Judge halting dismantling of USAID says there's no support for Musk/Trump's claim of massive "corruption and fraud"

This article can name the Trump attorney to this extent but not name the judge?

The way the article is written...it's not even clear if "Nichols" is the Judge or the opposing attorney. What is the judges first name?

Why would they be afraid to name the judge in the same manor the named the Trump attorney?
Click the link.
 
There's a process to go through here. This will give it time to work.
Breaking today... Musk was told to keep digging despite the judge's order... kind of like Biden did over and over again...
 
1000008733.webp
 
DC is full of auditors... and look what has been done with our money... did you know that USAID gave a cement company in Palestine 300 million dollars and Hamas used the cement to build tunnels?... come on man... no auditor exposed that or tranny shows in Africa at tune of 1.2 million dollars...
 
That's imaginary. Did you not read the part where the judge said there is no evidence of the fraud they are alleging?
/—-/ How the hell does a judge in NY know what has been uncovered in Washington? Unless, he’s in on the scam and is protecting the other crooks.
 
Nichols noted that despite Trump’s claim of massive “corruption and fraud” in the agency, government lawyers had no support for that argument in court. Aside from that assertion, the judge said, the administration was unable to explain “what harm would befall the government if it could not immediately place on administrative leave the more than 2000 employees in question.”


An attorney for the Trump administration — acting Justice Department Civil Division head Brett Shumate — had urged Nichols to refrain from intervening in the matter on an emergency basis, saying the issue amounted to an employment dispute that could be resolved through other grievance processes. He noted that the 2,200 employees being placed on leave would still be paid and could challenge any actions they felt were improper.
But Nichols rejected that argument. “Administrative leave in Syria is not the same as administrative leave in Bethesda: simply being paid cannot change that fact.”

The judge says the administration lawyers brough no evidence of corruption.

When have we heard of trump lawyers making absurd claims they don't have evidence of before?

Seems like a habit for them.

Of course when they lose, they will blame the judge, not their lack of evidence.


USAID did not give millions of taxpayer dollars to Politico. The spending came from agencies across the federal government for subscriptions to Politico Pro, according to USA Spending, the database that tracks government grants and contracts.

The spokesperson acknowledges the figure is bunk.

Turning Point USA Spokesperson Andrew Kolvet said Kirk was referring to the top-line figure of $8 million in taxpayer dollars going to Politico. Kolvet acknowledged the amount coming from USAID was smaller, but he questioned its necessity.

USAID did not fund a musical in Ireland, the state department did. And it wasn't a musical.

Speaking with reporters Feb. 3, Leavitt said USAID gave a grant for "production of a DEI musical in Ireland." That grant came from the State Department, not USAID.

The grant funded a 2022 music festival (not a musical) in 2022 at the U.S. Embassy in Ireland, according to Irish news site Gript. The event featured performances from Irish musicians.


Further debunking at this link

So does anyone know whether Trump/Elon/et al minions are referring to what they're doing as an investigation, audit, forensic accounting examination?!? Anything like that?
 
Nichols noted that despite Trump’s claim of massive “corruption and fraud” in the agency, government lawyers had no support for that argument in court. Aside from that assertion, the judge said, the administration was unable to explain “what harm would befall the government if it could not immediately place on administrative leave the more than 2000 employees in question.”


An attorney for the Trump administration — acting Justice Department Civil Division head Brett Shumate — had urged Nichols to refrain from intervening in the matter on an emergency basis, saying the issue amounted to an employment dispute that could be resolved through other grievance processes. He noted that the 2,200 employees being placed on leave would still be paid and could challenge any actions they felt were improper.
But Nichols rejected that argument. “Administrative leave in Syria is not the same as administrative leave in Bethesda: simply being paid cannot change that fact.”

The judge says the administration lawyers brough no evidence of corruption.

When have we heard of trump lawyers making absurd claims they don't have evidence of before?

Seems like a habit for them.

Of course when they lose, they will blame the judge, not their lack of evidence.


USAID did not give millions of taxpayer dollars to Politico. The spending came from agencies across the federal government for subscriptions to Politico Pro, according to USA Spending, the database that tracks government grants and contracts.

The spokesperson acknowledges the figure is bunk.

Turning Point USA Spokesperson Andrew Kolvet said Kirk was referring to the top-line figure of $8 million in taxpayer dollars going to Politico. Kolvet acknowledged the amount coming from USAID was smaller, but he questioned its necessity.

USAID did not fund a musical in Ireland, the state department did. And it wasn't a musical.

Speaking with reporters Feb. 3, Leavitt said USAID gave a grant for "production of a DEI musical in Ireland." That grant came from the State Department, not USAID.

The grant funded a 2022 music festival (not a musical) in 2022 at the U.S. Embassy in Ireland, according to Irish news site Gript. The event featured performances from Irish musicians.


Further debunking at this link

You’re brain dead…
 
Back
Top Bottom