gee, nobody has ever accidentally typed the wrong homophone before. especially not when using a phone to post.and their cutting about 1% of school days.the $190K is 0.9% of the budget.
Hmmm, a product of our school system.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
gee, nobody has ever accidentally typed the wrong homophone before. especially not when using a phone to post.and their cutting about 1% of school days.the $190K is 0.9% of the budget.
Hmmm, a product of our school system.
Do you prepare the fries differently for Pacific Islanders at the Mickey D's you work at?No. We want our children taught skills that they will need after graduation.be honest - you're not fighting indoctrination, or at least most people aren't - they just want their own indoctrination taught.We ARE fighting for the kids. We are trying to force school districts to teach instead of indoctrinate. Spend money, but spend it on things that will make graduates attractive to employers.Keep fighting for them kids ya hear, they'll be ditch diggers before you know it. And while you applaud cutting their funding you can also complain about how dumb the kids are almost like one has nothing to do with the other.
Isnt cause and effect great?
If I want to hire an engineer OR a burger flipper, I really don't care if he has been taught multiculturalism.
Mostly, I want him to know how to read, write and do math. Oh! and use apostrophes.
I guess being aware of other cultures wont help you in the real world huh
Total bullshit!Conservative dogma: only those who can afford an education should have an education; those who fail to work hard to afford an education should simply do without, expecting no help from the state.
You really think extra money goes towards the kids? Dream on.
You're right, what good would it do the kids to be attending school anyway? Great point...Kids arent affected by the schools budget being cut. Books are free!
Sen. Steve Abrams, an Arkansas City Republican and chairman of the Senate Education Committee, revealed Senate Bill 294 as the annual session grinds through its final weeks. It would create a six-district pilot program for funding K-12 schools that would be expanded to as many as 106 districts in the second year, and all districts in the third year, as a block-grant mechanism of distributing state aid expires.
Inaugural districts in the Abrams plan would be Concordia, McPherson, Marysville, Hugoton, Blue Valley and Kansas City, Kan. — the same six districts already designated in state law as “innovative” districts exempt from many state laws and regulations governing management of public schools.
Senate panel checks pulse on new school finance plan CJOnline.com
^^^^that is what I see.
I also see standardized tests that lead nowhere but pay beau-coup cash. Yet, I don't find too many democrats that are willing to go up against that. I see a lot of whining by the Democrats but they have zip problems with the hedge fund run charter schools. I see unlicensed teachers and bewilderment of what happened to the middle class.
Nobody is taking me for a ride.
Do you not see, they are playing you like a fiddle. Let's claim poverty, even though noone has suffered, so they will give us what we want.
You watch enough public budget hearings, they sound like cry babies.Let's see, this I could find it's from 2013
Kansas opts to create its own Common Core tests CJOnline.com
Ah, but they want to drop the license:
Kan. schools Real problems need real solutions Hays Post
And there is more to the finances:
Senate panel checks pulse on new school finance plan CJOnline.com
I also noticed that they spent a million on drug testing for welfare recipients.
Conservative dogma: only those who can afford an education should have an education; those who fail to work hard to afford an education should simply do without, expecting no help from the state.
I'm betting that each district would barely notice a 5% cut in their education budget. If they would commit to that, most any fairly well off, tax paying citizen would fund the shortfall this year at zero interest.well for one, they don't get to just 'cut' things during the school year. there probably is some fat to be cut, but is there enough between now and the end of the school year? probably not.Except for the "study" quip, what's unjustified?well there's a whole bunch of unjustified bullshit.How much does the Superintendent make?
Let's see some of the salaries and benefits packages. Let me see where the money is going. A school district loses $190,000 in funding and they will cut days from the calender instead of fat from the budget? I bet the "study" to make the decision to close early cost $150,000.
Scan over the budget synopsis I linked. Don't you think they could find $190K if that was the goal instead of trying to make the Governor look like an evil ogre?
of course, it's not like kansas has been meeting it's funding requirements for a while now, so there may not be that much 'fat' to trim.
Huh?We ARE fighting for the kids. We are trying to force school districts to teach instead of indoctrinate. Spend money, but spend it on things that will make graduates attractive to employers.I think kids and school boards need to learn how to live within their means.I think this is ok, our kids need to learn with less so that we can give tax cuts to the rich and other more important things than education and kids
Keep fighting for them kids ya hear, they'll be ditch diggers before you know it. And while you applaud cutting their funding you can also complain about how dumb the kids are almost like one has nothing to do with the other.
Isnt cause and effect great?
If I want to hire an engineer OR a burger flipper, I really don't care if he has been taught multiculturalism.
Mostly, I want him to know how to read, write and do math. Oh! and use apostrophes.
Yes, you do. You want multiculturalism in the schools. You want it on the job.
Multiculturalism increases graduation rates.
Glad you aren't . That actually sounds like a decent new funding plan. I will be intrested to see how it looks in a few years.You really think extra money goes towards the kids? Dream on.
You're right, what good would it do the kids to be attending school anyway? Great point...Kids arent affected by the schools budget being cut. Books are free!Sen. Steve Abrams, an Arkansas City Republican and chairman of the Senate Education Committee, revealed Senate Bill 294 as the annual session grinds through its final weeks. It would create a six-district pilot program for funding K-12 schools that would be expanded to as many as 106 districts in the second year, and all districts in the third year, as a block-grant mechanism of distributing state aid expires.
Inaugural districts in the Abrams plan would be Concordia, McPherson, Marysville, Hugoton, Blue Valley and Kansas City, Kan. — the same six districts already designated in state law as “innovative” districts exempt from many state laws and regulations governing management of public schools.
Senate panel checks pulse on new school finance plan CJOnline.com
^^^^that is what I see.
I also see standardized tests that lead nowhere but pay beau-coup cash. Yet, I don't find too many democrats that are willing to go up against that. I see a lot of whining by the Democrats but they have zip problems with the hedge fund run charter schools. I see unlicensed teachers and bewilderment of what happened to the middle class.
Nobody is taking me for a ride.
Do you not see, they are playing you like a fiddle. Let's claim poverty, even though noone has suffered, so they will give us what we want.
You watch enough public budget hearings, they sound like cry babies.Let's see, this I could find it's from 2013
Kansas opts to create its own Common Core tests CJOnline.com
Ah, but they want to drop the license:
Kan. schools Real problems need real solutions Hays Post
And there is more to the finances:
Senate panel checks pulse on new school finance plan CJOnline.com
I also noticed that they spent a million on drug testing for welfare recipients.
Glad you aren't . That actually sounds like a decent new funding plan. I will be intrested to see how it looks in a few years.You really think extra money goes towards the kids? Dream on.
You're right, what good would it do the kids to be attending school anyway? Great point...Kids arent affected by the schools budget being cut. Books are free!Sen. Steve Abrams, an Arkansas City Republican and chairman of the Senate Education Committee, revealed Senate Bill 294 as the annual session grinds through its final weeks. It would create a six-district pilot program for funding K-12 schools that would be expanded to as many as 106 districts in the second year, and all districts in the third year, as a block-grant mechanism of distributing state aid expires.
Inaugural districts in the Abrams plan would be Concordia, McPherson, Marysville, Hugoton, Blue Valley and Kansas City, Kan. — the same six districts already designated in state law as “innovative” districts exempt from many state laws and regulations governing management of public schools.
Senate panel checks pulse on new school finance plan CJOnline.com
^^^^that is what I see.
I also see standardized tests that lead nowhere but pay beau-coup cash. Yet, I don't find too many democrats that are willing to go up against that. I see a lot of whining by the Democrats but they have zip problems with the hedge fund run charter schools. I see unlicensed teachers and bewilderment of what happened to the middle class.
Nobody is taking me for a ride.
Do you not see, they are playing you like a fiddle. Let's claim poverty, even though noone has suffered, so they will give us what we want.
You watch enough public budget hearings, they sound like cry babies.Let's see, this I could find it's from 2013
Kansas opts to create its own Common Core tests CJOnline.com
Ah, but they want to drop the license:
Kan. schools Real problems need real solutions Hays Post
And there is more to the finances:
Senate panel checks pulse on new school finance plan CJOnline.com
I also noticed that they spent a million on drug testing for welfare recipients.
How so?
Rather than concentrating on testing.
Rather than concentrating on testing.
Do you see any weaknesses in it?
I was talking dietary restrictions, but you missed the point.
I am an excellent cook. As for multiculturalism, it wasn't taught when I went to school. I learned things like reading, math, history, civics and grammar; you know, things that I could use in the real world.
I'm betting that each district would barely notice a 5% cut in their education budget. If they would commit to that, most any fairly well off, tax paying citizen would fund the shortfall this year at zero interest.well for one, they don't get to just 'cut' things during the school year. there probably is some fat to be cut, but is there enough between now and the end of the school year? probably not.Except for the "study" quip, what's unjustified?well there's a whole bunch of unjustified bullshit.How much does the Superintendent make?
Let's see some of the salaries and benefits packages. Let me see where the money is going. A school district loses $190,000 in funding and they will cut days from the calender instead of fat from the budget? I bet the "study" to make the decision to close early cost $150,000.
Scan over the budget synopsis I linked. Don't you think they could find $190K if that was the goal instead of trying to make the Governor look like an evil ogre?
of course, it's not like kansas has been meeting it's funding requirements for a while now, so there may not be that much 'fat' to trim.
No more so than funding based on scores. A different approach that seems worth exploring. It sounds like some of the school districts are interested in it as well.Rather than concentrating on testing.
Do you see any weaknesses in it?
No more so than funding based on scores. A different approach that seems worth exploring. It sounds like some of the school districts are interested in it as well.Rather than concentrating on testing.
Do you see any weaknesses in it?
Just so we are clear, you are in favor of tying the success of schools to how successful someone is after they graduate from high school? And there is no weakness in this?
I would really like to understand your reasoning behind this.