Blaster
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2022
- 26,131
- 27,675
- 2,288
You go first.Try dealing in facts instead of hysteria.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You go first.Try dealing in facts instead of hysteria.
Of course it is. Public health is the government's job. If someone is lying in such a way to promote a death-causing epidemic, it is the government's job to point that out.
Who convinced you that teachers are doing that?
Biden isn't a socialist. Learn what the word means.You go first.
The teachers union is promoting this garbage.They're not even trying to hide it.
![]()
NY teacher forced girl, 9, to use male pronouns — causing suicidal thoughts: suit
A Long Island teacher allegedly “forced” a 5th-grade student to go by a male name and pronouns, confusing the child so much that she had suicidal thoughts.nypost.com
Everyone knows the difference between biology and psychology.
Apparently you don't know the difference.You don't even know the difference between a boy and a girl.
Of course it is.
Public health is the government's job. If someone is lying in such a way to promote a death-causing epidemic, it is the government's job to point that out.
And no, I don't believe in the PC "all viewpoints are equally valid" nonsense. Antivaxxer beliefs are dishonest and stupid, and it's good to point that out, even if it does trigger people.
Pointing out that someone is lying is not censoring them. Free speech cuts all ways.
The United States has had many epidemics in the past. This virus was new.No, it's not.
No. In this case the question becomes: Who is right, the government or the doctor?
THAT is why government should not get involved. The government gets it wrong just as often as the individual and their views are just as biased as anyone else's.
If this is true then it's also true that vaxxer beliefs are dishonest and stupid.
The government and Democrats initially touted the vaccine as a preventative. This turned out not to be true as the vaxxed started contracting Covid anyway.
So they changed the narrative to "The vaccine will prevent you from contracting it again." This also turned out not to be true as some that were vaxxed - as already mentioned - got infected anyway and then later contracted it again.
So the narrative changed again and they were forced to finally settle on "The vaccine alleviates symptoms and renders death less likely."
This much appears to be true but the point is, for two years, the government pushed a vaccine claiming it could do things it in fact could not, and did not do. Why? Because they didn't know.
They had no fucking idea what was true or not true about Covid or the vaccine but they pushed it anyway.
Why should I trust an entity that lies as much as anyone else to tell me what are lies and what are not? Understand?
THAT is why government should not get involved. The government gets it wrong just as often as the individual and their views are just as biased as anyone else's.
Everyone knows the difference between biology and psychology.
Would the term "Authoritarian Leftist Utilizing Identity Politics To Undermine Our Constitution And Usher In The Great Reset" suit you better?Biden isn't a socialist. Learn what the word means.
Where did you learn such harmful paranoid thinking? Is that Mormon?Especially when there are corrupt individuals within government that have a self-serving agenda to enrich and empower themselves to the harm of the public that they are supposed to serve. We certainly saw this very vividly demonstrated with the #CoronaHoax2020.
I tried to suggest the difference between biology and psychology, but no joy.Apparently not.
You see truth as harmful and paranoid?Where did you learn such harmful paranoid thinking? Is that Mormon?
I understand what you tried to do. You failed, like all of leftism, miserably.I tried to suggest the difference between biology and psychology, but no joy.
It's very simple, stupid.I understand what you tried to do. You failed, like all of leftism, miserably.
If a man presents without a penis, we rightly ask, "What went wrong?". Either he was involved in a horrific accident or was born with a horrible mutation. But you say, "Ahh, trans men don't have penises". If you have to qualify the term "Man", you're admitting they are not completely and totally men. Their bodies can be altered to look more masculine, but they're not men. And, one has to ask, how do they know they feel like a man when they are a woman and don't know how a man feels?No, but not just men can have a penis.
No, I'm not saying that trans men don't have a penis. Purely by accident you've started the appropriate conversation:If a man presents without a penis, we rightly ask, "What went wrong?". Either he was involved in a horrific accident or was born with a horrible mutation. But you say, "Ahh, trans men don't have penises". If you have to qualify the term "Man", you're admitting they are not completely and totally men. Their bodies can be altered to look more masculine, but they're not men. And, one has to ask, how do they know they feel like a man when they are a woman and don't know how a man feels?
or was born with a horrible mutation.