NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
The real difference is, and why I find your posts most disingenuous, is that Israel is not targeting children as you so well imply.
How many missiles must Israel endure? How many of their children must be purposely kidnapped and murdered before they defend themselves? The Jews brought prosperity to a little strip of land that was laid waste by the Arabs. Israel was willing to live in peace with the Muslims, it was the Muslims that started the fight.
I have to wonder what is the problem people like you have with the stronger nation defending itself against a weaker nation that is firing missiles into the stronger country. Is it, in this case, just anti-Semitism? Sure seems that way.
Israel is an OCCUPIER. By force. This is what happens to occupiers.
Occupier of what? Again your anti-Semitism rears its very ugly face. Do you disagree with the UN when they agreed to the lands that were made the state of Israel? How much of the US do you want to give back to whomever because the land was pretty much taken like all land was taken by someone? What do you think gives Muslims the right to the land any more then the Jews? Because the Ottoman Turks took the land by force?
The UN decided that the land belonged to Israel and had not the Arab states attacked Israel then the land taken by Israel would not have happened. But the Arabs did attack and Israel won.
I want you to describe to me the manner in which someone can disagree with Israeli policy without qualifying in your mind as anti-semitic.