberly McPherson

• Timothy Aaron Metz

 

[Faun]

A liar calling someone crazy does not have the effect you think it does.

Suuure, FruitLoops. Uh-huh.

 

[Lastamender]

Suuure, FruitLoops. Uh-huh.

You are the one that is seeing no results.

 

[WorldWatcher]

that's hysterical. No they didn't. no one can scan a signature in two seconds. I'd love to see someone actually do it.

#1 If you had watched the trial and listened to the testimony, you would be aware that each batch was "clicked through" twice. Once to compare signatures and after the first run through a second pass was made of the 250 ballot batch NOT to compare signatures but to ensure each record was assigned the accepted or review status (to send it to Level 2). That means 1/2 of the clicks had nothing to do with (a) signature comparison, and (b) were made very quickly to move through the status review.

#2 Secondly the Level 1 and Level 2 people were not doing a legal analysis of the signature to determine forgery. The legal stand was (a) a comparison, and (b) was is consistent. That was it.

#3 The under 2 second end results were only about 70,000 out of 1.4 million. And yes a trained person with a computer setup to display the security envelope signature and recent election record signature can determine very quickly that the signatures are consistent.

The interaction and interfacing of humans and machines is actually a fascinating area of study. I got some of it in my Industrial Technology program as it pertains to motion and time study.
.
.
.
.
.
Personally I'd like to see the human element taken mostly out of that portion of the security review (and it is only one portion). Computer software could be used to compare the signature of the security envelope with file signatures much more quickly then a human operator. For those that are then flagged as inconsistent, they would then be spit out to Level 2 review by a non-patrician team of 3 (2 of 3 required to approve a ballot) trained individuals.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

yep because hundred thousand illegal signature ballots were counted. We know. It's why it went to trial.

Then maybe Lake should have presented some of those hundred thousand illegal signatures to the court. Lakes own expert witness (Erich Speckin) testified that he was not able to show a signal signature from a security envelope that was fraudulent.

WW

 

[Lastamender]

Then maybe Lake should have presented some of those hundred thousand illegal signatures to the court. Lakes own expert witness (Erich Speckin) testified that he was not able to show a signal signature from a security envelope that was fraudulent.

WW

Did they let him look at any?

 

[Faun]

You are the one that is seeing no results.

I'm not, huh?

Who's the current president of the United States?

 

[Lastamender]

I'm not, huh?

Who's the current president of the United States?

The current illegitimate president is Biden.

 

[Care4all]

that's hysterical. No they didn't. no one can scan a signature in two seconds. I'd love to see someone actually do it.

court ruled it could.

the ones that match are quickly recognized, the ones that immediately do not, get moved to the auditors who check closer, and approve or disapprove, if disapproved it immediately gets sent to third set of signature auditors, who approve or disapprove...who then have people notify the voter that their signature did not match the file and for their vote to count, they have to come in to their election office, with ID and CURE their signature, within 7 days for most states.

AND before a Ballot is mailed to a voter, the voter had to request a ballot individually and where to send it, and the voter has to be a legal, registered voter....many states have tracking, where the voter can follow the ballot being mailed to them, and track the ballot mailed by them, to see if the election office received it!

 

[Lastamender]

court ruled it could.

the ones that match are quickly recognized, the ones that immediately do not, get moved to the auditors who check closer, and approve or disapprove, if disapproved it immediately gets sent to third set of signature auditors, who approve of disapprove...who then have people notify the voter that their signature did not match the file and for their vote to count, they have to come in to their election office, with ID and CURE their signature.

AND before a Ballot is mailed to a voter, the voter had to request a ballot individually and where to send it, and the voter has to be a legal, registered voter....many states have tracking, where the voter can follow the ballot being mailed to them, and track the ballot mailed by them, to see if the election office received it!

The court is corrupt. When there is no justice it does no good to act like there is. It is obvious.

 

[Billo_Really]

You will have to kill her. The people you support are more than capable to do just that.

I'm sorry, I'm on the left. We don't have militia's.

 

[Billo_Really]

nope. she will appeal.

You need evidence for that.

 

[Faun]

The current illegitimate president is Biden.