Kamala Harris- foretold in the Holy Bible?

View attachment 448445




"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4





I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.



Yeah well. Didn’t Revelation also say that you would not be able to buy or sell without wearing the mark? That was likely a misspelling and should have said mask instead of mark.

It is the same thing with the verse you referenced. It was supposed to say jurple not purple. So nah. That’s not Kamala Harris.

The Mark of the Beast was Roman coin that had the image of the Emperor engraved on it. You couldn't buy or sell in Israel without using it and it was very offensive to the Jewish people.

The whore of Babylon is Israel. Many times in the OT she was accused of whoring after false gods.. (Babylon)

Just like Kammie does.
 
View attachment 448445


"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4





I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.


Yeah well. Didn’t Revelation also say that you would not be able to buy or sell without wearing the mark? That was likely a misspelling and should have said mask instead of mark.

It is the same thing with the verse you referenced. It was supposed to say jurple not purple. So nah. That’s not Kamala Harris.

The Mark of the Beast was Roman coin that had the image of the Emperor engraved on it. You couldn't buy or sell in Israel without using it and it was very offensive to the Jewish people.

The whore of Babylon is Israel. Many times in the OT she was accused of whoring after false gods.. (Babylon)

Just like Kammie does.


Does what?
 
View attachment 448445




"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4








I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.
The color purple has always been the color of royalty and pearls and gold, the jewelry of the wealthy. As to the "fornication," well, she's no beauty and there's not much going on intellectually.
She's a pretty typical Commie.
 
View attachment 448445




"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4








I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.
The color purple has always been the color of royalty and pearls and gold, the jewelry of the wealthy. As to the "fornication," well, she's no beauty and there's not much going on intellectually.
She's a pretty typical Commie.

Only Commies have affairs before marriage??? What about Trump's affairs while he was married? Is he also a Commie?
 
View attachment 448445


"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4





I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.


Yeah well. Didn’t Revelation also say that you would not be able to buy or sell without wearing the mark? That was likely a misspelling and should have said mask instead of mark.

It is the same thing with the verse you referenced. It was supposed to say jurple not purple. So nah. That’s not Kamala Harris.

The Mark of the Beast was Roman coin that had the image of the Emperor engraved on it. You couldn't buy or sell in Israel without using it and it was very offensive to the Jewish people.

The whore of Babylon is Israel. Many times in the OT she was accused of whoring after false gods.. (Babylon)

Just like Kammie does.


Does what?
1800
 
View attachment 448445


"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4





I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.


Yeah well. Didn’t Revelation also say that you would not be able to buy or sell without wearing the mark? That was likely a misspelling and should have said mask instead of mark.

It is the same thing with the verse you referenced. It was supposed to say jurple not purple. So nah. That’s not Kamala Harris.

The Mark of the Beast was Roman coin that had the image of the Emperor engraved on it. You couldn't buy or sell in Israel without using it and it was very offensive to the Jewish people.

The whore of Babylon is Israel. Many times in the OT she was accused of whoring after false gods.. (Babylon)

Just like Kammie does.


Does what?

As little as possible that might put a tarnish on what she wants her reputation to be. Like admitting to all of her lies, not visiting the border after her alleged boss put her in charge of it, holding news conferences to answer ay real question that might be put to her, laughing about visiting the border.

She is about as phony as the description of the whore of Babylon except she is the real; thing.
 
View attachment 448445


"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4





I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.


Yeah well. Didn’t Revelation also say that you would not be able to buy or sell without wearing the mark? That was likely a misspelling and should have said mask instead of mark.

It is the same thing with the verse you referenced. It was supposed to say jurple not purple. So nah. That’s not Kamala Harris.

The Mark of the Beast was Roman coin that had the image of the Emperor engraved on it. You couldn't buy or sell in Israel without using it and it was very offensive to the Jewish people.

The whore of Babylon is Israel. Many times in the OT she was accused of whoring after false gods.. (Babylon)

Just like Kammie does.


Does what?
1800

She sits above the common people and craps on their heads? Seems about right.
 
View attachment 448445


"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4





I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.


Yeah well. Didn’t Revelation also say that you would not be able to buy or sell without wearing the mark? That was likely a misspelling and should have said mask instead of mark.

It is the same thing with the verse you referenced. It was supposed to say jurple not purple. So nah. That’s not Kamala Harris.

The Mark of the Beast was Roman coin that had the image of the Emperor engraved on it. You couldn't buy or sell in Israel without using it and it was very offensive to the Jewish people.

The whore of Babylon is Israel. Many times in the OT she was accused of whoring after false gods.. (Babylon)

Just like Kammie does.


Does what?
1800

She sits above the common people and craps on their heads? Seems about right.

The accusations of Whore of Babylon was about chastising Israel.

You might want to read the whole Bible.
 
View attachment 448445


"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"- Revelation 17:4





I'm not a Trained Theologian, and I've never been to seminary.


However, this is something that the Religious Left needs to respond to.


Yeah well. Didn’t Revelation also say that you would not be able to buy or sell without wearing the mark? That was likely a misspelling and should have said mask instead of mark.

It is the same thing with the verse you referenced. It was supposed to say jurple not purple. So nah. That’s not Kamala Harris.

The Mark of the Beast was Roman coin that had the image of the Emperor engraved on it. You couldn't buy or sell in Israel without using it and it was very offensive to the Jewish people.

The whore of Babylon is Israel. Many times in the OT she was accused of whoring after false gods.. (Babylon)

Just like Kammie does.


Does what?
1800

She sits above the common people and craps on their heads? Seems about right.

The accusations of Whore of Babylon was about chastising Israel.

You might want to read the whole Bible.

I read fiction when I can and have read the bible. Extreme fiction and this entire thread is about a false premise.
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
Then why didn't he pay off any of the other 2 dozen or so women who claimed of sexual improprieties? Your baseless defense makes no sense?
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
Then why didn't he pay off any of the other 2 dozen or so women who claimed of sexual improprieties? Your baseless defense makes no sense?

Or, your baseless accusations make no sense. If it had really happened they would have continued with their claims in a further effort to gain notoriety and money. When they dropped it, all that came to an end except for people like you.
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
Then why didn't he pay off any of the other 2 dozen or so women who claimed of sexual improprieties? Your baseless defense makes no sense?

Or, your baseless accusations make no sense. If it had really happened they would have continued with their claims in a further effort to gain notoriety and money. When they dropped it, all that came to an end except for people like you.
LOLOL

Your brain is baseless. My claims? Not so much.
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
Then why didn't he pay off any of the other 2 dozen or so women who claimed of sexual improprieties? Your baseless defense makes no sense?

Or, your baseless accusations make no sense. If it had really happened they would have continued with their claims in a further effort to gain notoriety and money. When they dropped it, all that came to an end except for people like you.
LOLOL

Your brain is baseless. My claims? Not so much.

So your proof is that you are to stupid to think for yourself. Sounds about right.
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
Then why didn't he pay off any of the other 2 dozen or so women who claimed of sexual improprieties? Your baseless defense makes no sense?

Or, your baseless accusations make no sense. If it had really happened they would have continued with their claims in a further effort to gain notoriety and money. When they dropped it, all that came to an end except for people like you.
LOLOL

Your brain is baseless. My claims? Not so much.

So your proof is that you are to stupid to think for yourself. Sounds about right.
No, Spunky, my claim is not baseless. It's based on Trump paying her to be silent. And then lying that he paid her to be silent. Along with the reality that he didn't payoff the other 2 dozen women making various claims.
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
Then why didn't he pay off any of the other 2 dozen or so women who claimed of sexual improprieties? Your baseless defense makes no sense?

Or, your baseless accusations make no sense. If it had really happened they would have continued with their claims in a further effort to gain notoriety and money. When they dropped it, all that came to an end except for people like you.
LOLOL

Your brain is baseless. My claims? Not so much.

So your proof is that you are to stupid to think for yourself. Sounds about right.
No, Spunky, my claim is not baseless. It's based on Trump paying her to be silent. And then lying that he paid her to be silent. Along with the reality that he didn't payoff the other 2 dozen women making various claims.

And of course you have PROOF of your false claims, right?

Proof that you can present here, other than your doubtful claims?

I will wait and then disprove whatever you claim, as it is all made up. Remember, if there was proof all of Trumps enemies would never have let it go. Kind of like you and your idiotic claims.
 
Try the history of John's time. May want to look up the antics of the Roman Empresses, Messalina. Most will probably say, We're better with Vice-President Harris.

Actually, um, no. Her husband, Emperor Claudius, had mistresses. (In fact, they used one of his mistresses to tell him that his wife and her lover were attempting a coup). Kind of hard to say it's okay for a guy to screw around and not a woman. Claudius actually kind of looks good because compare to Caligula and Nero, he was relatively benign. He only had people killed who had it coming.

But the right wing, Trump can have sex with porn stars, but Harris gets condemned for having a relationship 30 years ago with Willie Brown.


President Trump answered the queries on this, and denied having relations with the alleged "porn star" "Stormy".

Until libs can produce the President's DNA, it is a Lie, one of the many thousands told by Sleepy Joe.

BTW, this lie doesn't even make sense. Mr. Trump is a devout germophobe, and Daniels isn't even his type. The Donald goes for the "Supermodel" type, and whether you think she's attractive or not, Daniels ain't that type
If it was a lie, why did Trump pay her to not talk about publicly?


To prevent distractions during the middle of the campaign.
Then why didn't he pay off any of the other 2 dozen or so women who claimed of sexual improprieties? Your baseless defense makes no sense?

Or, your baseless accusations make no sense. If it had really happened they would have continued with their claims in a further effort to gain notoriety and money. When they dropped it, all that came to an end except for people like you.
LOLOL

Your brain is baseless. My claims? Not so much.

So your proof is that you are to stupid to think for yourself. Sounds about right.
No, Spunky, my claim is not baseless. It's based on Trump paying her to be silent. And then lying that he paid her to be silent. Along with the reality that he didn't payoff the other 2 dozen women making various claims.

And of course you have PROOF of your false claims, right?

Proof that you can present here, other than your doubtful claims?

I will wait and then disprove whatever you claim, as it is all made up. Remember, if there was proof all of Trumps enemies would never have let it go. Kind of like you and your idiotic claims.
I presented my proof and yet you actually didn't disprove any of it.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top