slackjawed
Self deported
Quote: Originally Posted by DiveCon View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Fizz View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Terral View Post
Okay hotshot: I have already shown everyone that the 911CR (like the ACAAR) omits the term "explosions," as both bogus documents use the singular term (explosion) exactly six (6) times (#10). Perhaps my distinguished debating adversary lacks the appropriate number of brain cells to understand the ramifications what what this means (Inside Job!!!!). Perhaps you can understand this point that proves beyond all doubt that the 911CR is BOGUS!!!
so let me get this straight......
the word "explosion" doesnt appear in the 9/11 commision report. there is no proof that explosives were used at any time. therefore it is an inside job?
fucking hell, thats really FUCKING NUTS!!!! Hahahahahahahah
wait a second. the word "kangaroo" doesnt appear in the 9/11 commission report either. does that prove that the Aussies were in on it too?!!
it must
Then we should start calling them 'kangaroofers'.
Quote: Originally Posted by Fizz View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Terral View Post
Okay hotshot: I have already shown everyone that the 911CR (like the ACAAR) omits the term "explosions," as both bogus documents use the singular term (explosion) exactly six (6) times (#10). Perhaps my distinguished debating adversary lacks the appropriate number of brain cells to understand the ramifications what what this means (Inside Job!!!!). Perhaps you can understand this point that proves beyond all doubt that the 911CR is BOGUS!!!
so let me get this straight......
the word "explosion" doesnt appear in the 9/11 commision report. there is no proof that explosives were used at any time. therefore it is an inside job?
fucking hell, thats really FUCKING NUTS!!!! Hahahahahahahah
wait a second. the word "kangaroo" doesnt appear in the 9/11 commission report either. does that prove that the Aussies were in on it too?!!
it must
Then we should start calling them 'kangaroofers'.
