Justice Barrett’s take down of Jackson as an idiot today is made all the more remarkable by the fact that she did it in the Opinion of the Court ...

[HikerGuy83]

Who?? WTF are you jabbering about now?

You are so clueless....did you escape the Alzheimer's ward again.

 

[HikerGuy83]

So where does it say that they can not issure nation wide injuctions?

The same place it says you can have medicare.

It doesn't.

That's what so-called constitutional law is about.

But let me read to you from the guy who wrote most of the Constitution.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.

****************************

Sooooo ProgressivePervert....

If it's not defined it's not.

And since such rulings are not defined....they don't exist.

And the SCOTUS (especially the smart (right leaning) ones) know the Constitution better than you know the blow up doll you whine and dine every night.

 

[struth]

Jackson’s opinion is shocking, she is outright admitting she’s in over her head

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Who?? WTF are you jabbering about now?

What is this topic about?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Justice Barrett isn't the only one taking aim at the incompetent Jackson. The black woman infuriated Gorsuch too.

Jackson's dissent isn't heroic. It exposes big problem with Supreme Court. | Opinion

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Neil Gorsuch took fierce swings at each other in Stanley v. City of Sanford. And revealed a deep divide.

www.usatoday.com

Chief Justice Robert's has only given her six cases. Next session she likely will get none.

 

[Lisa558]

Maybe it’s wishful thinking on my part, but is it possible that the DEI justice knows she got in because she is a female black, that she is in over her head, knows that the other justices know it, knows that the entire SCOTUS is angry that someone with so little substance (she didn’t even apply case law!) sits with them, and that doesn’t want 30 years of this, and will resign to teach a course at Harvard or Columbia for $1 million a year?

Or will she just smirk knowing that she got the post due to her being a female black, and continue crying about racism and “No More Walanda”?

P.S. Asking for a friend.

 

[HikerGuy83]

What is this topic about?

Oh, why would he care. He just needs to jizz on the board because his token SCOTUS judge is a complete moron and he's got to deflect.

Calling her a "strong person" can only mean he's met her and smelled her breath after she ate garlic toast.

 

[BackAgain]

BS. The majority opinion was activist.

Another term which libtards bandy about but which they don’t understand.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Another term which libtards bandy about but which they don’t understand.

IM2 stupid to know better is another moron on my ignore list.

Activism happens when jerk-offs like William O Douglas stick their hand up their ass and pull out an opinion.

 

[BackAgain]

IM2 stupid to know better is another moron on my ignore list.

Activism happens when jerk-offs like William O Douglas stick their hand up their ass and pull out an opinion.

My favorite? it was William O who was in favor of giving “standing to sue” to … <<wait for it>> … to a tree.

 

[HikerGuy83]

My favorite? it was William O who was in favor of giving “standing to sue” to … <<wait for it>> … to a tree.

To many drugs and Robert Stephenson novels.

 

[scruffy]

The problem with you good 'ol boys is that you are freaked out by a strong, accomplished , and intelligent woman of color with a quick wit and a sharp tongue

lol

That ain't Jackson. She's a brain dead DEI nominee who doesn't even know what a woman is

 

[scruffy]

Bullshit . You're frightened of her . You INCELS are frightened of all strong women. You do the same shit to all of them . You did it to Harris, you do it to Crockett,. You do it to AOC , You are weak and pathetic . I'm surprised that you haven't yet insinuated that Jackson is a drunk. Hurry up,. One of you jadrools might beat you to it

You're not very bright are you.

 

[HikerGuy83]

lol

That ain't Jackson. She's a brain dead DEI nominee who doesn't even know what a woman is

That's pretty much TheProgressivePatriot - pervert.

 

[scruffy]

Jackson’s opinion is shocking, she is outright admitting she’s in over her head

She's in over her... wait for it... head.

 

[Lisa558]

BS. The majority opinion was activist.

IM2 is such a racist that he figures that if an entire group of people think one way, and the sole female black is the outlier thinking another way, that the female black is the correct one.

 

[Care4all]

It just destroys you folks when the Constitution and Common Sense prevails. smh

What common sense is there, when a clearly unconstitutional act takes place by a president, and it can't be stopped from harming all citizens, until years of working its way through the courts?

 

[Lisa558]

What common sense is there, when a clearly unconstitutional act takes place by a president, and it can't be stopped from harming all citizens, until years of working its way through the courts?

No, in that case, if the president is doing something unconstitutional, it can be fast-tracked to the SCOTUS.

Take when Biden wanted to ignore that law about the illegals remaining in Mexico (Title 42 or something) in order to bring in as many lowlife illegals as possible - and to the detriment of American citizens. The SCOTUS stopped him.

(In fact, Biden said he KNEW it was unconstitutional but went ahead anyway.)

 

[Care4all]

No, in that case, if the president is doing something unconstitutional, it can be fast-tracked to the SCOTUS.

Take when Biden wanted to ignore that law about the illegals remaining in Mexico (Title 42 or something) in order to bring in as many lowlife illegals as possible - and to the detriment of American citizens. The SCOTUS stopped him.

(In fact, Biden said he KNEW it was unconstitutional but went ahead anyway.)

Huh? SCOTUS stopped Biden from continuing to use Title 42 to stop illegals from entry, once COVID pandemic ended....?

 

[Lisa558]

Huh? SCOTUS stopped Biden from continuing to use Title 42 to stop illegals from entry, once COVID pandemic ended....?

Yes, Biden tried to jump ahead before the emergency was declared over. The SCOTUS stopped him.

Of course, eventually Biden was able to open the floodgates, but thankfully Trump has stopped that. Now we have a lot of work to undo all of Biden’s damage.