Judge blocks prosecutors’ access to James Comey’s lawyer’s emails and data

DonGlock26

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
16,498
Reaction score
24,241
Points
2,288
"Judge blocks prosecutors’ access to James Comey’s lawyer’s emails and data


Court says government’s retention and use of law professor Daniel Richman’s data appears to have been illegal.





A federal judge dealt a setback Saturday to the Justice Department’s effort to re-indict former FBI Director James Comey, blocking prosecutors’ access to key evidence from email accounts and a computer belonging to close Comey friend and attorney Daniel Richman.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly granted a temporary restraining order sought by Richman’s lawyers, requiring that the evidence be sequestered pending a ruling on Richman’s claim that the government illegally retained his emails and other data.

“The Court concludes that Petitioner Richman is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that the Government has violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures by retaining a complete copy of all files on his personal computer (an ‘image’ of the computer) and searching that image without a warrant,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote in a four-page order filed Saturday, one day after Richman’s attorneys requested the emergency order.

Kollar-Kotelly, a Clinton appointee based in Washington, issued the restraining order before getting a formal response from prosecutors to a petition Richman filed last week seeking return of his data. However, she said a lack of clear indication about who currently has the data and where it is stored supported her conclusion that a temporary order limiting access to the trove of records was warranted.


A copy of the law professor’s personal computer, iCloud account and Columbia University email accounts were obtained by the Justice Department in 2017, following Trump’s firing of Comey as FBI director. Richman allowed investigators to make an image of his computer during an investigation into an alleged disclosure of classified information. The FBI later obtained other records through search warrants."




More resistance from the federal bench. He gave the evidence to the FBI in 2017. Now a judge wants to block its use. :laughing0301:
 
need a merge, I was first...

 
The Judiciary Branch needs total reform or elimination. Period.

Elimination is where it's headed and that would be very bad for the Country. Very bad. We don't need this type of Justice.....
1765115307643.webp


Leave it to dimocrap scum to ruin everything. They're a cancer, destroyers of all that's good in the world. Not just the higher-ups, ALL of them. ESPECIALLY the voters, who are the worst of the lot.
 
The Judiciary Branch needs total reform or elimination. Period.

Elimination is where it's headed and that would be very bad for the Country. Very bad. We don't need this type of Justice.....
View attachment 1191330

Leave it to dimocrap scum to ruin everything. They're a cancer, destroyers of all that's good in the world. Not just the higher-ups, ALL of them. ESPECIALLY the voters, who are the worst of the lot.


At least, the crooked leftist judges are being forced to break cover and show America who they really are.
 
DUPE

This should be moved to conspiracy because that is not what the ruling said.

The judge ruled that the evidence was likely a violation of the 4th amendment and will likely be disallowed so to wait for that ruling. It doesn't even prove that Comey authorized the leak. It just proves Richman leaked - not that Comey authorized it.
 
DUPE

This should be moved to conspiracy because that is not what the ruling said.

The judge ruled that the evidence was likely a violation of the 4th amendment and will likely be disallowed so to wait for that ruling. It doesn't even prove that Comey authorized the leak. It just proves Richman leaked - not that Comey authorized it.

How so?

Comey admitted leaking.

 
I thought lefties hated Comey for making Hillary lose in 2016.

Now they love Comey?
If he broke the law I dont care if he pays the penalty. He sucks ass. But Trump railroading people, even conservatives, is bullshit and the slippery slope to authoritarian fascism. No thank you.
 
So Comey DID NOT LIE TO CONGRESS because a lefty judge claims the prosecutor was illegally appointed.

😂

The RUSSIA investigation information WAS NOT LEAKED BY THE FBI TO THE MEDIA?

BECAUSE THE PROSECUTOR WAS “ILLEGALLY” APPOINTED…THERE WAS NO CRIME!!

Amazing.
 
If he broke the law I dont care if he pays the penalty. He sucks ass. But Trump railroading people, even conservatives, is bullshit and the slippery slope to authoritarian fascism. No thank you.

How does the DOJ prove that he broke the law, if the judge won't allow the DOJ/FBI to look at evidence already given to it?
 
15th post
Second line of the article YOU posted: "But legal experts tell ABC News that it doesn't appear that Comey did anything illegal in sharing the information about his meetings with Trump."

He's being investigated for lying to congress and obstructing congress.
 
The judge is a piece of work.


On May 31, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly sentenced Paulette "Paula" Harlow to two years in federal prison and 36 months of supervised release for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act) during a pro-life demonstration at an abortion clinic in 2020. During sentencing, Kollar-Kotelly addressed concerns raised by Harlow’s husband, John, and her attorney, who pleaded for leniency due to her rapidly declining health, warning that imprisonment could endanger her life. In response, the judge referenced Harlow’s religious beliefs, stating:

"I would suggest that, in terms of your religion, one of the tenets is that you should make the effort, during this period of time—when it may be difficult for your husband—to do what is necessary to survive, because that's part of the tenets of your religion."




Trump pardoned her.

On Jan. 23, the president pardoned Harlow and 22 other pro-life activists convicted of violating the federal Freedom of Access to Clinics Act, or FACE Act.


 
"Judge blocks prosecutors’ access to James Comey’s lawyer’s emails and data


Court says government’s retention and use of law professor Daniel Richman’s data appears to have been illegal.





A federal judge dealt a setback Saturday to the Justice Department’s effort to re-indict former FBI Director James Comey, blocking prosecutors’ access to key evidence from email accounts and a computer belonging to close Comey friend and attorney Daniel Richman.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly granted a temporary restraining order sought by Richman’s lawyers, requiring that the evidence be sequestered pending a ruling on Richman’s claim that the government illegally retained his emails and other data.

“The Court concludes that Petitioner Richman is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that the Government has violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures by retaining a complete copy of all files on his personal computer (an ‘image’ of the computer) and searching that image without a warrant,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote in a four-page order filed Saturday, one day after Richman’s attorneys requested the emergency order.

Kollar-Kotelly, a Clinton appointee based in Washington, issued the restraining order before getting a formal response from prosecutors to a petition Richman filed last week seeking return of his data. However, she said a lack of clear indication about who currently has the data and where it is stored supported her conclusion that a temporary order limiting access to the trove of records was warranted.


A copy of the law professor’s personal computer, iCloud account and Columbia University email accounts were obtained by the Justice Department in 2017, following Trump’s firing of Comey as FBI director. Richman allowed investigators to make an image of his computer during an investigation into an alleged disclosure of classified information. The FBI later obtained other records through search warrants."




More resistance from the federal bench. He gave the evidence to the FBI in 2017. Now a judge wants to block its use. :laughing0301:
But there is no deep state.
 
The hold is temporary while the argument on whether or not the information was lawfully acquired.

I know there seems to be a lot of people who want to trash all Constitutional protections.

If the government can show it was lawfully gained, then they will be permitted to use it.

That's how our laws work.
 
Back
Top Bottom