JUDGE: Those Allegedly Shot By Rittenhouse Can’t Be Called ‘Victims’ During Trial, ‘Rioters’ And ‘Arsonists’ Both More Accurate

if people had not been rioting and looting...

we can back this up a lot. if he violated curfew, so did everyone else.

you attack 1 side with facts, yes. but you dismiss those facts for the other side.
And you attack me, without the facts, given I’ve repeatedly said EVERONE THERE WAS VIOLATING CURFEW SO WTF WERE THE POLICE DOING?

You totally ignore what. Is this a knee jerk reaction?

I blame the police first and foremost for allowing curfew to be violated, for inviting vigilantes in to do their job, and for allowing a 17 yr old illegally armed kid to be in that situation.
 
And the judge has already done so, in not dismissing the charges and in letting the trial proceed. The judge is already aware of exactly what the prosecution will argue. The defense, too.

You actually said who decides if he can be convicted based on the argument. And yes, that is now up to the jury. Not the judge.
No he hasn't, moron. He hasn't ruled on the issue yet.
 

Forum List

Back
Top