Judaism in its Own Words

[irosie91]

The Italians bombed Bahrain and Saudi Arabia before Pearl harbor. The British were never in Arabia.

Peter O'TOOLE was in arabia. The Italians were in
Tunisia. and the British were in Bahrain along with
French. the bombings were hitting various
INTERESTS-----not islaaaaam

 

[irosie91]

Atheism isn't a religion.

Adolf was very religious----both Josef and
Magda were also Catholics in GOOD STANDING

 

[ESay]

Those guys won't accept anyone besides Rabbi Nahman until there's an anointed king in Israel.
Strange You'd resort to such a ridiculous logical fallacy because ideals assume there's constant
correction and improvement, as they're absolute. And after all, anyway, they've accepted their
Rabbi from Ukraine, and most of them are anything but...

Maybe You can clarify the question.

I propose to end this question. Never mind.

 

[BackAgain]

Judaism in its Own Words​

False thread headline.

It claims that the words about Judaism are in Judaism’s own words. But the author of the OP only cites to SOME Jews’ works. So, it’s clearly NOT in the words of Judaism. It is some thoughts by some Jews about Judaism.

Not the same thing.

 

[hobelim]

HUH? what's the deep dark secret??

the teaching that food is the subject of kashrut is the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate.

Tell @Indeependent that the onus is on Jews and Gentiles to comply with the Law, so deal with it.

It's not a deep dark secret...anymore at least. No need to thank me. I have only done my duty..

 

[alang1216]

It doesn't let Hitler and atheism off the hook though. Atheism is basically an immoral religion because it has no rules of behavior and conduct. You demonstrate one who is a liar and have become MORE of a liar since conversion. You were much more open minded before.

"Although, in theory, atheists can lead moral lives, the absence of an absolute moral foundation probably leads to moral drifting over time. This phenomenon also occurs in Christians who abandon church and Christian fellowship. As a result, the differences in morality between atheists and evangelicals is striking, with atheists being much more prone to viewing pornography, using profanity in public, gossiping, and drunkenness. For the 8 sins surveyed in the Barna study, atheists were nearly 5 times more likely to commit those sins than evangelical Christians. In addition, atheists are much less likely to donate to charities (even secular ones) and perform volunteer services in their communities compared with religious people. So, even though atheists can lead a moral life, on average, they don't measure up. Although it is possible that atheism is not the cause of moral failure, it seems unlikely that there are genetic or other demographic factors that account for the differences in behavior."

Atheism Doesn't Lead to Immoral Behavior or Poor Ethics - Or Does It?

www.godandscience.org

Can you name a crime that Christians have not committed? And spare me the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.

 

[BackAgain]

Can you name a crime that Christians have not committed? And spare me the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.

What a stupid question. Any person of any faith can commit a crime. Some minor, some truly heinous. The inquisition took place. That doesn’t mean Christianity endorsed it. In fact, the contrary is plainly true.

So, why ask the question?

 

[Lisa558]

Who can explain, why non-Jews shall admire Jews and believe their hate against another religions, at first against Christianity and Islam?
MS medias feed us daily only Christians are nazis, murders, haters, bigots, blasphemers,trump disciples, racists etc. etc. etc.
But not one solely word about Judaism.
The hate like below is being preached on daily basis in any synagogue.
Do you know such requirements in Christianity or Islam?

"You are Adam ["man"], but goyim [gentiles] are not called Adam ["man"]." Kerithoth 6b

"The seed of the goyim is like an animal." Sanhedrin 74b

"All Gentile children are animals." Yebamoth 98a

"The best of the gentiles: kill him; the best of snakes: smash its skull; the best of women: is filled with witchcraft." Kiddushin 66c The uncensored version of this text appears in Tractate Soferim (New York, M. Higer, 1937), 15:7, p. 282. "The best of the gentiles should all be killed" (http://talmudical.blogspot.com). From the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, 'Gentile,' (p. 617).

The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jews (Ma'ariv 09.11.09 (p. 2) by Roi Sharon) http://www.nrg.co.il. Here is a full translation of the article in the Maariv newspaper of Israel didiremez.wordpress.com

Rabbi Eliyahu exhorts the killing of women and children: jpost.com

Rabbis Yitzhak Ginzburg and Yaakov Yosef endorse Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro's 2009 book endorsing the killing of babies and children, adding "It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for [threatening Israel]. If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments—because we care about the commandments—there is nothing wrong with the murder" (haaretz.com).

"Who is funding the rabbis who endorse killing Gentile babies?" By Akiva Eldar, Ha'aretz, 11/17/09
". . . For example, [Israel's] government ministries regularly transfer support and funding to a yeshiva whose rabbi determined that it is permissible to kill gentile babies "because their presence assists murder, and there is reason to harm children if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us . . . it is permissible to harm the children of a leader in order to stop him from acting evilly . . . we have seen in the Halakha that even babies of gentiles who do not violate the seven Noahide laws, there is cause to kill them because of the future threat that will be caused if they are raised to be wicked people like their parents. . ." (haaretz.com).

". . . 'living soul' designates Israel because they are children of the Almighty, and their souls, which are holy, come from Him. From whence come the souls of other peoples? R[abbi] Eleazar said: 'They obtain souls from those sides of the left which convey impurity, and therefore they are all impure and defile those who have contact with them.'. . .'living soul' refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and 'cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth,' to the other peoples who are not 'living soul," but who are as we have said." Bereshith 47a

"Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever . . . their material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews. . ." Abraham Foxbrunner. Habad: The Hasidism of Schneur Zalman of Lyady. Northvale NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1983. p. 108-109.

Rabbinic Text or Call to Terror? By Daniel Estrin, Published January 20, 2010, issue of January 29, 2010.
JERUSALEM—The marble-patterned, hardcover book embossed with gold Hebrew letters looks like any other religious commentary you'd find in an Orthodox Judaica bookstore—but reads like a rabbinic instruction manual outlining acceptable scenarios for killing non-Jewish babies, children and adults.

"The prohibition 'Thou Shalt Not Murder'" applies only "to a Jew who kills a Jew," write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar. Non-Jews are "uncompassionate by nature" and attacks on them "curb their evil inclination," while babies and children of Israel's enemies may be killed since "it is clear that they will grow to harm us" (forward.com).

"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [N.Y. Times, February 28, 1994, p. 1] at the eulogy for Dr. Baruch Goldstein, Kach Party terrorist who used a machine gun to murder at least 39 Palestinians worshipping at Cave of the Patriarchs mosque in Hebron. Rabbis praised his mass murder and then Prime Minister Yitshak Rabin gave permission for a memorial to honor Goldstein. Here's a picture of the shrine to the mass murderer.

"The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species." Rabbi Saadya Grama, Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut ("Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile") 2003.

"Souls of non-Jews come entirely from the female part of the Satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jews are called evil." [Yesaiah Tishbi, Torat ha-Rave-ha-Kelippahnbe-Kabbalat ha-Ari (The Theory of Evil and the Satanic Sphere in Kabbalah) 1942, reprinted 1982] The Messianic age of restoration and redemption (tikkun olam) forecast by the religion of Judaism and spoon-fed to their partisans among the goyim, posits a world restored to universal harmony and justice. That's the cover story, anyway. But the truth is it is somewhat more macabre, as Tishby relates: ". . . the presence of Israel among the nations mends the world, but not the nations of the world . . . . It does not bring the nations closer to holiness, but rather it extracts the holiness from them and thereby destroys their ability to exist . . . [T]he purpose of the full redemption is to destroy the vitality of all the peoples"], Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 13: 9780970378453, p.774-775

"Even when we seek revenge, it is important to make one thing clear—the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs. The Talmud states that if gentiles rob Israel of silver they will pay it back in gold, and all that is taken will be paid back in folds, but in cases like these there is nothing to pay back, since as I said—the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs" ("Rabbi Eliyahu: Life of one yeshiva boy worth more than 1,000 Arabs," Kobi Nahshoni, Ynet, April 3, 2008, ynetnews.com).

Because Gentiles are not human, Gentiles are owed no debt of morality or decency—not honesty [Baba Kamma 113a], not property [Baba Mezia 24a], not even life!—"The best of the Gentiles should all be killed" Soferim 15, 10.

"Some of the Turks and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does." Maimonides explaining who is not fit "to participate in the world to come" (Guide for the Perplexed, Book III, chapter 51 cited in Israel Shahak, Hebrew University Professor, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years. London: Pluto Press, 1997. p. 25).

". . . the explanation of the matter, [is to be found] in light of what Rabbi Chayim Vital wrote in Shaar HaKedushah (and in Etz Chayim, Portal 5, ch. 2)—that every Jew, whether righteous or wicked, possesses two souls, as it is written, "And neshamot (souls) which I have made. . . The second, uniquely Jewish, soul is truly "a part of G-d above, The souls of the nations of the world (the Gentiles), however, emanate from the other, unclean kelipot which contain no good whatever, as is written in Etz Chayim, Portal 40, ch. 3, that all the good that (Gentiles) do, is done out of selfish motives. So the Gemara comments on the verse, "The kindness of (Gentiles) is sin"—that all the charity and kindness done by (Gentiles) of the world is only for their self-glorification. . ." (Chapters 1 and 2) The lower category consists of three completely unclean and evil kelipot, containing no good whatever. . . From them flow and are derived the souls of all the nations of the world (Gentiles), and the sustaining force of their bodies. Also derived from these kelipot are the souls of all living creatures that are unclean and forbidden to be eaten, and the sustaining force of their bodies" (Tanya, Chapter 6 (chabad.org).

"Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered father of the messianic tendency in Jewish fundamentalism, said, 'The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.' Rabbi Kook's entire teaching. . . is followed devoutly by, among others, those who have led the settler movement in the occupied West Bank. . . According to the ideologies which underlie Gush Emunum, the militant West Bank settlers group, and Hasidism, non-Jews have 'Satanic souls'. . . Members of Gush Emunum argue that 'what appears to be confiscation of Arab-owned land for subsequent settlement by Jews is in reality not an act of stealing but one of sanctification.' From their perspective the land is redeemed by being transferred from the Satanic to the divine sphere. . . Common to both the Talmud and the Halacha, Orthodox religious law, is a differentiation between Jews and non-Jews. The highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mandel Schneerson, who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well [and proclaimed himself messiah], explained that 'The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: 'Let us differentiate.' Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of 'let us differentiate' between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of all nations of the world.'" Allan C. Brownfield, "It Is Time to Confront the Exclusionary Ethnocentrism," Issues of the American Council for Judaism, Winter 2000, cited in Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, p.365-366.

Chabad leader Rebbe Schneerson taught that Christianity is a form of mental illness.See his video here:
mauricepinay.blogspot.com. More on Chabad: revisionistreview.blogspot.com.

"And for Christians let there be no hope. . ." Birkat HaMinim, "Benediction" #12 of the Shmone Esreh.

"It is our duty to praise the Master of All, to ascribe greatness to the molder of primeval creation, for He has not made us like the nations of the lands, for He has not assigned our portion like theirs nor our lot like theirs, for they bow to vanity and emptiness and pray to a god who cannot save—man, ash, blood, bile, stinking flesh, maggot, defiled men and women, adulterers and adulteresses, dying in their iniquity and rotting in their wickedness, worn out dust, rot of maggot [and worm]—and pray to a god who cannot save." Aleinu from Judaic prayer book, Two Nations in Your Womb, Israel Jacob Yuval, University of California Press, 2006, p. 119

"I want to attack their souls." Rabbi Abraham Heschel, interviewed by Geula Cohen for Ma'ariv, January 4, 1965 as translated by AJC/Paris (mauricepinay.blogspot.com).

"Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate—healthy, virile hate—for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German." Elie Wiesel: Legends of Our Time, "Appointment with Hate, NY, Avon, 1968, p. 177-178.

"I too, like Hitler, believe in the power of the blood idea"—Chaim Nachman Bailik, Israel's national poet, in "The Present Hour" (1934).


ABORTION: WHO IS HUMAN? WHO IS NOT?

Judaism excuses abortion through the "rodef" pilpul, that the baby is a rodef, a pursuer, an aggressor, whose life the mother may take. (Among many, see "Jewish Law Favors Stem Cell Research," Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, July 30, 2004). Judaism teaches that the baby is not "nefesh," a person, until it is born.

"Rashi, the venerated twelfth century Judaic interpreter of the Bible and Talmud, says of the fetus" 'lav nefesh hu—it is not a person." Rabbi Meir Abulafia decreed, 'So long as the fetus is inside the womb, it is not a nefesh and the Torah has no pity on it." The noted Judaic legal scholar Rabbi Isaac Schorr stated: 'The sense of the Talmud is that a fetus is not a person' (Responsa Koah Schorr, no. 20 ["responsa" are authoritative in Judaism and supersede the plain text of the "Hebrew Bible"]). The Talmud contains the expression 'ubar yerech imo'—the fetus is the thigh of its mother, i..e., the fetus is deemed to be part of the pregnant woman's body. The Greek philosopher Aristotle regarded the unborn child in its first seven days as a 'secretion' (ekrysis). In rabbinic law the status of 'secretion' lasts for the first forty days of gestation. In Judaism the woman is not regarded as pregnant until the baby in her womb is more than forty days old.

"Contrary to these traditions of Judaism, God did not say in the Bible that He recognized the unborn baby only after forty days. He said He recognized it as a being before the child had even formed in the womb (Jeremiah 1:5). As usual, the rabbis go God one better and establish a term of forty days before recognition can be conferred, and that rabbinic recognition is only of the pregnancy itself, not of the humanity of the child.

"The matter does not rest at the forty day limit, however. In the familiar pattern of rabbinic modification, supplementation, and emendation, enough of these are generated to allow abortion at any time during the pregnancy for almost any reason, however fanciful or arbitrary. For example, if it is decided that an aborted baby does not look like a baby after it has been aborted, then it is not considered to have been an aborted child (Tosefta Niddah 4:5-6)

"Since the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, the standard American abortion procedure is considerably Talmudic in nature, since the Talmud specifically states that if the unborn baby is adduced to be a rodef the rabbis authorize that it can be chopped up at any time: 'They chop up the child in her womb' (Mishnah Ohalot 7:6)"—Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, ISBN 9780970378453, p. 878-879.


JUDAISM'S HERMENEUTIC OF DECEIT. SIX CATEGORIES OF LYING PERMITTED BY THE TORAH:

For scholarship (including Torah scholarship), sexuality, and hospitality (The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition, Vol II, p. 49).

lying to gentiles (Baba Kamma 113a)

for "peace" (meaning, "it's OK to lie to keep out of trouble") (Yebamoth 65b).

when everyone should know you are lying, "guzmah" (Hullin 90b).

It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jewish person or his property. One who mosers a Jewish person or his property has no share in the world to come (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388).

Judaism in its own Words Who is Human? Who is Not?

Christianity strictly condemns anti-humane hate spreading by Judaism

JESUS, PAUL AND THE APOSTLES SAID THE PHARISEES WERE:

accused by Moses John 5:45-47
adversaries to all men I Thessalonians 2:14
agents of the devil John 8:44
blind Matthew 23:26
blind guides Matthew 23:16, 17, 19, 24
children of Hell Matthew 23:15
children of the Devil John 8:44
crucifiers Matthew 23:34
dangerous leaven Matthew 16:6-12; Mark 8:15; Luke 12:1
defectors Matthew 15:6; Mark 7:9, 13; John 5:45, 46, 47
deicides I Thessalonians 2:14-15
dogs Matthew 7:6; Revelation 22:16
foolish Matthew 23:17
full of dead men's bones Matthew 23:27
haters of God John 15:24,25
hypocrites Matthew 23:13-15, 23, 25, 27-29
idolaters Apocalypse 22:16
iniquitous Matthew 23:28
killers of the just Matthew 23:35
killers of the prophets Matthew 23:37; I Thessalonians 2:14-15
liars John 8:44, 55; Revelation 3:9, 22:16
murderers Matthew 23:31; Revelation 22:15
offspring of vipers Luke 3:7
purveyors of fables Titus 1:13-14
serpents Matthew 23:33
sorcerers Revelation 22:16
swine Matthew 7:6
synagogue of Satan Revelation 2:9; 3:9
unchaste Revelation 22:16
unclean Matthew 23:25
vipers Matthew 3:7; 12:34; 23:33
void the commandments of God for the traditions of men Mark 7:8-9
whited sepulchers Matthew 23:27

axe laid to the root Matthew 3:10
cast into the fire Matthew 3:10; 7:19; Luke 3:9
condemned Mark 16:16
cut down Matthew 3:10
in vain do they worship me Matthew 15:9; Mark 7:7
judgment of Hell Matthew 23:33
shall be broken Matthew 21:44
shall be ground into powder Matthew 21:44
the kingdom of God shall be taken from you Matthew 21:43
woe Matthew 23:13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 25, 27; Luke 11:42, 46, 47, 52
wrath Matthew 3:7; Luke 3:7; 21:23; St. Paul in I Thessalonians 2:16
you do not enter the kingdom of Heaven Matthew 23:13

Probably therefore Judaism hates Christianity so much and destroy it within

That was an awful lot of work when you could have just said “I’m an antisemite.”

 

[irosie91]

What a stupid question. Any person of any faith can commit a crime. Some minor, some truly heinous. The inquisition took place. That doesn’t mean Christianity endorsed it. In fact, the contrary is plainly true.

So, why ask the question?

Christianity at the time of the Inquisition was
the Roman Catholic church which conducted the
Inquisition according to IT OWN CANON LAW

 

[alang1216]

What a stupid question. Any person of any faith can commit a crime. Some minor, some truly heinous. The inquisition took place. That doesn’t mean Christianity endorsed it. In fact, the contrary is plainly true.

So, why ask the question?

What an ignorant response.

Was the Spanish Inquisition approved by the pope?
The Roman Catholic Church had established inquisitions in the past. Taking their name from the Latin verb inquiro (“inquire into”), these commissions had authority to question supposed heretics about their religious practices and loyalties starting in the 13th century.
In 1478 Pope Sixtus IV issued a papal bull, or decree, authorizing the Catholic Monarchs to name inquisitors in order to enforce religious uniformity and to expel Jews from Spain.

 

[rylah]

I propose to end this question. Never mind.

Can You share Your thoughts
on the Universal and Cosmopolitan,
as ideals besides the reference to religions?

 

[james bond]

Can you name a crime that Christians have not committed? And spare me the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.

They haven't committed the horrible atrocities of atheist communism which killed somewhere between 40,472,000 and 259,432,000s lives. That doesn't even include the numbers for atheist communism and torture. They haven't committed atheist mass murders and had sociopathic leaders.

"Theodore Beale notes concerning atheism and mass murder:

“

Apparently it was just an amazing coincidence that every Communist of historical note publicly declared his atheism … .there have been twenty-eight countries in world history that can be confirmed to have been ruled by regimes with avowed atheists at the helm … These twenty-eight historical regimes have been ruled by eighty-nine atheists, of whom more than half have engaged in democidal acts of the sort committed by Stalin and Mao … The total body count for the ninety years between 1917 and 2007 is approximately 148 million dead at the bloody hands of fifty-two atheists, three times more than all the human beings killed by war, civil war, and individual crime in the entire twentieth century combined. The historical record of collective atheism is thus 182,716 times worse on an annual basis than Christianity’s worst and most infamous misdeed, the Spanish Inquisition. It is not only Stalin and Mao who were so murderously inclined, they were merely the worst of the whole Hell-bound lot. For every Pol Pot whose infamous name is still spoken with horror today, there was a Mengistu, a Bierut, and a Choibalsan, godless men whose names are now forgotten everywhere but in the lands they once ruled with a red hand. Is a 58 percent chance that an atheist leader will murder a noticeable percentage of the population over which he rules sufficient evidence that atheism does, in fact, provide a systematic influence to do bad things? If that is not deemed to be conclusive, how about the fact that the average atheist crime against humanity is 18.3 million percent worse than the very worst depredation committed by Christians, even though atheists have had less than one-twentieth the number of opportunities with which to commit them. If one considers the statistically significant size of the historical atheist set and contrasts it with the fact that not one in a thousand religious leaders have committed similarly large-scale atrocities, it is impossible to conclude otherwise, even if we do not yet understand exactly why this should be the case. Once might be an accident, even twice could be coincidence, but fifty-two incidents in ninety years reeks of causation![4][5]

Atheist atrocities - Conservapedia

www.conservapedia.com

Obviously, we have not lied as much as the atheists here like you. After reading this, you can understand why I say ANTD.

 

[BreezeWood]

What a stupid question. Any person of any faith can commit a crime. Some minor, some truly heinous. The inquisition took place. That doesn’t mean Christianity endorsed it. In fact, the contrary is plainly true.

So, why ask the question?

then who do you think ran the inquisition - innocent boy off the street ...

"they really weren't christians" ... boy wonder strikes again.

 

[BreezeWood]

That was an awful lot of work when you could have just said “I’m an antisemite.”

- just blew past your inconsequential aptitude as their reason for being one.

 

[BackAgain]

Christianity at the time of the Inquisition was
the Roman Catholic church which conducted the
Inquisition according to IT OWN CANON LAW

Ok. But that has little to do with the teachings of Jesus. So whatever else it was, it wasn’t Christianity.

 

[irosie91]

Ok. But that has little to do with the teachings of Jesus. So whatever else it was, it wasn’t Christianity.

You are a little confused. The person who orchestrated the compilation of the "NEW TESTAMENT" was Constantine. He also developed CANON LAW---ie the law of the catholic church based on that which
he determined to be CHRIST'S LAW----his descendant----I think, JUSTIN, codified his laws into JUSTINIAN LAW ---which is nothing more or less than the LAW of the Catholic Church which also ESTABLISHES THE INQUISITION

 

[BackAgain]

What an ignorant response.

Was the Spanish Inquisition approved by the pope?
The Roman Catholic Church had established inquisitions in the past. Taking their name from the Latin verb inquiro (“inquire into”), these commissions had authority to question supposed heretics about their religious practices and loyalties starting in the 13th century.
In 1478 Pope Sixtus IV issued a papal bull, or decree, authorizing the Catholic Monarchs to name inquisitors in order to enforce religious uniformity and to expel Jews from Spain.

What an asshole rejoinder. Was it ever even hinted at by anything taught by Jesus. Hint: the answer is no, you moron. Therefore, it wasn’t Christianity. Nice try. (Not really. Actually, a total fail by you.)

 

[irosie91]

What an asshole rejoinder. Was it ever even hinted at by anything taught by Jesus. Hint: the answer is no, you moron. Therefore, it wasn’t Christianity. Nice try. (Not really. Actually, a total fail by you.)

You have no idea what Jesus "taught". That which
you "know" about Jesus----was edited by the
NICEAN COUNCIL

 

[BackAgain]

then who do you think ran the inquisition - innocent boy off the street ...

View attachment 650197

"they really weren't christians" ... boy wonder strikes again.

The ones who did it called themselves Christians. You idiot. That doesn’t mean they adhered to the principles taught by Jesus Christ. How fucking retarded are you? I’m guessing you’re a moron. You might be a total imbecile, however.

 

[BackAgain]

You are a little confused. The person who orchestrated the compilation of the "NEW TESTAMENT" was Constantine. He also developed CANON LAW---ie the law of the catholic church based on that which
he determined to be CHRIST'S LAW----his descendant----I think, JUSTIN, codified his laws into JUSTINIAN LAW ---which is nothing more or less than the LAW of the Catholic Church which also ESTABLISHES THE INQUISITION

You are a lot confused. That’s a certainty.

If the “law” wasn’t consistent with the teachings of Jesus, then labeling it as “Christianity” doesn’t make it Christianity. What would make the law “Christian” would be consistency with the teachings of Jesus. This stuff isn’t all that hard. Get an adult to help you follow along.