martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 86,240
- 36,284
- 2,300
Does that case have to do with President Joe Biden being convicted of 34 felonies?
It has to do with the trope of "respect all courts and juries" and the fallacy of such a broad stroke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does that case have to do with President Joe Biden being convicted of 34 felonies?
That's a fucking lie.
You can change my mind a bit if you admit the trial was rigged from the beginning. If not, it 's not only only not a lie that Democrats don't care but they condone it.
So, you want respect from a segment of the population that you don't respect.Former Maryland governor and U.S. Senate candidate Larry Hogan urged Americans to stay calm and respect the nation's legal process amid the conviction of former President Donald Trump on Thursday.
Hogan posted on social media just minutes before a New York jury found former President Trump guilty of 34 felony counts related to a hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels.
Hogan calls for Americans to 'respect' Trump's guilty verdict
Hogan posted on social media just minutes before a New York jury found former President Trump guilty.wjla.com
yes, well we knew the cult would not take that rational response lightly.
A top Trump advisor warned Maryland Republican Larry Hogan that his Senate campaign in the state is over after the state's former governor told voters to "respect the verdict."
On the news this morning the Republican sheep are out in force attacking Hogan.
Do you Remember when Pubs called themselves the law and order party and told everyone to respect the outcomes of jury trials?
Those days are dead and gone.
You’re celebrating a sham trial held for the purpose of eliminating a political rival. Other than deranged leftists, everyone sees his for what it is.
It was not rigged. It sat for 4 years, because you can't indict a sitting president. He was indicted months after leaving office, and he has used every legal trick in the book to delay, delay, delay. He didnt want these trials to happen before he could get re-elected, and for America to see the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.You can change my mind a bit if you admit the trial was rigged from the beginning. If not, it 's not only only not a lie that Democrats don't care but they condone it.
Sorry, not doing Red Herrings today.It has to do with the trope of "respect all courts and juries" and the fallacy of such a broad stroke.
It is a statement of fact, which is false. Therefore, a lie.That is an opinion which cannot be a lie.
If you think what Marty said is a 'red herring' and what you have been posting isn't, hey I still have all those pretty bridges to sell. . .Sorry, not doing Red Herrings today.
You are really brainwashed. This was a big nothingburger issue, which was perverted by a partisan prosecutor and partisan judge. The judge was so determined to “get Trump”:It was not rigged. It sat for 4 years, because you can't indict a sitting president. He was indicted months after leaving office, and he has used every legal trick in the book to delay, delay, delay. He didnt want these trials to happen before he could get re-elected, and for America to see the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
Having mine right now!When this bites you dumbasses in your well used asses in November I am going to light up a Cigar and laugh.
Trump has control of the RNC and can withhold Party funds and endorsements
The jury knew that Cohen is a convicted perjurer. That’s all that they need to know. The jury gets to decide for themselves if they believe him or not. The judge has no part in that.that he didn’t even tell the jury to disregard the testimony of the convicted perjurer, who had just perjured himself AGAIN right on the witness stand
They did. It was all handled in pre-trial motions.they didn’t tell Trump what the underlying crime was until the jury was given instructions, and then it was a litany of “possibilities” from which they could choose
He blocked their testimony properly. The judge determines issues of law, not the witnesses.the judge blocked the expert defense witness who would have explained that Trump violated no election campaign law
Gag orders are consistent with the first amendment because they are narrowly tailored to defend the judicial process. Trump appealed the gag order and it was largely upheld.the judge violated Trump’s First Amendment rights by silencing him with a gag order (libs always revert to silencing people), and abusing the defense witnesses, and allowed a prostitute to go on and on with irrelevant crap simply to embarrass Trump.
Hogan would be like Manchin in West VirginiaHogan really would only be marginally useful to the Republicans in the Senate.
I don't think he'd be that reliable in confirming President Trump's choices for the courts or other positions.
Considering there are only limited funds available, it would be better for the Republicans to invest in flipping the seat in West Virginia.
Sorry, not doing Red Herrings today.
Hogan would be like Manchin in West Virginia
Someone who supports the party 80 percent of the time
Cohen is regarded as an accomplice in this case. Therefore the law treats him differently.that he didn’t even tell the jury to disregard the testimony of the convicted perjurer,
Pre-mature celebration, which probably rhymes with another issue you have.
Seems you know quite a bit about the issue.
Maybe you and convicted felon P01135809 and pool your money together and pay for piece of *ss.
The only way you can get some!