Synthaholic
Diamond Member
You also don't accept credible evidence.Democrats don't need evidence. The seriousness of the charge is proof enough it's credible.They also have a choice whether to defend a person. He chose to defend a pedophile because that pedophile has evidence that Dershowitz is a pedophile.
And I'll anxiously await your credible evidence on that.
Democrats are gullible buffoons.
Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. Not Nature of Evidence, Seriousness of the Charge