Jury Selection Completed in Karmelo Anthony Trial for Murder – Opening Statements Tomorrow

Since it’s supposed the a jury of his peers, I’d expect them to round up 12 black convicts from the local prison. He’s sure to be acquitted.
Sort of like the OJ jury that loved them some of that nullification. If this holds, we may well see the first Sharia trial in a few years. this is the melting pot.
 
"Jury Selection Completed in Karmelo Anthony Trial for Murder – Opening Statements Tomorrow
Karmelo Anthony, who is black, was arrested in 2025 after he stabbed and killed Austin Metcalf, who is white, at a track meet at Kuykendall Stadium in Frisco, Texas. Karmelo has been charged with first-degree murder: the unlawful killing of another, with malice aforethought and specific intent.

In the past several days 600 people were reviewed to generate a potential pool of 250 jurors. The 250 were further whittled down to 12 with six alternates. The jury selection is over and the opening statements in the trial will likely begin tomorrow. The jury will not be sequestered during trial.

The killing is not being disputed by the defense, there were dozens of witnesses to the murder. However, the defense is claiming ‘stand your ground’ and ‘self-defense’ as justification for the killing. The defense is also promoting a motive of racism for everything surrounding the event between Metcalf and Anthony and throughout the pre-trial motions and public positioning."










No blacks are on the jury. Three were removed from the pool by the prosecution. Apparently, one said he couldn't send a black man to prison.
The prosecutor said they were educators and their jobs were too similar to the circumstances around the crime.

Race, race, race—the defendant, the jurors, the attorneys. Once again, demographics take center stage while the evidence takes a back seat — focused more on who people are instead of whether a crime was committed.
 
you obviously don't understand how jury selection works, FatIrishSow.

You can't pick a juror you like, you can only challenge one you don't like.

The prosecution eliminated every black juror. Not a good look if this kid is convicted by an all-white jury


Rittenhouse didn't have any injuries, either, when he gunned down three people.

If this kid gets convicted while Rittenhouse walked, you can chalk it up to racism.
You’ve already decided why the verdict will be wrong before a verdict even exists.

Your premise is grounded in judging one case by the outcome of an unrelated one rather than by the facts, evidence, and circumstances of each case.
 
Race, race, race—the defendant, the jurors, the attorneys. Once again, demographics take center stage while the evidence takes a back seat — focused more on who people are instead of whether a crime was committed.
Crazy incidents and repeated emotional response stirred up by a media with an agenda lead to terrible laws. This is how we end up with a state (then federal) law with a cute name for the "victim" like Karmelo's Law, where it is illegal to demonstrate any disrespecting to someone that would reasonably be considered objectionable to a person of color.
 
That "black" kid belongs in prison. You must have missed the part where he brought a knife to a high-school track meet and murdered another kid. It's people like you that keep racism alive and well.

The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Did you guys keep forgetting that's something you advocate?

If it's okay for Rittenhouse to shoot an unarmed homeless person half his size, and then shoot his way out of a crowd of bystanders trying to detain him for the cops, then you can't have a complaint when these two kids got stabbed after shoving a black kid twice.

Have some intellectual consistency
 
Colin County, Texas is 11% black...of the 600 randomly chosen prospective jurors, only 3 were black.

If it were random, then 66 of the prospective jurors should have been black, and at least 2 of them should have gotten on the jury.

Yeah, the violent little shit that stabbed an unarmed kid to death for no reason is going to hopefully get life.

Funny, you didn't have the same attitude when that violent little shit Rittenhouse shot two unarmed people and injured a third.

Ah, but he was WHITE.

Silly Darky. Rights are for White People.
 
"Jury Selection Completed in Karmelo Anthony Trial for Murder – Opening Statements Tomorrow
Karmelo Anthony, who is black, was arrested in 2025 after he stabbed and killed Austin Metcalf, who is white, at a track meet at Kuykendall Stadium in Frisco, Texas. Karmelo has been charged with first-degree murder: the unlawful killing of another, with malice aforethought and specific intent.

In the past several days 600 people were reviewed to generate a potential pool of 250 jurors. The 250 were further whittled down to 12 with six alternates. The jury selection is over and the opening statements in the trial will likely begin tomorrow. The jury will not be sequestered during trial.

The killing is not being disputed by the defense, there were dozens of witnesses to the murder. However, the defense is claiming ‘stand your ground’ and ‘self-defense’ as justification for the killing. The defense is also promoting a motive of racism for everything surrounding the event between Metcalf and Anthony and throughout the pre-trial motions and public positioning."










No blacks are on the jury. Three were removed from the pool by the prosecution. Apparently, one said he couldn't send a black man to prison.
The prosecutor said they were educators and their jobs were too similar to the circumstances around the crime.

I'm guessing a slap on the wrist, all said and done.
 
You’ve already decided why the verdict will be wrong before a verdict even exists.

Your premise is grounded in judging one case by the outcome of an unrelated one rather than by the facts, evidence, and circumstances of each case.

No, I'm going by precedent.

If Rittenhouse and Zimmerman can claim self-defense while shooting UNARMED people, this kid can claim self-defense when a couple of white thugs were pushing him around to show how tough they were.
 
No, I'm going by precedent.

If Rittenhouse and Zimmerman can claim self-defense while shooting UNARMED people, this kid can claim self-defense when a couple of white thugs were pushing him around to show how tough they were.
Good thing is you''re always wrong about these things probably due pathological damage.
 
That is not true. In cities there are many perps who get away with crimes at trials. We do not live in whitetopia like you spout. There are areas and neighborhoods though that are white. You ain't winning nothing destroying white. The yellow will destroy you. Every group in your party will be compliant when China is the power.
So your dumbass is telling us that when the jury is black, they just let the black person go free because they are black. Smfh.
 
you obviously don't understand how jury selection works, FatIrishSow.

You can't pick a juror you like, you can only challenge one you don't like.

The prosecution eliminated every black juror. Not a good look if this kid is convicted by an all-white jury


Rittenhouse didn't have any injuries, either, when he gunned down three people.

If this kid gets convicted while Rittenhouse walked, you can chalk it up to racism.
Throw the book at this piece of garbage who committed a hate crime and murdered an unarmed white man. Blacks have the highest murder rate in America and their culture supports violence as way to solve problems.
 
Throw the book at this piece of garbage who committed a hate crime and murdered an unarmed white man. Blacks have the highest murder rate in America and their culture supports violence as way to solve problems.
Amazing how it changes, Trayvon Martin was unarmed and a coward with a gun murdered him and you clowns were cheering.
 
15th post
Throw the book at this piece of garbage who committed a hate crime and murdered an unarmed white man. Blacks have the highest murder rate in America and their culture supports violence as way to solve problems.

Except the violence was started by the Metcalf brothers when they started pushing Anthony out of the tent.

IF Zimmerman and Rittenhouse should walk, this kid should walk.
 
Except the violence was started by the Metcalf brothers when they started pushing Anthony out of the tent.

IF Zimmerman and Rittenhouse should walk, this kid should walk.
He used deadly force when it wasnt needed. Lock his ass up for life.
Zimmerman and Rittenhouse had solid cases of use of deadly force.
 
The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Did you guys keep forgetting that's something you advocate?

If it's okay for Rittenhouse to shoot an unarmed homeless person half his size, and then shoot his way out of a crowd of bystanders trying to detain him for the cops, then you can't have a complaint when these two kids got stabbed after shoving a black kid twice.

Have some intellectual consistency
People like you truly are racists - this is the real issue. You dismiss the law and make decisions based on skin color. You quote law in the context of skin color to promote your agenda. Your entire argument starts with skin color.
 
The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Did you guys keep forgetting that's something you advocate?

If it's okay for Rittenhouse to shoot an unarmed homeless person half his size,

Rittenhouse is 5' 8" and Rosenbaum was 5' 3". They are both considered to be short and the difference is only five inches. Hardly "half his size".
and then shoot his way out of a crowd of bystanders trying to detain him for the cops, then you can't have a complaint when these two kids got stabbed after shoving a black kid twice.

The "crowd of bystanders" pulled a gun on him (Grosskreutz) and tried to stomp his head into the asphalt, among other things.
Have some intellectual consistency
Oh the irony.
 
Back
Top Bottom