TheGreatGatsby
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #61
The government religious left nutters drinking from the pope's glass
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Just another example of nuttiness from the relgious left"
Just another example of the ridiculous right and the OP's ignorance of a composition fallacy.
You're an idiot who doesn't understand fallacies or bold face lies and shouldn't even bother wasting our time even spouting them.
---
"The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part)."
.
Any more pointless definitions you'd like to spout?
"Just another example of nuttiness from the relgious left"
Just another example of the ridiculous right and the OP's ignorance of a composition fallacy.
You're an idiot who doesn't understand fallacies or bold face lies and shouldn't even bother wasting our time even spouting them.
---
"The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part)."
.
Any more pointless definitions you'd like to spout?
---
You did not understand your fallacy, so i helped you.
If you still don't understand, then it was pointless.
The "nuttiness from the relgious left" is only half the religious "nuttiness".
Your example was definitely an example of hero worship!
.
Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
"Just another example of nuttiness from the relgious left"
Just another example of the ridiculous right and the OP's ignorance of a composition fallacy.
You're an idiot who doesn't understand fallacies or bold face lies and shouldn't even bother wasting our time even spouting them.
---
"The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part)."
.
Any more pointless definitions you'd like to spout?
---
You did not understand your fallacy, so i helped you.
If you still don't understand, then it was pointless.
The "nuttiness from the relgious left" is only half the religious "nuttiness".
Your example was definitely an example of hero worship!
.
It's only half the religious nuttiness? Do you refer to the so-called religious right as the other half? And I don't know whom I'm supposed to be "hero worshiping." Go ahead and clarify that one.
Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
---
Yes, he is an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
I'm convinced, however, there are others likeminded in the Repub Party who hide it, which is a good thing in this case.
.

Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
---
Yes, he is an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
I'm convinced, however, there are others likeminded in the Repub Party who hide it, which is a good thing in this case.
.
Yes, but we are talking about this particular congressman now.![]()
Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
---
Yes, he is an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
I'm convinced, however, there are others likeminded in the Repub Party who hide it, which is a good thing in this case.
.
Yes, but we are talking about this particular congressman now.![]()

Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
---
Yes, he is an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
I'm convinced, however, there are others likeminded in the Repub Party who hide it, which is a good thing in this case.
.
Yes, but we are talking about this particular congressman now.![]()
You have literally hundreds of Republicans serving who are religiously butthurt over gay marriage. The fact that this guy is drinking the pope's backwash is about as relevant as chomping on Christ's body in the form of a cracker. It amounts to nothing.
Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
---
Yes, he is an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
I'm convinced, however, there are others likeminded in the Repub Party who hide it, which is a good thing in this case.
.
Yes, but we are talking about this particular congressman now.![]()
You have literally hundreds of Republicans serving who are religiously butthurt over gay marriage. The fact that this guy is drinking the pope's backwash is about as relevant as chomping on Christ's body in the form of a cracker. It amounts to nothing.
Nothing to do with gays or race ...etc........please a break from that for a second or two ok?
I guess it was the fervor with which he grabbed the cup and started making his relatives drink from it.....there is something actually very sick and disturbing about it!
meh...what do I know
No that's Hank Johnson from Georgia.Is that the same Dem who thought and island was going to capsize?
You're an idiot who doesn't understand fallacies or bold face lies and shouldn't even bother wasting our time even spouting them.
---
"The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part)."
.
Any more pointless definitions you'd like to spout?
---
You did not understand your fallacy, so i helped you.
If you still don't understand, then it was pointless.
The "nuttiness from the relgious left" is only half the religious "nuttiness".
Your example was definitely an example of hero worship!
.
It's only half the religious nuttiness? Do you refer to the so-called religious right as the other half? And I don't know whom I'm supposed to be "hero worshiping." Go ahead and clarify that one.
---
Anyone who worships an invisible "God" and its alleged "prophet" and/or preacher is "nutty", in my opinion.
I understand the "right" has a lot of god/hero worshippers too, no?
.
---
"The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part)."
.
Any more pointless definitions you'd like to spout?
---
You did not understand your fallacy, so i helped you.
If you still don't understand, then it was pointless.
The "nuttiness from the relgious left" is only half the religious "nuttiness".
Your example was definitely an example of hero worship!
.
It's only half the religious nuttiness? Do you refer to the so-called religious right as the other half? And I don't know whom I'm supposed to be "hero worshiping." Go ahead and clarify that one.
---
Anyone who worships an invisible "God" and its alleged "prophet" and/or preacher is "nutty", in my opinion.
I understand the "right" has a lot of god/hero worshippers too, no?
.
The alleged numbers on each side is irrelevant, Mr. Moron.
Any more pointless definitions you'd like to spout?
---
You did not understand your fallacy, so i helped you.
If you still don't understand, then it was pointless.
The "nuttiness from the relgious left" is only half the religious "nuttiness".
Your example was definitely an example of hero worship!
.
It's only half the religious nuttiness? Do you refer to the so-called religious right as the other half? And I don't know whom I'm supposed to be "hero worshiping." Go ahead and clarify that one.
---
Anyone who worships an invisible "God" and its alleged "prophet" and/or preacher is "nutty", in my opinion.
I understand the "right" has a lot of god/hero worshippers too, no?
.
The alleged numbers on each side is irrelevant, Mr. Moron.
Of course it's relevant otherwise "Democratic Congressmen" wouldn't have been the first two words you typed after copying and pasting the link in your OP. Be serious, you're not fooling anyone, just own it.
EDIT: I mean, Jesus Christ, look at your thread title "Just another example of nuttiness from the relgious left", that's begging for a comparison with Conservatives but I'd guess you know you aren't going to fair that well and are trying to quelch that argument before it starts.
Remember that conservative asshat who thought god has a way of "shutting that down" when it came to rape? Wow, talk about crazy wingnut religious conservatives, amiright?
---
You did not understand your fallacy, so i helped you.
If you still don't understand, then it was pointless.
The "nuttiness from the relgious left" is only half the religious "nuttiness".
Your example was definitely an example of hero worship!
.
It's only half the religious nuttiness? Do you refer to the so-called religious right as the other half? And I don't know whom I'm supposed to be "hero worshiping." Go ahead and clarify that one.
---
Anyone who worships an invisible "God" and its alleged "prophet" and/or preacher is "nutty", in my opinion.
I understand the "right" has a lot of god/hero worshippers too, no?
.
The alleged numbers on each side is irrelevant, Mr. Moron.
Of course it's relevant otherwise "Democratic Congressmen" wouldn't have been the first two words you typed after copying and pasting the link in your OP. Be serious, you're not fooling anyone, just own it.
EDIT: I mean, Jesus Christ, look at your thread title "Just another example of nuttiness from the relgious left", that's begging for a comparison with Conservatives but I'd guess you know you aren't going to fair that well and are trying to quelch that argument before it starts.
Remember that conservative asshat who thought god has a way of "shutting that down" when it came to rape? Wow, talk about crazy wingnut religious conservatives, amiright?
Having a good cry, little girl? That's Democrats putting this guy in office. Clearly, your party has plenty of religious nutters. Don't worry though; he worships Obama like you do, still.
That was a bit disturbing if not just slightly odd but think about this.Did the congressman think he was going to win the lotto drinking from that cup?
or to get eternal salvation or something?
frankly.... a grown man doing that nonsense....tst tst ts....![]()
---
Yes, he is an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
I'm convinced, however, there are others likeminded in the Repub Party who hide it, which is a good thing in this case.
.
Yes, but we are talking about this particular congressman now.![]()
You have literally hundreds of Republicans serving who are religiously butthurt over gay marriage. The fact that this guy is drinking the pope's backwash is about as relevant as chomping on Christ's body in the form of a cracker. It amounts to nothing.
Nothing to do with gays or race ...etc........please a break from that for a second or two ok?
I guess it was the fervor with which he grabbed the cup and started making his relatives drink from it.....there is something actually very sick and disturbing about it!
meh...what do I know
It's only half the religious nuttiness? Do you refer to the so-called religious right as the other half? And I don't know whom I'm supposed to be "hero worshiping." Go ahead and clarify that one.
---
Anyone who worships an invisible "God" and its alleged "prophet" and/or preacher is "nutty", in my opinion.
I understand the "right" has a lot of god/hero worshippers too, no?
.
The alleged numbers on each side is irrelevant, Mr. Moron.
Of course it's relevant otherwise "Democratic Congressmen" wouldn't have been the first two words you typed after copying and pasting the link in your OP. Be serious, you're not fooling anyone, just own it.
EDIT: I mean, Jesus Christ, look at your thread title "Just another example of nuttiness from the relgious left", that's begging for a comparison with Conservatives but I'd guess you know you aren't going to fair that well and are trying to quelch that argument before it starts.
Remember that conservative asshat who thought god has a way of "shutting that down" when it came to rape? Wow, talk about crazy wingnut religious conservatives, amiright?
Having a good cry, little girl? That's Democrats putting this guy in office. Clearly, your party has plenty of religious nutters. Don't worry though; he worships Obama like you do, still.
Sorry, I don't see how this guy represents the religious beliefs of a big tent party. Kim Davis on the other hand or Michelle Bachmann or Mike Huckabee would love for the rest of us to drink from their godly chalice. But let's ignore all of that, we have a religious southerner who is drinking out of the pope's glass. if you think this means anything then you're pretty shallow.
Then again, look who I'm talking to, somebody who has to remind everyone else in every post that they "burn" people and whatnot.