Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Judge Cannon has blown it.
- Thread starter Rumpole
- Start date
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
Explain your pointBy her rulings like asking for jury instructions before the trial has even began.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
Not sure what this means?Eileen Cannon is awful and unethical.
Legal experts: Judge Cannon could face removal for âdisturbingâ order
"Compromising national security is a bridge too far,” says longtime Harvard legal scholar Laurence Tribe.www.salon.com
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
Like?Her rulings.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
Who’s she asking?Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!
So tell Smith to stop it, dumbass!Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!
Why ask for jury instructions when there is no jury? Do the math, mother-fucker!Explain your point
Read the fucking article you lazy piece of shit!Not sure what this means?
I just answered that a couple posts ago, troll boy. Go back and read it.Like?
If you are not well versed on this issue, you should not be posting, you fucking troll!Who’s she asking?
Stop what, fuckhead?So tell Smith to stop it, dumbass!
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
So you can’t tell us?If you are not well versed on this issue, you should not be posting, you fucking troll!
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 94,443
- 65,928
- 2,645
She is trying to funnel the trial toward two outcomes.Asking for jury instructions before a trial has even begun, is fucking nuts!
Either a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever, or a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever.
Okay, one outcome.
I already did, fuckhead!So you can’t tell us?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
What is with you demofks to get tied up as pretzels all the time. Forgive me, but what post # was it?I already did, fuckhead!
Try reading it YOURSELF!
Dumbass!
There is no reason a former President should keep nuclear secretsShe is trying to funnel the trial toward two outcomes.
Either a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever, or a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever.
Okay, one outcome.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
John Fitzpatrick the expert says exactly that. Who has more knowledge than an expert?She is trying to funnel the trial toward two outcomes.
Either a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever, or a president can take and keep anything he likes, forever.
Okay, one outcome.
265.What is with you demofks to get tied up as pretzels all the time. Forgive me, but what post # was it?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,427
- 28,331
- 2,180
How do you know he had those?There is no reason a former President should keep nuclear secrets
Similar threads
- Replies
- 192
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 99
- Replies
- 122
- Views
- 845
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 9K
- Views
- 59K
- Replies
- 77
- Views
- 329
- Replies
- 84
- Views
- 619
- Replies
- 91
- Views
- 416
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8217
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 475
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-