The Sage of Main Street
Gold Member
FAGA's Version of The Art of the DealWhere did she pull the 21 Days from?
Blackrobe playing blackjack.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FAGA's Version of The Art of the DealWhere did she pull the 21 Days from?
The Wall Is a Maginot LineMost of them have already been in custody for at least 21 days. I'd argue that is notice.
LOL, You've been talking to my wife, haven't you?The Wall Is a Maginot Line
Only the border needs a notice: TRESPASSERS WILL BE SHOT.
To expect 700 immigration judges to handle more than 20 million cases, it would take them more than 70 years with each handling 1 case a day, seven days a week which of course they never work seven days a week or 365 days per year. That simply is not reasonable in light of a major migrant invasion of our country even when the government illegally and maliciously facilitated that. Even if they handled three cases a day which would be a stretch given all the legal maneuvering and technicalities, we are still looking at more than 20 years to send all the illegals home.I’m not a fan of the SCOTUS making up shit on the fly, either.
By even if (for practical reasons) some “due process” is demanded, even the SCOTUS didn’t say 21 days.
If a “reasonable” amounts nt of time is required (which would any a matter I have major qualms about), it still isn’t up to SCOTUS to legislate that amount of time.
A time American democrats.Ironically, those judges were appointed by other elected officials.
No.To expect 700 immigration judges to handle more than 20 million cases, it would take them more than 70 years with each handling 1 case a day, seven days a week which of course they never work seven days a week or 365 days per year. That simply is not reasonable in light of a major migrant invasion of our country even when the government illegally and maliciously facilitated that. Even if they handled three cases a day which would be a stretch given all the legal maneuvering and technicalities, we are still looking at more than 20 years to send all the illegals home.
That is what the Biden administration has forced onto us. We need a remedy more effective and efficient than what the Democrat controlled courts want to allow.
It will still take decades to eject all the illegals at the rate we are going.No.
Immigration “courts” have numerous cases on their dockets every day. A removal proceeding hearing could take place in one session although frequently the “court” will grant a continuance or more than one continuance.
Plus, if we focus first on the illegal aliens who have proceeded to commit additional crimes once here, we can swiftly get them kicked out. Then we can turn to the less urgent cases.
How does one eat an elephant?It will still take decades to eject all the illegals at the rate we are going.
First you have to know how to clean it, prepare it, season it, cook it.How does one eat an elephant?
First you have to know how to clean it, prepare it, season it, cook it.
I say give our silly immigration “court” system some appropriate time and maybe a lot more resources.All I am saying is that with the current mentality of the Democrats and their surrogate courts, we will never be able to solve the problem. We can't fix a bad system by changing the people. And we can't fix bad people by changing the system. We need a good system and good people running it.
It has had four years to send migrants home and for the most part has mostly not done so. And the courts are doing everything they can to prevent President Trump and his team from deporting anybody. The critics cite the large number of migrants deported under Biden. But do not cite the enormous number--millions and millions--of migrants Biden invited, facilitated, allowed into the country.Nah. The right answer is always: one small bite at a time.
I say give our silly immigration “court” system some appropriate time and maybe a lot more resources.
Obama deported more than Trump yet, not a peep out of these hypocritical Democrats.Isn't it odd how Dimocrats didn't want to challenge Clinton or Obama when they deported MILLIONS of illegals.
It has had four years to send migrants home and for the most part has mostly not done so.
It's so stupid to say to illegals, we give you a 21 notice you will be deported and then you can't deport them because they have flown the coup.See: Trump must give some Venezuelan migrants 21 days’ notice before deportations, judge rules 1
April 22, 2025
The fact is, under Section 2 of the Alien Enemies Act, those charged by “complaint” are entitled to the process outlined within Section 2.
What Judge Sweeney suspiciously avoids to note in her written opinion is, under Section 1 of the Enemies Alien Act, the President is delegated an extraordinary power totally separate from aliens charged by “complaint” under Section 2, and it includes an unobstructed discretionary deportation power to classify, apprehend, restrain, secure and remove, aliens deemed, as stated in the President’s Proclamation, to pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.
With respect to Section 1’s extraordinary power, the only process which may be due an alien when secured for deportation is a writ of habeas corpus, and it would be limited to determining whether or not the subject in question is in fact an alien and not a citizen of the United States.
JWK
”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [a United States District Judge] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47
That's who the courts are gunning for. Him instead of the illegals.There’s a new sheriff in town.![]()
This is why we need to rein in our judiciary.That's who the courts are gunning for. Him instead of the illegals.
Which was the point I was making here.This is why we need to rein in our judiciary.
Checks and balances are all well and good. I like it. But it’s not supposed to be one-sided.
But if it’s not supposed to be one-sided, then maybe it is time to take a massive shit on judicial activists.Which was the point I was making here.