Kamala Wants Price Controls on Groceries, Venezuelan-Style

…or Harris, who is putting forth ridiculous, harmful policies with the hope that she fails on all of them?
They are not even policies. More like.....teasers to get you to vote for her knowing full good and well she'lll never deliver.

The powercrats in Washington are disgusting.
 
They are not even policies. More like.....teasers to get you to vote for her knowing full good and well she'lll never deliver.

The powercrats in Washington are disgusting.
IKR? And these idiots who are going to vote for her despite her damaging proposals justify their vote by saying she won’t be able to get them through.

I know someone like that IRL. When I asked her how she can vote for someone whose proposals would bring down this country, she told me that the Republicans in Congress would stop her. So I then asked if she would vote for the Republican running for Congress, and she said ā€œoh no….i could never vote for a Republican.ā€

So she’s going to vote for the person whose policies would bring down the country with the hope that OTHER people will negate her vote. This is how crazy Democrats have become!
 
And these idiots who are going to vote for her despite her damaging proposals justify their vote by saying she won’t be able to get them through.
That moron John Edgar Slower than Horse is claiming they don't see it that way.

They'll vote for Satan before they vote Trump. That is why his (Satan's) Downs syndrome child is at the top of the Democratic ticket.
 
That moron John Edgar Slower than Horse is claiming they don't see it that way.

They'll vote for Satan before they vote Trump. That is why his (Satan's) Downs syndrome child is at the top of the Democratic ticket.
It’s basically the media’s fault for the non-stop anti-Trump shows for the past decade. They are totally brainwashed.
 
It’s basically the media’s fault for the non-stop anti-Trump shows for the past decade. They are totally brainwashed.
They are like Eloi in the time machine. Bred for sacrifice when needed.
 
So the choice is between Trump, who is putting forth good policies with the hope he will be able to push through at least some of them….

…or Harris, who is putting forth ridiculous, harmful policies with the hope that she fails on all of them?
Haha, no. Do you really think repealing Obamacare with no back up plan a good policy? Ripping up the Iran deal with no collaboration with our allies and no form of accountability to take its place, a good policy? Gutting our embassies a good policy? No, those where Trump acting on populist hot air in a very careless and reckless way
 
If that’s how you define socialism then our country and every single politician in it is socialist as we have always had those kind of tax and spend programs in our government. That’s not an intellectually honest argument though
That’s because we are primarily capitalist but with some basic socialist-type policies like welfare. Kamala wants to make us primarily socialist by introducing new policies like free house down payments. She also wants to tax businesses more.

Basically, she wants to give money to lower-income or undisciplined people for unnecessary things (like owning a home) by taking money from higher-income or disciplined people.

It took me until age 40 to buy my townhouse, after 15 years of saving and earning enough money to afford everything that entails. Why should I have to pay for a 25-year-old to get one, ESPECIALLY since they will have no skin in the game and more likely to default?

We need to get away from the leftist idea that all people are equal. Some are capable of home ownership, and others are not.
 
Haha, no. Do you really think repealing Obamacare with no back up plan a good policy? Ripping up the Iran deal with no collaboration with our allies and no form of accountability to take its place, a good policy? Gutting our embassies a good policy? No, those where Trump acting on populist hot air in a very careless and reckless way
But he put forth some very good policies that he DID do. He said he would make the border more secure, and he did. He said he would lower taxes, and he did. He said he would create a more business-friendly environment, and he did - thereby seeing real wage growth. He said he would keep the world more peaceful, and advanced Middle East progress toward peace with the Abraham Accords.

Under the Democrats, we have a massive invasion of low-level foreigners competing with our lower-income citizens for housing and food….skyhigh food and housing inflation…two major wars….horrible antisemitic actions on liberal campuses.

So it still comes down to: do you vote for the person advancing good policies, hoping that at least some of them get through…..or do you vote for the person advancing bad policy, and hope that Congress will block them all?

You people know how awful and stupid Kamala is, but you are so enamored by her being a) a Female Black, and/or b) not Trump, whom the media has brainwashed you is a ā€œthreat to democracyā€ that you are voting for someone who proposes to destroy this country - and just hope she doesn’t it.
 
A vote for Kamala is a vote for:
  • Open borders
  • Inflation
  • Forever wars
  • Harsh punishment only for enemies of the regime
  • Transitioning children without parental consent
Who supports these policies?
 

Kamala Harris Endorses Nixonomics​

We wrote Friday that Kamala Harris was likely to continue President Biden’s unfinished Build Back Better agenda, but it turns out we were far too optimistic. The policy priorities the Vice President laid out Friday are much worse, including a plan to impose national price controls on food and groceries.

Ms. Harris’s political problem is that the Biden-Harris economic policies have delivered inflation and declining real incomes. The high price of food is a particular sore point, and the Vice President’s response is to make it worse by resorting to Venezuelan-style left-wing populism. That’s no exaggeration.

On Friday she floated a ā€œfirst-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries,ā€ including ā€œnew authorityā€ for the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general to punish companies for charging too much.
This sounds like legislation introduced by Sen. Elizabeth Warren that would ban ā€œgrossly excessive pricesā€ as determined by the Federal Trade Commission. Business violations would carry a penalty of up to 5% of annual revenue. This would effectively let the FTC set prices. But what is an excessive price? Is $4 too much for a gallon of milk in Omaha? Is it a different price in Miami? FTC Chair Lina Khan and her army of bureaucrats would presumably decide.

This is perfect.

She's a moron. She knows nothing. And she picked a VP that is stupid as she is.

You ever hear about what happened with Rent Control (no supply) or Gas Price Freezes (long lines).

Price is what clears the market. Harris does not understand that increasing the money supply pushes up prices. She's done it already. If she trys this, then she's going to likely see prices go up. That or the products wont be available. Like waiting in line for bread like they do in Russia ?

I never thought the day would come where we'd put a full-on retard in the W.H. With Bush we got close.

Kamala Wants Price Controls on Groceries, Venezuelan-Style​


More like Nixon style GOP communism.
 
A vote for Kamala is a vote for:
  • Open borders
  • Inflation
  • Forever wars
  • Harsh punishment only for enemies of the regime
  • Transitioning children without parental consent
Who supports these policies?
The feds do not control children and their sexual identity.
 
Weren't you just in another thread bitching about high grocery prices?

Do you want something done or not?

Make up your alleged mind.

Why can't we be more like North Korea or Cuba?
 

Kamala Harris Endorses Nixonomics​

We wrote Friday that Kamala Harris was likely to continue President Biden’s unfinished Build Back Better agenda, but it turns out we were far too optimistic. The policy priorities the Vice President laid out Friday are much worse, including a plan to impose national price controls on food and groceries.

Ms. Harris’s political problem is that the Biden-Harris economic policies have delivered inflation and declining real incomes. The high price of food is a particular sore point, and the Vice President’s response is to make it worse by resorting to Venezuelan-style left-wing populism. That’s no exaggeration.

On Friday she floated a ā€œfirst-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries,ā€ including ā€œnew authorityā€ for the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general to punish companies for charging too much.
This sounds like legislation introduced by Sen. Elizabeth Warren that would ban ā€œgrossly excessive pricesā€ as determined by the Federal Trade Commission. Business violations would carry a penalty of up to 5% of annual revenue. This would effectively let the FTC set prices. But what is an excessive price? Is $4 too much for a gallon of milk in Omaha? Is it a different price in Miami? FTC Chair Lina Khan and her army of bureaucrats would presumably decide.

This is perfect.

She's a moron. She knows nothing. And she picked a VP that is stupid as she is.

You ever hear about what happened with Rent Control (no supply) or Gas Price Freezes (long lines).

Price is what clears the market. Harris does not understand that increasing the money supply pushes up prices. She's done it already. If she trys this, then she's going to likely see prices go up. That or the products wont be available. Like waiting in line for bread like they do in Russia ?

I never thought the day would come where we'd put a full-on retard in the W.H. With Bush we got close.

Aren't you calling for "mass deportations now". Trump closed the border and didn't let mirgrant farm workers in to work in the fields, planting and harvesting. Food prices went up.

What do you think will happen to your economy when you deport 11 million people??? Who's going to plant your crops, harvest and process the food, and work in the restaurant business for $2.50 an hour plus tips?????

You people don't have the common sense God gave a goose.
 
A vote for Kamala is a vote for:
  • Open borders
  • Inflation
  • Forever wars
  • Harsh punishment only for enemies of the regime
  • Transitioning children without parental consent
Who supports these policies?

Since none of these things are "Harris policies". You're flat out lying. Not a word of your post is true.

Please stop parroting Trump's lies, and get back to us when you know what's going on.
 
That’s because we are primarily capitalist but with some basic socialist-type policies like welfare. Kamala wants to make us primarily socialist by introducing new policies like free house down payments. She also wants to tax businesses more.

Basically, she wants to give money to lower-income or undisciplined people for unnecessary things (like owning a home) by taking money from higher-income or disciplined people.

It took me until age 40 to buy my townhouse, after 15 years of saving and earning enough money to afford everything that entails. Why should I have to pay for a 25-year-old to get one, ESPECIALLY since they will have no skin in the game and more likely to default?

We need to get away from the leftist idea that all people are equal. Some are capable of home ownership, and others are not.
What you’re describing is not socialism. It’s not government control of the means and distribution of industry. You need to better learn definitions of words
 
But he put forth some very good policies that he DID do. He said he would make the border more secure, and he did. He said he would lower taxes, and he did. He said he would create a more business-friendly environment, and he did - thereby seeing real wage growth. He said he would keep the world more peaceful, and advanced Middle East progress toward peace with the Abraham Accords.

Under the Democrats, we have a massive invasion of low-level foreigners competing with our lower-income citizens for housing and food….skyhigh food and housing inflation…two major wars….horrible antisemitic actions on liberal campuses.

So it still comes down to: do you vote for the person advancing good policies, hoping that at least some of them get through…..or do you vote for the person advancing bad policy, and hope that Congress will block them all?

You people know how awful and stupid Kamala is, but you are so enamored by her being a) a Female Black, and/or b) not Trump, whom the media has brainwashed you is a ā€œthreat to democracyā€ that you are voting for someone who proposes to destroy this country - and just hope she doesn’t it.
See how you ignore the bad examples I pointed to with Trump while cherry picking a few from Kamala? That’s not a very honest way to debate.

You obviously agree with Trumps policies more than Kamala. Policy wise I don’t agree very much with Kamala either. But that’s a whole different topic of conversation.

This topic is about price gouging
 
What you’re describing is not socialism. It’s not government control of the means and distribution of industry. You need to better learn definitions of words
Except Kamala HAS suggested taking over the means of production on a specific industry if the business owners don’t do what the government says. She’s on tape, saying ā€œyes, we can do it.ā€

She’s leading us toward socialism. So what we have is an idiot picked for her female blackness whose proposals will destroy the country IF she’s elected and IF we don’t have enough Republicans to stop her.
 
See how you ignore the bad examples I pointed to with Trump while cherry picking a few from Kamala? That’s not a very honest way to debate.

You obviously agree with Trumps policies more than Kamala. Policy wise I don’t agree very much with Kamala either. But that’s a whole different topic of conversation.

This topic is about price gouging
I didn’t know enough about the bad examples you gave to comment, so I chose to focus on the GOOD things Trump proposed and accomplished. Kamala, otoh, doesn’t have one single good proposal.

As far as gouging, the point you have made is that she’s just making an empty ā€œpromiseā€ she’s knows she can’t fulfill in order to fool the useful idiots. But my point is she’s making a BAD proposal that, if it did go through, would destroy the economy.

So we are back to the choice between:

  • a radical leftist who is proposing bad policies, but they won’t go through, or…
  • a moderate who is proposing good policies, and some will go through

It comes down to your saying you are going to vote for the candidate with the bad policies, with the hope she’s stopped. No offrnse, but that sounds dumb to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom