Just One More Juxtaposition

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,283
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Every day, in so very many ways, the objective observer realized what a spectacular mistake it was to elect a President based on skin color.

Here's one dispositive comparison:


"Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal
...Obama infamously drew a "red line" with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria only to back away from it, and we now know why.

Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon, who recently wrote a book called "The Iran Wars," told MSNBC on Monday that the Obama administration's determination to close the Iran nuclear deal is to blame for the failure to act on its own red line in Syria."

Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal




"US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
(CNSNews.com) – U.S. forces carried out retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias overnight Thursday following a rocket attack on an Iraqi base that killed two U.S. troops...

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

‘That gave them something to think about’
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
 
Every day, in so very many ways, the objective observer realized what a spectacular mistake it was to elect a President based on skin color.

Here's one dispositive comparison:


"Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal
...Obama infamously drew a "red line" with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria only to back away from it, and we now know why.

Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon, who recently wrote a book called "The Iran Wars," told MSNBC on Monday that the Obama administration's determination to close the Iran nuclear deal is to blame for the failure to act on its own red line in Syria."

Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal




"US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
(CNSNews.com) – U.S. forces carried out retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias overnight Thursday following a rocket attack on an Iraqi base that killed two U.S. troops...

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

‘That gave them something to think about’
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?
 
Every day, in so very many ways, the objective observer realized what a spectacular mistake it was to elect a President based on skin color.

Here's one dispositive comparison:


"Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal
...Obama infamously drew a "red line" with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria only to back away from it, and we now know why.

Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon, who recently wrote a book called "The Iran Wars," told MSNBC on Monday that the Obama administration's determination to close the Iran nuclear deal is to blame for the failure to act on its own red line in Syria."

Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal




"US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
(CNSNews.com) – U.S. forces carried out retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias overnight Thursday following a rocket attack on an Iraqi base that killed two U.S. troops...

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

‘That gave them something to think about’
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?



Because the Muslim former-President, identified as a vassal of Iran, is no longer in charge.

Only a moron like you would be unable to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization.


BTW....Iran never stopped enriching uranium.....Obama saw to that by making certain that there were no inspections.
You didn't know that?

Add it to that vast list of other things you don't know.
 
Last edited:
Every day, in so very many ways, the objective observer realized what a spectacular mistake it was to elect a President based on skin color.

Here's one dispositive comparison:


"Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal
...Obama infamously drew a "red line" with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria only to back away from it, and we now know why.

Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon, who recently wrote a book called "The Iran Wars," told MSNBC on Monday that the Obama administration's determination to close the Iran nuclear deal is to blame for the failure to act on its own red line in Syria."

Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal




"US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
(CNSNews.com) – U.S. forces carried out retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias overnight Thursday following a rocket attack on an Iraqi base that killed two U.S. troops...

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

‘That gave them something to think about’
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?



Because the Muslim former-President, identified as a vassal of Iran, is no longer in charge.

Only a moron like you would be unable to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization.


BTW....Iran never stopped enriching uranium.....Obama saw to that by making certain that there were no inspections.
You didn't know that?

Add it to that vast list of other things you don't know.
So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. Seems like things have actually gotten worse.

Do you KNOW Iran never stopped enriching uranium or do you just assume it because 'there were no inspections'? Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean since the deal read:
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, continuously monitor Iran's declared nuclear sites and also verify that no fissile material is moved covertly to a secret location to build a bomb.

Iran also agreed to implement the Additional Protocol to their IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which allows inspectors to access any site anywhere in the country they deem suspicious.
You should be aware that there are many ways we have to monitor foreign countries that do not involve having boots on their ground.
 
Every day, in so very many ways, the objective observer realized what a spectacular mistake it was to elect a President based on skin color.

Here's one dispositive comparison:


"Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal
...Obama infamously drew a "red line" with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria only to back away from it, and we now know why.

Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon, who recently wrote a book called "The Iran Wars," told MSNBC on Monday that the Obama administration's determination to close the Iran nuclear deal is to blame for the failure to act on its own red line in Syria."

Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal




"US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
(CNSNews.com) – U.S. forces carried out retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias overnight Thursday following a rocket attack on an Iraqi base that killed two U.S. troops...

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

‘That gave them something to think about’
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?



Because the Muslim former-President, identified as a vassal of Iran, is no longer in charge.

Only a moron like you would be unable to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization.


BTW....Iran never stopped enriching uranium.....Obama saw to that by making certain that there were no inspections.
You didn't know that?

Add it to that vast list of other things you don't know.
So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. Seems like things have actually gotten worse.

Do you KNOW Iran never stopped enriching uranium or do you just assume it because 'there were no inspections'? Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean since the deal read:
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, continuously monitor Iran's declared nuclear sites and also verify that no fissile material is moved covertly to a secret location to build a bomb.

Iran also agreed to implement the Additional Protocol to their IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which allows inspectors to access any site anywhere in the country they deem suspicious.
You should be aware that there are many ways we have to monitor foreign countries that do not involve having boots on their ground.



"So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. "


Sure thing...after all, it's my raison d'être ....



1. Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote, saying "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


2. After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"




The first is an attack on America, the second, on all of Western Civilization.

BTW......more proof that Hussein was Iran's vassal....
3. Obama prevented the DEA from stopping Hezbollah from selling cocaine in the US. The money was used for IED's to kill American soldiers.
Clear and evident obstruction of justice.
 
Every day, in so very many ways, the objective observer realized what a spectacular mistake it was to elect a President based on skin color.

Here's one dispositive comparison:


"Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal
...Obama infamously drew a "red line" with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria only to back away from it, and we now know why.

Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon, who recently wrote a book called "The Iran Wars," told MSNBC on Monday that the Obama administration's determination to close the Iran nuclear deal is to blame for the failure to act on its own red line in Syria."

Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal




"US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
(CNSNews.com) – U.S. forces carried out retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias overnight Thursday following a rocket attack on an Iraqi base that killed two U.S. troops...

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

‘That gave them something to think about’
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?



Because the Muslim former-President, identified as a vassal of Iran, is no longer in charge.

Only a moron like you would be unable to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization.


BTW....Iran never stopped enriching uranium.....Obama saw to that by making certain that there were no inspections.
You didn't know that?

Add it to that vast list of other things you don't know.
So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. Seems like things have actually gotten worse.

Do you KNOW Iran never stopped enriching uranium or do you just assume it because 'there were no inspections'? Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean since the deal read:
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, continuously monitor Iran's declared nuclear sites and also verify that no fissile material is moved covertly to a secret location to build a bomb.

Iran also agreed to implement the Additional Protocol to their IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which allows inspectors to access any site anywhere in the country they deem suspicious.
You should be aware that there are many ways we have to monitor foreign countries that do not involve having boots on their ground.



"So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. "


Sure thing...after all, it's my raison d'être ....



1. Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote, saying "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


2. After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"




The first is an attack on America, the second, on all of Western Civilization.

BTW......more proof that Hussein was Iran's vassal....
3. Obama prevented the DEA from stopping Hezbollah from selling cocaine in the US. The money was used for IED's to kill American soldiers.
Clear and evident obstruction of justice.
I get it, you think Obama was bad but you're failing in your raison d'être. You have not even attempted to show that, as bad as things with Iran were under Obama, things are better under Trump.

The question you steadfastly refuse to answer:
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?
 
Obama will go down as one the best Potus, while tramp will go down as one of the worst.
 
Every day, in so very many ways, the objective observer realized what a spectacular mistake it was to elect a President based on skin color.

Here's one dispositive comparison:


"Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal
...Obama infamously drew a "red line" with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria only to back away from it, and we now know why.

Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon, who recently wrote a book called "The Iran Wars," told MSNBC on Monday that the Obama administration's determination to close the Iran nuclear deal is to blame for the failure to act on its own red line in Syria."

Obama reportedly declined to enforce red line in Syria after Iran threatened to back out of nuclear deal




"US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
(CNSNews.com) – U.S. forces carried out retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Iraqi militias overnight Thursday following a rocket attack on an Iraqi base that killed two U.S. troops...

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

‘That gave them something to think about’
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?



Because the Muslim former-President, identified as a vassal of Iran, is no longer in charge.

Only a moron like you would be unable to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization.


BTW....Iran never stopped enriching uranium.....Obama saw to that by making certain that there were no inspections.
You didn't know that?

Add it to that vast list of other things you don't know.
So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. Seems like things have actually gotten worse.

Do you KNOW Iran never stopped enriching uranium or do you just assume it because 'there were no inspections'? Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean since the deal read:
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, continuously monitor Iran's declared nuclear sites and also verify that no fissile material is moved covertly to a secret location to build a bomb.

Iran also agreed to implement the Additional Protocol to their IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which allows inspectors to access any site anywhere in the country they deem suspicious.
You should be aware that there are many ways we have to monitor foreign countries that do not involve having boots on their ground.



"So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. "


Sure thing...after all, it's my raison d'être ....



1. Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote, saying "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


2. After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"




The first is an attack on America, the second, on all of Western Civilization.

BTW......more proof that Hussein was Iran's vassal....
3. Obama prevented the DEA from stopping Hezbollah from selling cocaine in the US. The money was used for IED's to kill American soldiers.
Clear and evident obstruction of justice.
I get it, you think Obama was bad but you're failing in your raison d'être. You have not even attempted to show that, as bad as things with Iran were under Obama, things are better under Trump.

The question you steadfastly refuse to answer:
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?


(Pssssssst.....I don't actually expect to accomplish my mission with you....you're a lost cause....but you allow me to prove to others how ignorant you government school grads are.
It's the purpose you were born to serve.)
 
“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
------------------------------------------
Maybe we should just let the military come home. What is your thinking on it? More killing.
 
Tramp left Syria and Turkey's border due to his buildings in Turkey.
 
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?



Because the Muslim former-President, identified as a vassal of Iran, is no longer in charge.

Only a moron like you would be unable to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization.


BTW....Iran never stopped enriching uranium.....Obama saw to that by making certain that there were no inspections.
You didn't know that?

Add it to that vast list of other things you don't know.
So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. Seems like things have actually gotten worse.

Do you KNOW Iran never stopped enriching uranium or do you just assume it because 'there were no inspections'? Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean since the deal read:
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, continuously monitor Iran's declared nuclear sites and also verify that no fissile material is moved covertly to a secret location to build a bomb.

Iran also agreed to implement the Additional Protocol to their IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which allows inspectors to access any site anywhere in the country they deem suspicious.
You should be aware that there are many ways we have to monitor foreign countries that do not involve having boots on their ground.



"So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. "


Sure thing...after all, it's my raison d'être ....



1. Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote, saying "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


2. After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"




The first is an attack on America, the second, on all of Western Civilization.

BTW......more proof that Hussein was Iran's vassal....
3. Obama prevented the DEA from stopping Hezbollah from selling cocaine in the US. The money was used for IED's to kill American soldiers.
Clear and evident obstruction of justice.
I get it, you think Obama was bad but you're failing in your raison d'être. You have not even attempted to show that, as bad as things with Iran were under Obama, things are better under Trump.

The question you steadfastly refuse to answer:
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?


(Pssssssst.....I don't actually expect to accomplish my mission with you....you're a lost cause....but you allow me to prove to others how ignorant you government school grads are.
It's the purpose you were born to serve.)

If the student hasn’t learned, the teacher hasn’t taught.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” said Defense Secretary Mark Esper after the strikes. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”
US Attacks Iran-Backed Militia Hours After General Refers to US Fatalities as 'Red Line'
------------------------------------------
Maybe we should just let the military come home. What is your thinking on it? More killing.



When America is removed from the world, chaos entails and evil fills the vacuum.
 
Because the Muslim former-President, identified as a vassal of Iran, is no longer in charge.

Only a moron like you would be unable to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization.


BTW....Iran never stopped enriching uranium.....Obama saw to that by making certain that there were no inspections.
You didn't know that?

Add it to that vast list of other things you don't know.
So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. Seems like things have actually gotten worse.

Do you KNOW Iran never stopped enriching uranium or do you just assume it because 'there were no inspections'? Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean since the deal read:
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, continuously monitor Iran's declared nuclear sites and also verify that no fissile material is moved covertly to a secret location to build a bomb.

Iran also agreed to implement the Additional Protocol to their IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which allows inspectors to access any site anywhere in the country they deem suspicious.
You should be aware that there are many ways we have to monitor foreign countries that do not involve having boots on their ground.



"So help a moron like me to see the advantage to America and Western Civilization. "


Sure thing...after all, it's my raison d'être ....



1. Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote, saying "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


2. After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"




The first is an attack on America, the second, on all of Western Civilization.

BTW......more proof that Hussein was Iran's vassal....
3. Obama prevented the DEA from stopping Hezbollah from selling cocaine in the US. The money was used for IED's to kill American soldiers.
Clear and evident obstruction of justice.
I get it, you think Obama was bad but you're failing in your raison d'être. You have not even attempted to show that, as bad as things with Iran were under Obama, things are better under Trump.

The question you steadfastly refuse to answer:
So now Iran and the US are back to killing each other's people, Asad has recaptured most rebel-held territory, and Iran is back to enriching uranium. How are we better off now?


(Pssssssst.....I don't actually expect to accomplish my mission with you....you're a lost cause....but you allow me to prove to others how ignorant you government school grads are.
It's the purpose you were born to serve.)

If the student hasn’t learned, the teacher hasn’t taught.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



I sure hope you apply that to every Democrat/Liberal controlled government school.

Have you seen the marks American student's get on international exams?



So you're a government school grad, huh?
 
Tramp left Syria and Turkey's border due to his buildings in Turkey.
Trump doesn't own buildings in Turkey, dumbass.

Right he just markets his name for a fee:
The construction—made up of two conjoined towers—opened in 2012 and is one of seven current Trump Towers locations. Following the ribbon-cutting ceremony in April of that year, Ivanka tweeted, "Thank you Prime Minister Erdogan for joining us yesterday to celebrate the launch of #TrumpTowers Istanbul!"

The Trump Organization does not own the building, but instead Trump gave permission for the project's Turkish owners to use his name in exchange for a fee. Regardless, the president has described Trump Towers Istanbul as "a little conflict of interest" in his dealings with Turkey.
Ivanka photo resurfaces showing Trump in Istanbul to open new luxury towers
 
Tramp left Syria and Turkey's border due to his buildings in Turkey.
Trump doesn't own buildings in Turkey, dumbass.

Right he just markets his name for a fee:
The construction—made up of two conjoined towers—opened in 2012 and is one of seven current Trump Towers locations. Following the ribbon-cutting ceremony in April of that year, Ivanka tweeted, "Thank you Prime Minister Erdogan for joining us yesterday to celebrate the launch of #TrumpTowers Istanbul!"

The Trump Organization does not own the building, but instead Trump gave permission for the project's Turkish owners to use his name in exchange for a fee. Regardless, the president has described Trump Towers Istanbul as "a little conflict of interest" in his dealings with Turkey.
Ivanka photo resurfaces showing Trump in Istanbul to open new luxury towers
And of course the only thing that proves is that President Trump has such a stellar reputation that he can charge people millions of dollars to put his name on their buildings.
 
Tramp left Syria and Turkey's border due to his buildings in Turkey.
Trump doesn't own buildings in Turkey, dumbass.

Right he just markets his name for a fee:
The construction—made up of two conjoined towers—opened in 2012 and is one of seven current Trump Towers locations. Following the ribbon-cutting ceremony in April of that year, Ivanka tweeted, "Thank you Prime Minister Erdogan for joining us yesterday to celebrate the launch of #TrumpTowers Istanbul!"

The Trump Organization does not own the building, but instead Trump gave permission for the project's Turkish owners to use his name in exchange for a fee. Regardless, the president has described Trump Towers Istanbul as "a little conflict of interest" in his dealings with Turkey.
Ivanka photo resurfaces showing Trump in Istanbul to open new luxury towers
And of course the only thing that proves is that President Trump has such a stellar reputation that he can charge people millions of dollars to put his name on their buildings.

Apparently not as Erdogan wanted it removed, and many people have removed the name off his marketed buildings.
 
Tramp left Syria and Turkey's border due to his buildings in Turkey.
Trump doesn't own buildings in Turkey, dumbass.

Right he just markets his name for a fee:
The construction—made up of two conjoined towers—opened in 2012 and is one of seven current Trump Towers locations. Following the ribbon-cutting ceremony in April of that year, Ivanka tweeted, "Thank you Prime Minister Erdogan for joining us yesterday to celebrate the launch of #TrumpTowers Istanbul!"

The Trump Organization does not own the building, but instead Trump gave permission for the project's Turkish owners to use his name in exchange for a fee. Regardless, the president has described Trump Towers Istanbul as "a little conflict of interest" in his dealings with Turkey.
Ivanka photo resurfaces showing Trump in Istanbul to open new luxury towers
And of course the only thing that proves is that President Trump has such a stellar reputation that he can charge people millions of dollars to put his name on their buildings.

Apparently not as Erdogan wanted it removed, and many people have removed the name off his marketed buildings.

which proves that Erdogan is a shifty dog--------serves tea, kisses his guests ----
and then stabs them in the back. (and he is not even an arab)
 

Forum List

Back
Top