Jury Selection Completed in Karmelo Anthony Trial for Murder – Opening Statements Tomorrow

[HikerGuy83]

Do we know what they spent that money on?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

When this quote from a juror after the trial indicates the quality of the jury "I don't know no DNA, DNA just means OJ gots blood". Then it IS a problem. That level of ignorance should never be allowed on a jury.

You pulled that BS out your ass.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

So, you believe Trayvon broken into a White person's home. Interesting.
Consider this. The most frequent victims of Black criminals are Black people.


What is your source for the "Zimmerman attacked an off duty cop" story?

George Zimmerman was arrested in 2005 for allegedly assaulting an undercover police officer.

No, Trayvon didn't break into anyone's house.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You pulled that BS out your ass.

nope it's a paraphrase of an actual statement from a juror after the trial "
According to transcripts and later juror interviews, several jurors expressed confusion or skepticism about DNA evidence. For example, one juror told reporters that DNA was “like a fingerprint” and that much of his understanding came from watching Jurassic Park and the Discovery Channel Famous Trials. Others openly questioned the reliability of the forensic work, particularly the testimony of crime scene investigator Dennis Fung, saying he was “sloppy” and therefore discredited the DNA evidence Reddit.

In the civil trial, jurors also struggled with the scientific nature of DNA. Some jurors admitted they didn’t fully grasp what DNA evidence meant, and a few explicitly said they didn’t believe it could link Simpson to the crime scene Famous Trials. This lack of understanding, combined with distrust of the investigators, meant that for some jurors, DNA evidence was irrelevant — to them, it just meant “O.J. gots blood,” which they didn’t see as proof of guilt.

The defense team, led by Johnnie Cochran, capitalized on this by arguing that the DNA evidence was unreliable and that reasonable doubt existed Wikipedia. This helped sway some jurors who were skeptical of forensic science, even though the prosecution’s case was otherwise strong."

 

[JoeB131]

He used deadly force when it wasnt needed. Lock his ass up for life.
Zimmerman and Rittenhouse had solid cases of use of deadly force.

Well, no, they didn't. They both provoked situations where deadly force was involved.

Zimmerman was SPECIFICALLY told by the 911 operator to NOT follow Trayvon.
Rittenhouse was violating curfew being out on the street with a gun.

 

[JoeB131]

Rittenhouse shot a child rapist, a rapist, and the third guy had a pistol that he was in the action of using.

Only 66% lies, that's an improvement for you.

 

[EdwinAMartin]

Rittenhouse was defending the nation from insurrectionists.

And himself from a Democrat pedophile.

 

[JoeB131]

nope it's a paraphrase of an actual statement from a juror after the trial "
According to transcripts and later juror interviews, several jurors expressed confusion or skepticism about DNA evidence. For example, one juror told reporters that DNA was “like a fingerprint” and that much of his understanding came from watching Jurassic Park and the Discovery Channel Famous Trials. Others openly questioned the reliability of the forensic work, particularly the testimony of crime scene investigator Dennis Fung, saying he was “sloppy” and therefore discredited the DNA evidence Reddit.

In the civil trial, jurors also struggled with the scientific nature of DNA. Some jurors admitted they didn’t fully grasp what DNA evidence meant, and a few explicitly said they didn’t believe it could link Simpson to the crime scene Famous Trials. This lack of understanding, combined with distrust of the investigators, meant that for some jurors, DNA evidence was irrelevant — to them, it just meant “O.J. gots blood,” which they didn’t see as proof of guilt.

The defense team, led by Johnnie Cochran, capitalized on this by arguing that the DNA evidence was unreliable and that reasonable doubt existed Wikipedia. This helped sway some jurors who were skeptical of forensic science, even though the prosecution’s case was otherwise strong."

The problem with the DNA issue wasn't whether or not the DNA came from Goldman, OJ, or Nicole.

The problem with it was that the evidence with the blood was all found by Mark Fuhrman (or as his fellow officers called him "Fuhrer-man". ) The same Mark Fuhrman who claimed he never, ever used the N-Word, and whoops, his ex-girlfriend has a bunch of tapes of him using the N-word.

Now, there were other factors. The Black Community being fed up with the LAPD's nonsense, and OJ's celebrity status. How could the funny guy from the Naked Gun Movies be a killer?

 

[DonGlock26]

George Zimmerman was arrested in 2005 for allegedly assaulting an undercover police officer.

No, Trayvon didn't break into anyone's house.

Source?

How do you know?

 

[westwall]

Only 66% lies, that's an improvement for you.

No, mr. Liar. Those are all facts.

You choose poorly.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Well, no, they didn't. They both provoked situations where deadly force was involved.

Zimmerman was SPECIFICALLY told by the 911 operator to NOT follow Trayvon.
Rittenhouse was violating curfew being out on the street with a gun.

Being out after curfew was provocation?

 

[Hafar1014]

Well, no, they didn't. They both provoked situations where deadly force was involved.

Zimmerman was SPECIFICALLY told by the 911 operator to NOT follow Trayvon.
Rittenhouse was violating curfew being out on the street with a gun.

Rittenhouse was in retreat when attacked by 4 men one armed with a glock, another hit him with a skateboard and he was kicked in the head by another. There was video that showed the entire event. The standard for use of deadly force was met. No gun violations where filed. 3 had criminal records.

Martin attacked Zimmerman while high on lean. Doesnt matter if he followed him. After Martin smashed his head into the concrete many times use of deadly force became awful.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Well, no, they didn't. They both provoked situations where deadly force was involved.

Zimmerman was SPECIFICALLY told by the 911 operator to NOT follow Trayvon.
Rittenhouse was violating curfew being out on the street with a gun.

You're lying again.

 

[Hafar1014]

You're lying again.

You're lying again.

Retreating when attacked first by multiple armed attackers is not provoking.
It doesnt matter what Zimmerman was told. He was attacked first
The law is the law juries have spoken both cases not guilty.
He is either lying or has no idea of the law

 

[Jarlaxle]

Retreating when attacked first by multiple armed attackers is not provoking.
It doesnt matter what Zimmerman was told. He was attacked first
The law is the law juries have spoken both cases not guilty.
He is either lying or has no idea of the law

Both. Joey is a propagandist.

 

[Hafar1014]

The problem with the DNA issue wasn't whether or not the DNA came from Goldman, OJ, or Nicole.

The problem with it was that the evidence with the blood was all found by Mark Fuhrman (or as his fellow officers called him "Fuhrer-man". ) The same Mark Fuhrman who claimed he never, ever used the N-Word, and whoops, his ex-girlfriend has a bunch of tapes of him using the N-word.

Now, there were other factors. The Black Community being fed up with the LAPD's nonsense, and OJ's celebrity status. How could the funny guy from the Naked Gun Movies be a killer?

OJ confessed to Rosevelt Grier who wasnt allowed to testify because he was member of the clergy

 

[JoeB131]

Rittenhouse was in retreat when attacked by 4 men one armed with a glock, another hit him with a skateboard and he was kicked in the head by another. There was video that showed the entire event. The standard for use of deadly force was met. No gun violations where filed. 3 had criminal records.

Um, no, he shot one unarmed man half his size, twice after he already went down. Then when the crowd tried to hold him for police, he shot his way out of the crowd, killing one man and wounding another.

The fact that these men had mild criminal records was irrelevant.

Martin attacked Zimmerman while high on lean. Doesnt matter if he followed him. After Martin smashed his head into the concrete many times use of deadly force became awful.

Except the only thing the autopsy found was that Martin had trace amounts of THC from past (not current) marijuana use.

I agree the use of deadly force there was 'awful'. He shot an unarmed kid after he provoked a confrontation.

Retreating when attacked first by multiple armed attackers is not provoking.
It doesnt matter what Zimmerman was told. He was attacked first
The law is the law juries have spoken both cases not guilty.
He is either lying or has no idea of the law

I agree, both juries decided that a nice white boy had a right to kill unarmed people in self-defense because they were really scared.

So if they don't grant Anthony the same consideration, it's racism.

OJ confessed to Rosevelt Grier who wasnt allowed to testify because he was member of the clergy

First, spell the name right, or at least use the name he's commonly known as.

Second, Grier never said anything of the sort. Guards said they heard him say that, but that was hearsay.

 

[buckeye]

Shasta County is 89% Non Minority

The trial is in Collin County.

 

[Hafar1014]

Um, no, he shot one unarmed man half his size, twice after he already went down. Then when the crowd tried to hold him for police, he shot his way out of the crowd, killing one man and wounding another.

The fact that these men had mild criminal records was irrelevant.




Except the only thing the autopsy found was that Martin had trace amounts of THC from past (not current) marijuana use.

I agree the use of deadly force there was 'awful'. He shot an unarmed kid after he provoked a confrontation.



I agree, both juries decided that a nice white boy had a right to kill unarmed people in self-defense because they were really scared.

So if they don't grant Anthony the same consideration, it's racism.



First, spell the name right, or at least use the name he's commonly known as.

Second, Grier never said anything of the sort. Guards said they heard him say that, but that was hearsay.

The juries have spoken and you lost move on.

 

[JoeB131]

The juries have spoken and you lost move on.

The men who murdered Emmit Till were acquitted, so does that make that okay?