Not in this lifetime, you lying twat.
John Edgar Slow Horses is just another leftist white guy embarrassing real Indians
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not in this lifetime, you lying twat.
Judge Engoron is the one man jury in this trial. Bartov layed it on too thick, that's what shot his credibility down.Without any evidence whatsoever, the biased judge said of Trump's expert witness,
"(Bartov) is a tenured professor, but all that his testimony proves is that for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say,” Engoron said in his ruling.
Trump Denied Instant Win He Sought in NY Civil Fraud Trial
(Bloomberg) -- The New York judge in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial denied the former president’s request for an immediate verdict in his favor, criticizing his defense and suggesting his star witness was motivated by money.Most Read from BloombergApple Races to Tweak Software Ahead of Looming...www.yahoo.com
How can Engoron get away with this? He should be sued for millions of dollars for defaming someone with zero proof. Isn't that what the left are claiming Rudy Giuliani did? How come they can sue Giuliani for the very same thing Judge Engoron is doing and Engoron not be sued for defamation? Another example of the two tiered justice system.
HahahahahaWithout any evidence whatsoever, the biased judge said of Trump's expert witness,
"(Bartov) is a tenured professor, but all that his testimony proves is that for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say,” Engoron said in his ruling.
Trump Denied Instant Win He Sought in NY Civil Fraud Trial
(Bloomberg) -- The New York judge in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial denied the former president’s request for an immediate verdict in his favor, criticizing his defense and suggesting his star witness was motivated by money.Most Read from BloombergApple Races to Tweak Software Ahead of Looming...www.yahoo.com
How can Engoron get away with this? He should be sued for millions of dollars for defaming someone with zero proof. Isn't that what the left are claiming Rudy Giuliani did? How come they can sue Giuliani for the very same thing Judge Engoron is doing and Engoron not be sued for defamation? Another example of the two tiered justice system.
-----------------------------------------------------------"...you demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombies..."
You just earned a "How the Fuck did we Get Here" history lesson presented by Uncle Yuri Bezmenov from 1984 (the year)......-----------------------------------------------------------
I love the peek into MAGA-stan that this chatroom offers us.
Aren't the inhabitants of that fringie-world just the most goshdarn amusing folks you'll ever see?
MAGA....making America great again, by being a nutter?
-----------------------------------------------------------------".... it is himself that is aptly described as a demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist ZOMBIE fucking retarded ASSHOLE."
You can ignore the genuine information I offer you all you want, but you cannot escape the truth of it all......-----------------------------------------------------------------
See?
It's like the best entertainment one can get for free.
Endlessly amusing. Like watching one of those glassed-in ant farms.
If only one could fit all of the above adjectives on a single bumper-sticker.
Maybe a T-shirt? Extra large?
Poor QAnon'r SeaMajor7.
He comes across sometimes kinda like the latrine version of MAGA.
I love this bar!
So, you're saying that judges can defame anyone they want with no consequences.Hahahahaha
What a silly thread.
Judges are expected to render their opinions from the bench. That is literally their job as a judge.
In what fantasyland can judges be sued for doing their jobs?
Get a grip.
Out of curiosity: who fed you this silly talkng point? It's embarrassing.
Another question: did it cross your mind to wonder why Trump's paid witnesses lack credibility? Maybe if you would read a bit about the trial, you would understand.
Loaded question. You have to prove defamation. And you have not.So, you're saying that judges can defame anyone they want with no consequences.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I love the peek into MAGA-stan that this chatroom offers us.
Aren't the inhabitants of that fringie-world just the most goshdarn amusing folks you'll ever see?
MAGA....making America great again, by being a nutter?
Well, I can't speak in an informed manner about Democrats. I ain't one and only go to their luncheons for the featured speakers, same as I do the Republican luncheons."You think MAGA means Not A Democrat...."
Well, I can't speak in an informed manner about Democrats. I ain't one and only go to their luncheons for the featured speakers, same as I do the Republican luncheons.
But, I have been observing the MAGA-think since 2015.
And I am deadsolidperfectly convinced that it is built on the mindset of the conspiracy-prone, grievance-filled, complainer/whiner mindset.
Ne'er-do-wells who look to blame away their own failures.
IMHO
You are either part of the Borg Collective or you are a MAGA.OK, fair enough, I'll update that.
You HUMBLY believe everyone not Democrat is a MAGA Trump supporter.
Happy?
After today's flagrantly undemocratic ruling though, you may almost be right. You guys are running an amazing re-election campaign. I've heard many Democrats before saying Democrats suck and they are voting third party, but it's becoming increasingly constant that DEMOCRATS are coming out for Trump.
Good luck, Sailor!
As Biden would say, I did a booboo in my pants!
I’m surprised they let him get away with it when he basically admitted to changing the jury’s rulings. Didn’t he say something to the effect that “sometimes juries get it wrong” when talking about how he will over rule them, or some such? I can’t remember the exact article.Without any evidence whatsoever, the biased judge said of Trump's expert witness,
"(Bartov) is a tenured professor, but all that his testimony proves is that for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say,” Engoron said in his ruling.
Trump Denied Instant Win He Sought in NY Civil Fraud Trial
(Bloomberg) -- The New York judge in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial denied the former president’s request for an immediate verdict in his favor, criticizing his defense and suggesting his star witness was motivated by money.Most Read from BloombergApple Races to Tweak Software Ahead of Looming...www.yahoo.com
How can Engoron get away with this? He should be sued for millions of dollars for defaming someone with zero proof. Isn't that what the left are claiming Rudy Giuliani did? How come they can sue Giuliani for the very same thing Judge Engoron is doing and Engoron not be sued for defamation? Another example of the two tiered justice system.