Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I guess you guys drew a f*ed up hand then didn’t you? She’s going to ram this down your throats, and there is little to nothing you can do about it…I guess Smith will get another loss notch in his worthless career belt….lol
Yes, really. The NYC judgement against Trump is an absolute atrocity and COMPLETELY political. Just because other liberal judges don't oppose it, doesn't make it any less so.Not really. Cannon is the only judge we see talking about that had to be reversed upon appeal. Epically too.
What is Smith appealing??There are no jury instructions at this juncture. Moot point. She should be tossed, and probably will be, or commanded to get the law right.
Trump lied to the bank. We all know that’s wrong. You wouldnt have done that, but you defend Trump doing it purely for political reasons.Yes, really. The NYC judgement against Trump is an absolute atrocity and COMPLETELY political. Just because other liberal judges don't oppose it, doesn't make it any less so.
Most of you on the right probably haven't figured this out, judging from some of your comments which clearly indicate you do not understand the forces that are in play, i.e.,, what the actual dynamics are, (it's way in Smith's favor, FYI) because they right wing echo chamber isn't telling you, but Judge Cannon fucked up on the law, royally. Jack will file a motion in limine, and if she ignores it, he'll have grounds for a petition for writ of mandamus, and he'll either get the 11th circuit to straighten her out on the law (which she has turned on it's head), or get her ass off the case. She's bitten off far more than she can chew.
Let's see if I'm right. We'll know in a day or two. One thing is certain, Jack's not going to let the last 2 page order where she wrote 'unprecedented and unjust', he's not going to let that slide.
This is really an interesting case, particularly because we have an extremely wet behind the ears judge handling a case who is in way way way over her head. But, that's the system, whoever is next on the rotation, regardless of experience matching, is the one assigned, and she got it. Clearly, the system is ripe for reform.
Did you feel that way when Trump looses a case? I’d bet not.just the way the founders planned it. powerful interests can ram injustice down our throats.
we do not seek such injustice, a fair chance to restore a few vital checks and balances.
is it fair to ask WHY you want to give such unchecked power to any human?
Is that the new talking point?How so? If smith files a motion for in limine, and she doesn't give the right answer, he'll file a writ of mandamus, to get the 11th circuit (who have twice ruled against her) to tell her to get the law right, or have her removed, it's one or the other.
He has the upper hand. She fell right into his trap.
So then why haven't they pursued many others under the same statute?Trump lied to the bank. We all know that’s wrong. You wouldnt have done that, but you defend Trump doing it purely for political reasons.
Who exactly?So then why haven't they pursued many others under the same statute?
The state of NY. When is Laticia going to go after another business or individual. They could raise billions.Who exactly?
Who should they go after?The state of NY. When is Laticia going to go after another business or individual. They could raise billions.
Here is a little hint...they won't because it is HUGE trap which would ensare far too many people.
Most of you on the right probably haven't figured this out, judging from some of your comments which clearly indicate you do not understand the forces that are in play, i.e.,, what the actual dynamics are, (it's way in Smith's favor, FYI) because they right wing echo chamber isn't telling you, but Judge Cannon fucked up on the law, royally. Jack will file a motion in limine, and if she ignores it, he'll have grounds for a petition for writ of mandamus, and he'll either get the 11th circuit to straighten her out on the law (which she has turned on it's head), or get her ass off the case. She's bitten off far more than she can chew.
Let's see if I'm right. We'll know in a day or two. One thing is certain, Jack's not going to let the last 2 page order where she wrote 'unprecedented and unjust', he's not going to let that slide.
This is really an interesting case, particularly because we have an extremely wet behind the ears judge handling a case who is in way way way over her head. But, that's the system, whoever is next on the rotation, regardless of experience matching, is the one assigned, and she got it. Clearly, the system is ripe for reform.
You have a link to that two page order? I'd like to see how right you and Jack Smith are.
The charge is an espionage violation and this is a criminal procedure, which takes precedence over civil statutes. PRA is therefore irrelevant.Are you telling us, as Smith apparently is, that President Trump was NOT subject to the Presidential Records Act?
