At the time that Broaddick and Clinton had their one night stand, Anita was married to one man and having an affair with another. She told both men that Clinton raped her. Yet she continued to work on his campaign and never distanced herself from him.
Now divorced from her first husband, and married to her lover, Anita Broaddrick signed an affidavit in the Paula Jones Trial saying Bill Clinton did not rape her. Ken Starr threatened to arrest her for perjury, using her ex-husband's testimony that she told him Clinton raped her, unless she recanted that affidavit and said he raped her.
Starr gave her immunity from prosecution if she recanted her affidavit, and promised to send her to jail, if she didn't. So Anita changed her story - again.
So which time was Anita telling the truth - when she went home after the incident and only told the two other men she was involved with that she was raped, when she willingly signed an affidavit saying she was never raped, or when she was threatened with jail unless she said Clinton raped her.
Common sense says that the only story that makes sense is her affidavit in the Jones Trial. She was under no pressure to say it never happened. She wasn't risking her marriage in saying it wasn't true.
The coerced rape claim made after Starr's threats and the coercion involved has invalidates it completely. That testimoney would NEVER be admissable in a trial.