Justice Department sues Texas over restrictive abortion law

[Dr Grump]

Just so that you know, that’s not gonna happen here.

I know. And the US is a lot poorer for it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Australia outlawed semi auto almost overnight, guns like the Mini 14 and AR 15 we’re confiscated by the govt. They can’t even have a 1911 .45 now.

Sad state of affaris.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Correct.
Indeed, conservatives have nothing but contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.

And yet, you agree: the TX abortion is constitutional.
Why won't you admit this?
Can't muster the intellectual honesty?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Even if the bible does ‘ban’ abortion, it’s legally and Constitutionally irrelevant; subjective religious dogma in no manner ‘justifies’ the state violating a woman’s right to privacy.

And yet, you agree: the TX abortion law is constitutional.

 

[Donald H]

It sounds like both sides here on this forum just want a fight and could care less about women and unborn babies.

 

[San Souci]

Why are they tramps and men are studs?

God made it that way.

 

[Dr Grump]

God made it that way.

Which one?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Which one?

There is only One GOD.

 

[San Souci]

Which one?

"He who HAS no Name".

 

[Osiris-ODS]

I don't sound like a sociopath but you sure do. The process of debate can only occur with civilized people you are definitely not civilized.

You actually do sound like a sociopath. You sound positively off your rocker in this thread. Sorry to break it to you.

 

[Dr Grump]

You actually do sound like a sociopath. You sound positively off your rocker in this thread. Sorry to break it to you

Total BS. He is the only bringing science to the table. You're just flaming.

 

[Rogue AI]

Even if the bible does ‘ban’ abortion, it’s legally and Constitutionally irrelevant; subjective religious dogma in no manner ‘justifies’ the state violating a woman’s right to privacy.

Your problem is that Constitutional protection for killing the unborn is an interpreted 'right'. Meaning it is subject to a new interpretation at any time. The protection you want requires an amendment. Since Roe, an entire body of law has arisen to protect the unborn, you folks are in a losing battle and just don't see it yet.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Your problem is that Constitutional protection for killing the unborn is an interpreted 'right'

Clayton believes the TX abortion law is constitutional.
Ask him.
He'll tell you.

 

[beagle9]

Your problem is that Constitutional protection for killing the unborn is an interpreted 'right'. Meaning it is subject to a new interpretation at any time. The protection you want requires an amendment. Since Roe, an entire body of law has arisen to protect the unborn, you folks are in a losing battle and just don't see it yet.

Let's hope so.

 

[Bezukhov]

Maybe the people will finally learn the beauty of jury nullification. Imagine if no one is ever successfully sued under this.

 

[Stann]

so at 20 weeks when the child can survive outside the womb is it a child then?

It isn't a child till it's born, at 20 weeks it's a fetus. With the potential to become a child, only the potential.

 

[Stann]

No babies have been murdered.

The people you are arguing with are most likely also the ones who fear more immigrants. They don't want actual people to live here, but they're trying to defend potential people. There's a big disconnect here. The reason isn't based on reality, it's based on emotions.

 

[Stann]

what does human pregnancy make?

A lot of problems.

 

[Stann]

Why doesn't the tramp use CONDOMS? Promiscuous sex causes conception. Also spreads VD and AIDS. Have you forgotten AIDS?

The " tramp " ? Just a little prejudiced and misogynist aren't you !

 

[beautress]

Justice department? That's a joke.

You nailed it, Mr Mike. The Clintons stacked the Justice deck with their own ilk. They got 70 million future Americans killed. Time to restack the deck in favor of the founder's erudite faith in their descendants. And we have 70 million reasons to do just that.