JUDGE: Those Allegedly Shot By Rittenhouse Can’t Be Called ‘Victims’ During Trial, ‘Rioters’ And ‘Arsonists’ Both More Accurate

[theHawk]

It does appear to be going Kyle's way at the moment...not the prosecutor's.

No need to crucify the kid...

The jury is likely rigged with BLM homos, like the Chauvin show trial.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

What else do you call people that were shot by a guy but victims?

What do you call a person beaten senseless by a mob? That's what would have happened had Rittenhouse not been armed and he would be the victim instead.

You people keep overlooking one glaring fact: Rittenhouse did not initiate this confrontation. He was chased and then attacked and so he defended himself.

 

[theHawk]

He had no business being there armed and violating curfew

Funny how that doesn’t apply to the violent rioters and those that attacked Rittenhouse.

 

[theHawk]

You people keep overlooking one glaring fact: Rittenhouse did not initiate this confrontation. He was chased and then attacked and so he defended himself

Don’t you know? White people being chased by an angry mob are supposed to get let themselves be executed.

If this was a black man defending himself against all white attackers the left would be singing a different tune.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I never said I would do that

You didn't have to say it explicitly. Your assumption that all 12 people on the jury would do it shows us that you would do it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What did we do before video? We investigated and we took witness statements. Video is nice to have but it's not required

Yep. And the prosecution will be parading out witnesses that will describe Rittenhouse's bad behavior earlier in the evening.

, I don't know if his presence was an illegal act

Out after curfew. The police were arresting people for it that night.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That doesn't mean the judge is going to buy it as a reason for convicting Rittenhouse of murder

That's up to the jury. Man, you really have a hard time following simple ideas and discussions.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Funny how that doesn’t apply to the violent rioters and those that attacked Rittenhouse.

It does apply to them. But that doesn't excuse any of them, including Rittenhouse.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

jury is likely rigged with BLM homos, like the Chauvin show trial.

And the cultist lines up his preemptive excuses...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Yep. And the prosecution will be parading out witnesses that will describe Rittenhouse's bad behavior earlier in the evening.


Out after curfew. The police were arresting people for it that night.

The defense will be allowed to show a video in which a police officer gives Rittenhouse a bottle of water and thanked him.

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2021-10-24/hearing-may-settle-use-of-force-experts-at-rittenhouse-trial

This is the last day of pre trial motions. Trial is expected to last two weeks. So far, it isn't looking good for the case the prosecution is trying to make.

 

[M14 Shooter]

What else do you call people that were shot by a guy but victims?

In this case?
Threats
Perpetrators

 

[bripat9643]

Yep. And the prosecution will be parading out witnesses that will describe Rittenhouse's bad behavior earlier in the evening.


Out after curfew. The police were arresting people for it that night.

So that means Rittenhouse has to let thugs kill him?

 

[bripat9643]

It does apply to them. But that doesn't excuse any of them, including Rittenhouse.

But you want to convict him of murder for it, and let the thugs off scot free?

You just can't see what a fucking NAZI you are.

 

[bripat9643]

It does apply to them. But that doesn't excuse any of them, including Rittenhouse.

Meaningless bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

That's up to the jury. Man, you really have a hard time following simple ideas and discussions.

No, it's not up to a jury. It's up to the judge if he's going to allow that line or argument.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So that means Rittenhouse has to let thugs kill him?

No, it means he should not have been there in the first place. For starters.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's up to the judge if he's going to allow that line or argument.

And the judge has already done so, in not dismissing the charges and in letting the trial proceed. The judge is already aware of exactly what the prosecution will argue. The defense, too.

You actually said who decides if he can be convicted based on the argument. And yes, that is now up to the jury. Not the judge.

 

[Crepitus]

At one point, the judge rebuked Binger for nonchalantly referring to acts of arson. “All we’re talking about is arson, we’re talking about being loud and disorderly,” Binger said of Rosenbaum’s conduct on the night of the rioting.

“I can’t believe some of the things you’re saying,” the judge interjected. “All we’re talking about is arson? Come on.”

JUDGE: Those Allegedly Shot By Rittenhouse Can't Be Called 'Victims' During Trial, 'Rioters' And 'Arsonists' Both More Accurate

Wisconsin Judge Bruce Schroeder laid out the final ground rules on evidence for the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in a pretrial hearing on Monday. Schroeder ruled on several motions from both the prosecution and defense relating to terminology, evidence and use of force experts. The prosecution had...

nationalfile.com

Obviously prejudiced. Time to recuse. And even if he doesn't he just guaranteed a retrial because either side can use that as grounds to void the verdict.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Obviously prejudiced. Time to recuse. And even if he doesn't he just guaranteed a retrial because either side can use that as grounds to void the verdict.

Doubtful. I think the judge is speaking to the idea that arson is a serious crime. he didn't appreciate the State saying "it's ONLY arson, geesh".

 

[JohnDB]

The jury is likely rigged with BLM homos, like the Chauvin show trial.

I don't think so... Kyle had over 2mil in his war chest to put up a defense...part of that money can easily go towards a jury selection firm that will get him the best possible jury. The State will not be able to do as well. Chauvin had "union" representation...one that was oversold and underdelivered. Of course the policeman's union is politically opposed to his innocence. The fix was in for that one before the moment the video hit the news. He was just the scapegoat.
I seen ALL the video of the arrest. Not just the famous 20 second clip. There's no way he should have been convicted either...but the damage is done... maybe later when things cool down he can get a retrial and win on a technicality.
Claiming lawyer incompetence might work.