Judge halting dismantling of USAID says there's no support for Musk/Trump's claim of massive "corruption and fraud"

There is some waste in USAID, no doubt, but fraud is a different issue. Trump’s attack on USAID is based on lies. The WSJ just published a story that many Repubs are in a state of panic as they don’t want the agency shuttered. They acknowledge that USAID does a lot of good.

the truth is coming out commie .. the lefts attempted bankrupting of the country in order to destroy it so they can create their Marxist utopian homosexual dream is being revealed for all to see .. the Dems aren't gonna win the hearts and minds of the American voters by not allowing oversight and accountability on their tax dollars being wasted ..
 
and they may have just lost the mid term and the 2028 election because of their resistance to transparency !
/----/ democRATs are stuck on stupid and are doubling down on their TDS. Hopfully this will carry through to the 2026 midterms.
1739359501193.webp
 
There is some waste in USAID, no doubt, but fraud is a different issue. Trump’s attack on USAID is based on lies. The WSJ just published a story that many Repubs are in a state of panic as they don’t want the agency shuttered. They acknowledge that USAID does a lot of good.

 
There is some waste in USAID, no doubt, but fraud is a different issue. Trump’s attack on USAID is based on lies. The WSJ just published a story that many Repubs are in a state of panic as they don’t want the agency shuttered. They acknowledge that USAID does a lot of good.

/---/ I wonder if the WSJ got $$$ from USAID.
 
The enablers of the rot which is USAID are getting the boot.


/----/ Good. Now democRATs will scramble to find another activist job to interfere with the executive branch.
1739361462577.webp
 
Now democRATs will scramble to find another activist job to interfere with the executive branch.
Boy, the Constitutionalists really come out of the shadows now. So much for the House of Representatives, eh?
 
The WSJ just published a story that many Repubs are in a state of panic as they don’t want the agency shuttered. They acknowledge that USAID does a lot of good.
The good part isn't the concern. It will continue.
Did you not read the part where the judge said there is no evidence of the fraud they are alleging?
That's what the Democrats lawyers told him most likely.

Your honor, we've seen no evidence of fraud.
 
Seeing some of the posts on this subject makes it easy to see who is a paid hack for the dems. Musk shows 20 pages of abuse of taxpayer money, Crepitus what fraud Clayton Jones aka IM2, what fraud?
 
Most on the left haven't realized that sooner or later people on the right will go down from the investigation.

Greed doesn't discriminate.

Note the 'patriotic' bipartisan pilgrimages to Ukraine Mecca......very telling.

I'm sure the Pentagon will be Kickback City.
 
Last edited:
Most on the left haven't realized that sooner or later people on the right will go down from the investigation.

Greed doesn't discriminate.

Note the 'patriotic' bipartisan pilgrimages to Ukraine Mecca......very telling.

I'm sure the Pentagon will be Kickback City.
/---/ I never thought for a second that Republicans in Congress were completely innocent. The temptation is too great. Jail anyone taking $$$ on the side.
 
It looks like the “Apple” (USAID) was mostly worms on the inside… so instead of trying to salvage such a nasty apple, you throw it out and start over or use different fruit.

Democrats are pretending that if USAID is done then there’s no possible way that anyone in the USA can ever help Another nation or person ever again, forever.

This is a very dumb, simpleminded thing to suggest, but boy are they gung-ho about it.
 
This is a very dumb, simpleminded thing to suggest, but boy are they gung-ho about it.
I think we'll see lot's of allocated monies destined for certain benevolent causes, ending up where it was supposed to except in a much smaller amount than was supposed to, with the rest going to all kinds of other, unintended destinations that, if mentioned up front, never would have been granted.
 
I think we'll see lot's of allocated monies destined for certain benevolent causes, ending up where it was supposed to except in a much smaller amount than was supposed to, with the rest going to all kinds of other, unintended destinations that, if mentioned up front, never would have been granted.
Indeed… mostly radical leftist, globalist, trans causes.

The thing is, they know it’s a losing cause, which is why they want to deny it’s happening instead of proudly declare it, although that happens eventually… it’s always this sequence:

1. “That’s not happening!”
2. “It’s only happening a little bit!”
3. “It should happen and you’re a bigot to suggest otherwise”

Every time
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom