Dr Grump
Platinum Member
I know. And the US is a lot poorer for it.Just so that you know, that’s not gonna happen here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know. And the US is a lot poorer for it.Just so that you know, that’s not gonna happen here.
Sad state of affaris.Australia outlawed semi auto almost overnight, guns like the Mini 14 and AR 15 we’re confiscated by the govt. They can’t even have a 1911 .45 now.
And yet, you agree: the TX abortion is constitutional.Correct.
Indeed, conservatives have nothing but contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.
And yet, you agree: the TX abortion law is constitutional.Even if the bible does ‘ban’ abortion, it’s legally and Constitutionally irrelevant; subjective religious dogma in no manner ‘justifies’ the state violating a woman’s right to privacy.
God made it that way.Why are they tramps and men are studs?
Which one?God made it that way.
There is only One GOD.Which one?
"He who HAS no Name".Which one?
I don't sound like a sociopath but you sure do. The process of debate can only occur with civilized people you are definitely not civilized.
Total BS. He is the only bringing science to the table. You're just flaming.You actually do sound like a sociopath. You sound positively off your rocker in this thread. Sorry to break it to you
Your problem is that Constitutional protection for killing the unborn is an interpreted 'right'. Meaning it is subject to a new interpretation at any time. The protection you want requires an amendment. Since Roe, an entire body of law has arisen to protect the unborn, you folks are in a losing battle and just don't see it yet.Even if the bible does ‘ban’ abortion, it’s legally and Constitutionally irrelevant; subjective religious dogma in no manner ‘justifies’ the state violating a woman’s right to privacy.
Clayton believes the TX abortion law is constitutional.Your problem is that Constitutional protection for killing the unborn is an interpreted 'right'
Let's hope so.Your problem is that Constitutional protection for killing the unborn is an interpreted 'right'. Meaning it is subject to a new interpretation at any time. The protection you want requires an amendment. Since Roe, an entire body of law has arisen to protect the unborn, you folks are in a losing battle and just don't see it yet.
It isn't a child till it's born, at 20 weeks it's a fetus. With the potential to become a child, only the potential.so at 20 weeks when the child can survive outside the womb is it a child then?
The people you are arguing with are most likely also the ones who fear more immigrants. They don't want actual people to live here, but they're trying to defend potential people. There's a big disconnect here. The reason isn't based on reality, it's based on emotions.No babies have been murdered.
A lot of problems.what does human pregnancy make?
The " tramp " ? Just a little prejudiced and misogynist aren't you !Why doesn't the tramp use CONDOMS? Promiscuous sex causes conception. Also spreads VD and AIDS. Have you forgotten AIDS?
You nailed it, Mr Mike. The Clintons stacked the Justice deck with their own ilk. They got 70 million future Americans killed. Time to restack the deck in favor of the founder's erudite faith in their descendants. And we have 70 million reasons to do just that.Justice department? That's a joke.