Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,879
- 60,287
- 2,645
The bail money?Kyle had over 2mil in his war chest to put up a defense..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The bail money?Kyle had over 2mil in his war chest to put up a defense..
Actually their behavior does excuse Rittenhouse’s actions.It does apply to them. But that doesn't excuse any of them, including Rittenhouse.
Bond....cash borrowed and secured by cash.The bail money?
And you attack me, without the facts, given I’ve repeatedly said EVERONE THERE WAS VIOLATING CURFEW SO WTF WERE THE POLICE DOING?if people had not been rioting and looting...
we can back this up a lot. if he violated curfew, so did everyone else.
you attack 1 side with facts, yes. but you dismiss those facts for the other side.
Well, he was, and pursuant to Wisconsin law, his actions do not preclude his self-defense claim.No, it means he should not have been there in the first place. For starters.
Being defunded.And you attack me, without the facts, given I’ve repeatedly said EVERONE THERE WAS VIOLATING CURFEW SO WTF WERE THE POLICE DOING?
Wrong, turd. He had every right to be there. If you were a decent human being, you'd be attacking the thugs who went after him, not Rittenhouse.No, it means he should not have been there in the first place. For starters.
How are facts "prejudicial?"Obviously prejudiced. Time to recuse. And even if he doesn't he just guaranteed a retrial because either side can use that as grounds to void the verdict.
No he hasn't, moron. He hasn't ruled on the issue yet.And the judge has already done so, in not dismissing the charges and in letting the trial proceed. The judge is already aware of exactly what the prosecution will argue. The defense, too.
You actually said who decides if he can be convicted based on the argument. And yes, that is now up to the jury. Not the judge.
This is correct. A lot of people in Kenosha were affected. "It's just arson" is a ridiculous statement.Doubtful. I think the judge is speaking to the idea that arson is a serious crime. he didn't appreciate the State saying "it's ONLY arson, geesh".
Bullshit, your side is all about defunding police and if they did anything to arrest them you’d help bail out the rioters. You aren’t fooling anyone.I blame the police first and foremost for allowing curfew to be violated
Not the behavior you just described. Sorry. But be as cutesy as you like.Actually their behavior does excuse Rittenhouse’s actions.
On what issue? Be specific. This appears to be another one of your episodes, where you get so rabid that you don't remember what you were squealing about.No he hasn't, moron. He hasn't ruled on the issue yet.
What about them chasing him down the street, trying to kill him?Not the behavior you just described. Sorry. But be as cutesy as you like.
Actually, they may. That's where your wrong. Thus the charges.
Yep. And the prosecution will be parading out witnesses that will describe Rittenhouse's bad behavior earlier in the evening.
Yes, of course thatWhat about them chasing him down the street, trying to kill him?
People who will testify he was aiming his gun at them, threatening them, etc.What bad behavior?
More like, went there with an expectation of violence. There illegally, possessing an illegal weapon, playing cop, etc.He broke curfew, thus he can't defend himself and deserves to die?
More like, went there with an expectation of violence. There illegally, possessing an illegal weapon, playing cop, etc.