Judge halting dismantling of USAID says there's no support for Musk/Trump's claim of massive "corruption and fraud"

These anti-American, corrupt, political pawns need to be arrested, charge with treason and locked up. A clear message needs to be sent.
They are willfully endangering American lives and stealing from taxpayers.

Stop playing the good guy game with these treacherous traitors already and get serious.
 
Last edited:
LMAO!! A Faux Noize link?

What do you think that "debunks"?
LMAO!! You can’t refute the facts so you’re left to beg and plead for attention.

Such a sad little lady.
 
Further debunking at this link.

actually the gutting of USAID makes it more likely that funds might end up in terrorist hands.

middle east form is a far right questionable source, so take what they say with a grain of salt.
 
actually the gutting of USAID makes it more likely that funds might end up in terrorist hands.

middle east form is a far right questionable source, so take what they say with a grain of salt.
Similarly, as a far left loon, it’s important to take your rants with five pounds of salt.

USAID was the pipeline used by democrats to fund their terrorist heroes.
 
Nichols noted that despite Trump’s claim of massive “corruption and fraud” in the agency, government lawyers had no support for that argument in court. Aside from that assertion, the judge said, the administration was unable to explain “what harm would befall the government if it could not immediately place on administrative leave the more than 2000 employees in question.”


An attorney for the Trump administration — acting Justice Department Civil Division head Brett Shumate — had urged Nichols to refrain from intervening in the matter on an emergency basis, saying the issue amounted to an employment dispute that could be resolved through other grievance processes. He noted that the 2,200 employees being placed on leave would still be paid and could challenge any actions they felt were improper.
But Nichols rejected that argument. “Administrative leave in Syria is not the same as administrative leave in Bethesda: simply being paid cannot change that fact.”

The judge says the administration lawyers brough no evidence of corruption.

When have we heard of trump lawyers making absurd claims they don't have evidence of before?

Seems like a habit for them.

Of course when they lose, they will blame the judge, not their lack of evidence.


USAID did not give millions of taxpayer dollars to Politico. The spending came from agencies across the federal government for subscriptions to Politico Pro, according to USA Spending, the database that tracks government grants and contracts.

The spokesperson acknowledges the figure is bunk.

Turning Point USA Spokesperson Andrew Kolvet said Kirk was referring to the top-line figure of $8 million in taxpayer dollars going to Politico. Kolvet acknowledged the amount coming from USAID was smaller, but he questioned its necessity.

USAID did not fund a musical in Ireland, the state department did. And it wasn't a musical.

Speaking with reporters Feb. 3, Leavitt said USAID gave a grant for "production of a DEI musical in Ireland." That grant came from the State Department, not USAID.

The grant funded a 2022 music festival (not a musical) in 2022 at the U.S. Embassy in Ireland, according to Irish news site Gript. The event featured performances from Irish musicians.


Further debunking at this link

Who elected the judge to determine what is wasteful spending in the government?
 
They both submitted testimony in legal briefs. Just because it wasn't verbal doesn't mean nobody testified.
/—-/ I found it. The ruling was handed down in the middle of the night. No White House lawyer was present. It’s called an ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present.
Fast forward to 2:40
 
Nichols noted that despite Trump’s claim of massive “corruption and fraud” in the agency, government lawyers had no support for that argument in court. Aside from that assertion, the judge said, the administration was unable to explain “what harm would befall the government if it could not immediately place on administrative leave the more than 2000 employees in question.”


An attorney for the Trump administration — acting Justice Department Civil Division head Brett Shumate — had urged Nichols to refrain from intervening in the matter on an emergency basis, saying the issue amounted to an employment dispute that could be resolved through other grievance processes. He noted that the 2,200 employees being placed on leave would still be paid and could challenge any actions they felt were improper.
But Nichols rejected that argument. “Administrative leave in Syria is not the same as administrative leave in Bethesda: simply being paid cannot change that fact.”

The judge says the administration lawyers brough no evidence of corruption.

When have we heard of trump lawyers making absurd claims they don't have evidence of before?

Seems like a habit for them.

Of course when they lose, they will blame the judge, not their lack of evidence.


USAID did not give millions of taxpayer dollars to Politico. The spending came from agencies across the federal government for subscriptions to Politico Pro, according to USA Spending, the database that tracks government grants and contracts.

The spokesperson acknowledges the figure is bunk.

Turning Point USA Spokesperson Andrew Kolvet said Kirk was referring to the top-line figure of $8 million in taxpayer dollars going to Politico. Kolvet acknowledged the amount coming from USAID was smaller, but he questioned its necessity.

USAID did not fund a musical in Ireland, the state department did. And it wasn't a musical.

Speaking with reporters Feb. 3, Leavitt said USAID gave a grant for "production of a DEI musical in Ireland." That grant came from the State Department, not USAID.

The grant funded a 2022 music festival (not a musical) in 2022 at the U.S. Embassy in Ireland, according to Irish news site Gript. The event featured performances from Irish musicians.


Further debunking at this link

And this judge knows that, how?...lol
 
Nichols noted that despite Trump’s claim of massive “corruption and fraud” in the agency, government lawyers had no support for that argument in court. Aside from that assertion, the judge said, the administration was unable to explain “what harm would befall the government if it could not immediately place on administrative leave the more than 2000 employees in question.”


An attorney for the Trump administration — acting Justice Department Civil Division head Brett Shumate — had urged Nichols to refrain from intervening in the matter on an emergency basis, saying the issue amounted to an employment dispute that could be resolved through other grievance processes. He noted that the 2,200 employees being placed on leave would still be paid and could challenge any actions they felt were improper.
But Nichols rejected that argument. “Administrative leave in Syria is not the same as administrative leave in Bethesda: simply being paid cannot change that fact.”

The judge says the administration lawyers brough no evidence of corruption.

When have we heard of trump lawyers making absurd claims they don't have evidence of before?

Seems like a habit for them.

Of course when they lose, they will blame the judge, not their lack of evidence.


USAID did not give millions of taxpayer dollars to Politico. The spending came from agencies across the federal government for subscriptions to Politico Pro, according to USA Spending, the database that tracks government grants and contracts.

The spokesperson acknowledges the figure is bunk.

Turning Point USA Spokesperson Andrew Kolvet said Kirk was referring to the top-line figure of $8 million in taxpayer dollars going to Politico. Kolvet acknowledged the amount coming from USAID was smaller, but he questioned its necessity.

USAID did not fund a musical in Ireland, the state department did. And it wasn't a musical.

Speaking with reporters Feb. 3, Leavitt said USAID gave a grant for "production of a DEI musical in Ireland." That grant came from the State Department, not USAID.

The grant funded a 2022 music festival (not a musical) in 2022 at the U.S. Embassy in Ireland, according to Irish news site Gript. The event featured performances from Irish musicians.


Further debunking at this link

Why are ANY government agencies spending money on politico?
 
/—-/ I found it. The ruling was handed down in the middle of the night. No White House lawyer was present. It’s called an ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present.
Fast forward to 2:40

I said submitted in writing.

I don't know what you think this proves.
 
LMAO!! A Faux Noize link?

What do you think that "debunks"?
Isn't that the media outlet that told us time after time that Biden wasn't playing with a full deck and your trusted sources vehemently denied and covered for him, then after the debate they admitted lying to the public about it?
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

Can't trust Fox.....
 
Why are ANY government agencies spending money on politico?
The response will be 'it was for subscriptions'......so 8.2 Mil for subscriptions', and they'll go after Biden like they do Trump?
 
The response will be 'it was for subscriptions'......so 8.2 Mil for subscriptions', and they'll go after Biden like they do Trump?

Yeah, i know...why is ANY taxpayer money buying subscriptions to politico...or any news agency for that matter.


I mean crap, I wonder if I can find a way for uncle Sam to pay for my Amazon prime..... 🤔
 
The Democrats are claiming we are in a constipational crisis.......

Oh shit.


.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom