Justice Department indicts former FBI Director James Comey for a second time

[Alweysrite!]

And a juvenile and reckless President shouild be 86'd using one of the Constitutionally prescribed methods.

WW

Yes, not with violent threats on social media by an X FBI director

 

[Political-Junkie]

You'll find out, hopefully.

How can I find out if you can't even say?

 

[Political-Junkie]

You do?

I do. So how did that turn out?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Yes, not with violent threats on social media by an X FBI director

There was no violent thread on social media by an Ex-FBI Director.

There was a political comment to remove the current President, but that is not a threat of violence.

WW

What does 'eighty-six' mean?

It comes from 1930s soda-counter slang meaning that an item was sold out.

www.merriam-webster.com

 

[Alweysrite!]

There was no violent thread on social media by an Ex-FBI Director.

There was a political comment to remove the current President, but that is not a threat of violence.

WW

What does 'eighty-six' mean?

It comes from 1930s soda-counter slang meaning that an item was sold out.

www.merriam-webster.com

It seemed violent to me

 

[Political-Junkie]

Not very often that a former head of the FBI threatens the life of a sitting President.

How did he do that?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Oh, so exactly like Letitia James did to Trump?

And how did that work out for her?

 

[DonGlock26]

So you dont care if he did anything wrong, only that it costs him money, because your Rape God no like him.

Yeah, that tracks, for a cultist with no ethics or morals.

The grand jury indicted him, right? Respect the process.

 

[DonGlock26]

And how did that work out for her?

You tell us.

"New York State Attorney General Indicted​

Thursday, October 9, 2025
Share

For Immediate Release
U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Virginia

ALEXANDRIA, Va. – Lindsey Halligan, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, announced today that a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging New York State Attorney General Letitia James with Bank Fraud under 18 U.S.C. Section 1344 and False Statements to a Financial Institution under 18 U.S.C. Section 1014.

“No one is above the law. The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust,” said U.S. Attorney Halligan. “The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.”

If convicted, Letitia James faces penalties including up to 30 years in prison per count, up to a $1 million fine on each count, and forfeiture. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

An indictment is merely an accusation. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Contact
Contact: Press Officer
USAVAE.Press@usdoj.gov
Updated October 9, 2025"

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/new-york-state-attorney-general-indicted

 

[DonGlock26]

I do.

Based on what?

 

[Rawley]

How did he do that?

There's a whole thread on it. Oh, that's right, it's this thread.

 

[Political-Junkie]

You tell us.

"New York State Attorney General Indicted​

Thursday, October 9, 2025
Share

For Immediate Release
U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Virginia

ALEXANDRIA, Va. – Lindsey Halligan, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, announced today that a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging New York State Attorney General Letitia James with Bank Fraud under 18 U.S.C. Section 1344 and False Statements to a Financial Institution under 18 U.S.C. Section 1014.

“No one is above the law. The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust,” said U.S. Attorney Halligan. “The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.”

If convicted, Letitia James faces penalties including up to 30 years in prison per count, up to a $1 million fine on each count, and forfeiture. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

An indictment is merely an accusation. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Contact
Contact: Press Officer
USAVAE.Press@usdoj.gov
Updated October 9, 2025"

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/new-york-state-attorney-general-indicted

Was she convicted?

 

[DonGlock26]

Was she convicted?

She hasn't had a trial yet. The case is being appealed.

 

[Political-Junkie]

There's a whole thread on it. Oh, that's right, it's this thread.

There's nothing in this thread that's threatening the life of a president. "86" doesn't mean assassinate. From AI:

 

[Rawley]

There's nothing in this thread that's threatening the life of a president. "86" doesn't mean assassinate. From AI:

View attachment 1250500

Well, you should send this to the defendant. Though doubtful he will pin his defense on an AI definition.

 

[Political-Junkie]

She hasn't had a trial yet. The case is being appealed.

Because her indictment was thrown out and subsequent attempts to indict her failed to convince a grand jury.

Their appeal is most likely going to fail since Halligan was not lawfully appointed.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Well, you should send this to the defendant. Though doubtful he will pin his defense on an AI definition.

No need to. Judges know that too.

 

[DonGlock26]

Because her indictment was thrown out and subsequent attempts to indict her failed to convince a grand jury.

Their appeal is most likely going to fail since Halligan was not lawfully appointed.

We'll see. They can always try again.

 

[Political-Junkie]

We'll see. They can always try again.

Try what again? Appeal to a higher court? I don't see how any appellate court could find her appointment lawful. Not if they're following the law.

 

[Rawley]

No need to. Judges know that too.

Perhaps you should look at what the law requires.