Judge Cannon has blown it.

[Billo_Really]

Liar. That's an OPINION piece.

There are no facts.

Clearly you don't know the difference.

Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!

 

[jc456]

By her rulings like asking for jury instructions before the trial has even began.

Explain your point

 

[jc456]

Eileen Cannon is awful and unethical.

Legal experts: Judge Cannon could face removal for “disturbing” order

"Compromising national security is a bridge too far,” says longtime Harvard legal scholar Laurence Tribe.

www.salon.com

Not sure what this means?

 

[jc456]

Her rulings.

Like?

 

[jc456]

Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!

Who’s she asking?

 

[westwall]

Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!

So tell Smith to stop it, dumbass!

 

[Billo_Really]

Explain your point

Why ask for jury instructions when there is no jury? Do the math, mother-fucker!

 

[Billo_Really]

Not sure what this means?

Read the fucking article you lazy piece of shit!

 

[Billo_Really]

Like?

I just answered that a couple posts ago, troll boy. Go back and read it.

 

[Billo_Really]

Who’s she asking?

If you are not well versed on this issue, you should not be posting, you fucking troll!

 

[Billo_Really]

So tell Smith to stop it, dumbass!

Stop what, fuckhead?

 

[jc456]

If you are not well versed on this issue, you should not be posting, you fucking troll!

So you can’t tell us?

 

[westwall]

Stop what, fuckhead?

Try reading it YOURSELF!

Dumbass!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!

She is trying to funnel the trial toward two outcomes.

Either a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever, or a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever.

Okay, one outcome.

 

[Billo_Really]

So you can’t tell us?

I already did, fuckhead!

 

[jc456]

I already did, fuckhead!

What is with you demofks to get tied up as pretzels all the time. Forgive me, but what post # was it?

 

[Billo_Really]

Try reading it YOURSELF!

Dumbass!

She is trying to funnel the trial toward two outcomes.

Either a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever, or a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever.

Okay, one outcome.

There is no reason a former President should keep nuclear secrets

 

[jc456]

She is trying to funnel the trial toward two outcomes.

Either a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever, or a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever.

Okay, one outcome.

John Fitzpatrick the expert says exactly that. Who has more knowledge than an expert?

 

[Billo_Really]

What is with you demofks to get tied up as pretzels all the time. Forgive me, but what post # was it?

265.

 

[jc456]

There is no reason a former President should keep nuclear secrets

How do you know he had those?