Justice Alito just telegraphed that red states could go after Biden for releasing money to Iran

So what? We released their money to be used for humanitarian purposes, which of course freed up resources for them to further fund Hamas and other terrorist organizations. Under Biden's watch, the entire Middle East has become even less stable and Iran will become a nuclear power. Biden is a first class traitor and/or a complete idiot.
Something any third grader could figure out, but not the idiot democrats.
 
Well there you have it.
Iran is our enemy.
Hostility between the two countries doesn't make them AT WAR.

Both America and USSR were at one point or another arming people who they were at war with, but there was never an outright war between the two.

to be convicted of treason by aiding an enemy, a person must give aid or comfort to a subject of a foreign power openly at war with the U.S. and the person must do so with an intent to betray the U.S.

 
Last edited:
Hostility between the two countries doesn't make them AT WAR.

Both America and USSR were at one point or another arming people who they were at war with, but there was never an outright war between the two.

to be convicted of treason by aiding an enemy, a person must give aid or comfort to a subject of a foreign power openly at war with the U.S. and the person must do so with an intent to betray the U.S.


LOL...you're an idiot!!
They're supplying the weapons to be used against our military,thats reason enough to fuck em up!!
 
LOL...you're an idiot!!
They're supplying the weapons to be used against our military,thats reason enough to fuck em up!!

It's not about having reasons, it's about being at war with a country or not.

We supply weapons to Ukraine who is at war with Russia, however that doesn't mean that US is at war with Russia.

You calling someone an idiot while not understanding something so simple is hilarious.
 
It's not about having reasons, it's about being at war with a country or not.

You calling someone an idiot while not understanding something so simple is hilarious.
it doesnt say anything about war,, it specificly says ENEMY"

You calling someone an idiot while not understanding something so simple is hilarious.
 
it doesnt say anything about war,, it specificly says ENEMY
to be convicted of treason by aiding an enemy, a person must give aid or comfort to a subject of a foreign power openly at war with the U.S. and the person must do so with an intent to betray the U.S.

Treason: What Is It?

Collin Hart, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review “[N]o crime is greater than treason.”[1] While accusations should not be thrown around lightly, in the age of Trump, accusations o…
uclawreview.org
uclawreview.org
 
to be convicted of treason by aiding an enemy, a person must give aid or comfort to a subject of a foreign power openly at war with the U.S. and the person must do so with an intent to betray the U.S.

Treason: What Is It?

Collin Hart, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review “[N]o crime is greater than treason.”[1] While accusations should not be thrown around lightly, in the age of Trump, accusations o…
uclawreview.org
uclawreview.org
do you have anything of substance??

cause the 14th doesnt mention war,, its says aid and comfort to an enemy,,,
 
It's not about having reasons, it's about being at war with a country or not.

We supply weapons to Ukraine who is at war with Russia, however that doesn't mean that US is at war with Russia.

You calling someone an idiot while not understanding something so simple is hilarious.

Well then...if the russians dont want to get us to stop thats their problem.
 
to be convicted of treason by aiding an enemy, a person must give aid or comfort to a subject of a foreign power openly at war with the U.S. and the person must do so with an intent to betray the U.S.

Treason: What Is It?

Collin Hart, Associate Member, University of Cincinnati Law Review “[N]o crime is greater than treason.”[1] While accusations should not be thrown around lightly, in the age of Trump, accusations o…
uclawreview.org
uclawreview.org
just not seeing the word WAR in here,,

please advise??

 
Article cites specific cases that established the standards.
which is irrelevant,,

my link which is the text of the constitution is specific and even seperates war from giving aid and confort to the enemy,,

you should read it,, very informative,,,
 
which is irrelevant,,

my link which is the text of the constitution is specific and even seperates war from giving aid and confort to the enemy,,

you should read it,, very informative,,,

No dummy, it separates WAGING WAR, from giving aid to enemy.

“Enemy” has been established by case law to mean a country we are openly at war with.
 
No dummy, it separates WAGING WAR, from giving aid to enemy.

“Enemy” has been established by case law to mean a country we are openly at war with.
case law established that can ALSO be considered,,

it doesnt limit it to just countries we are at war with,,
 
We don't have to be! They've been labeled part of the Axis of Evil

Wrong.
Labels mean nothing.
The reality is that between Iran and the US, the US is by far the most evil.
We deliberately destroyed their democratic republic in 1953 by bribing the Shah in a coup that murdered tens of thousands. Worse even than Pinochet in Chile.
 

Forum List

Back
Top