Judge Blocks US Government From Slimming Down Vaccine Recommendations

This is the latest, but not the best example of how Leftists in this country use compromised jurists (i.e. judges) to fight policies and government actions that they don't like regardless of law, the Constitution, logic or reality.

A Federal Department Secretary has, in effect, reduced the number of inoculations that his Department recommends for general public guidance. It prevents NO ONE from getting a shot, nor does it make it any more difficult, should the parents want to get more than the recommended minimum.

The very notion that ANY court can stand in the way of this administrative action is outrageous.

A pox on all their houses.
Our legal system has been infiltrated by Marxists. We even have a female SCOTUS who can't define what a woman is.
 
Last edited:
A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked federal health officials from cutting the number of vaccines recommended for every child, and said U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. likely violated federal procedures in revamping a key vaccine advisory committee.

he decision halted an order by Kennedy — announced in January — to end broad recommendations for all children to be vaccinated against flu, rotavirus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, some forms of meningitis and RSV.

It also stopped a meeting of a Kennedy-appointed vaccine advisory committee, which was set to convene this week in Atlanta.

Kennedy used junk science and disputed reports. He is playing games with the lives of children and he wrong to so.
Yep....
He is not using actual scientific data....
And after he promised to do just that.

However,
The recommendations in favor of vaccines are not based on real science either.

Vaccines are an imported product. And testing large pallets of vials has become routine to the point that the suppliers know exactly which boxes will be tested.

Adjuvants have never been tested for side effects.

So....
We need a whole bunch of mundane research accomplished instead of the "assumptions" we have been relying upon.

We need actual reproduced scientific studies....because researchers have been lying and independent reporting agencies have not been independent. So....we need to go back and reprove some "accepted" results.

So where I understand the desire for using axes and chainsaws instead of scalpels.....because at this point it's safer to do nothing instead of continuing what we have been doing.
 
That's a ridiculous lie, and everyone can stop reading right there.
Unfortunately it's true.

Do you know what a real double blind study is?
How long term research actually works?

How about a good old fashioned SAE file?

How independent 3rd party reporting works in reality?


Or how there really has been very little vaccine side effect research...especially since they have made massive changes to how vaccines are produced.
 
A guy whose brain has been eaten by worms and openly talks about snorting cocaine off of toilet seats shouldn't be recommending anything about vaccines
Agreed so why is the judge making him when doesn’t want to?
 
just as soon as you show us a real science-based study of vaccines that showed positive effects.
Sure, I'll run right out and do that for you. You just take RFK's advice and put this plastic bag over your head and wait here until I get back.
 
Sure, I'll run right out and do that for you. You just take RFK's advice and put this plastic bag over your head and wait here until I get back.
Come up with something other than messages of hate and vitriol that inspire zero trust in anything you say.

Look, over the decades I've watched the US FDA go cyclical from zombies to nazis...back and forth several times.

One admin would be Nazi and the next would be asleep at the wheel. You never really knew until they were in office. Bush's was asleep but Clinton's were Nazis for food but both just the opposite for drugs.

It's been an insane mix for the past 50 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom