Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 79,598
- 84,101
- 3,615
Numbers, unlike tRumplings, don't lie.Wrong.Swine flu had a mortality rate of 0.02%. Coronavirus is over 100 times worse.Five months into the swine flu here there was no rapid test for H1N1 and the tests they had were only 10-70% accurate depending on the test.-
How well can these tests detect the flu?
Rapid tests vary in their ability to detect flu viruses. Depending on the test used, their ability to detect 2009 H1N1 flu can range from 10% to 70%. This means that some people with a 2009 H1N1 flu infection have had a negative rapid test result. (This situation is called a false negative test result.) Rapid tests appear to be better at detecting flu in children than adults. None of the rapid tests currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are able to distinguish 2009 H1N1 flu from other flu viruses.
Will my health care pr
Are you aware that H1N1 killed about the same amount of people in a year as COVID-19 did in a couple of months before it even takes off?
Why, I remember a time when you guys were calling Obama a failure because of it. That was cute. What was H1N1's mortality rate anyway?