at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
Again, shocking that y'all have to be reminded of this but ---- we don't elect Presidents. The Electoral College does.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
Again, shocking that y'all have to be reminded of this but ---- we don't elect Presidents. The Electoral College does.
An actual act of journalism reveals major problems.
You know why all this is irrelevant? And it astounds me that I have to remind anyone of this....
We don't elect Presidents via elections. We elect them via the Electoral College. That body advises Congress, in December, what their vote is. They don't need an election to do that.
An actual act of journalism reveals major problems.
You know why all this is irrelevant? And it astounds me that I have to remind anyone of this....
We don't elect Presidents via elections. We elect them via the Electoral College. That body advises Congress, in December, what their vote is. They don't need an election to do that.
at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
Again, shocking that y'all have to be reminded of this but ---- we don't elect Presidents. The Electoral College does.
who said otherwise???
at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
Again, shocking that y'all have to be reminded of this but ---- we don't elect Presidents. The Electoral College does.
who said otherwise???
Who said someone said otherwise?
It means that the premise of this thread is meaningless. It's that simple.
maybe if you took time to watch it you would know why,,,One point, if we don’t know who won for a week after the election, we will be okay.
Not sure why this guy thinks that’s “bedlam” but he seems to be a bit of a drama queen.
at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
Again, shocking that y'all have to be reminded of this but ---- we don't elect Presidents. The Electoral College does.
who said otherwise???
Who said someone said otherwise?
It means that the premise of this thread is meaningless. It's that simple.
how so???
at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
Again, shocking that y'all have to be reminded of this but ---- we don't elect Presidents. The Electoral College does.
who said otherwise???
Who said someone said otherwise?
It means that the premise of this thread is meaningless. It's that simple.
how so???
"November will be chaos"? Why? We don't need no steenkeen elections. Nothing in the COTUS requires one.
One point, if we don’t know who won for a week after the election, we will be okay.
Not sure why this guy thinks that’s “bedlam” but he seems to be a bit of a drama queen.
at this point anyone advocating for mail in voting is intentionally trying to subvert the election,,,
Again, shocking that y'all have to be reminded of this but ---- we don't elect Presidents. The Electoral College does.
who said otherwise???
Who said someone said otherwise?
It means that the premise of this thread is meaningless. It's that simple.
how so???
"November will be chaos"? Why? We don't need no steenkeen elections. Nothing in the COTUS requires one.
so you just want to declare trump president without an election???
An actual act of journalism reveals major problems.
You know why all this is irrelevant? And it astounds me that I have to remind anyone of this....
We don't elect Presidents via elections. We elect them via the Electoral College. That body advises Congress, in December, what their vote is. They don't need an election to do that.
WRONG!!!
You barely made it through the 2000 debacle, this time it will get real. Banana republic style...lolOne point, if we don’t know who won for a week after the election, we will be okay.
Not sure why this guy thinks that’s “bedlam” but he seems to be a bit of a drama queen.
An actual act of journalism reveals major problems.
You know why all this is irrelevant? And it astounds me that I have to remind anyone of this....
We don't elect Presidents via elections. We elect them via the Electoral College. That body advises Congress, in December, what their vote is. They don't need an election to do that.
WRONG!!!
Linkie?
An actual act of journalism reveals major problems.
You know why all this is irrelevant? And it astounds me that I have to remind anyone of this....
We don't elect Presidents via elections. We elect them via the Electoral College. That body advises Congress, in December, what their vote is. They don't need an election to do that.
WRONG!!!
Linkie?
which state are you talking about, cause different states have different rules???
An actual act of journalism reveals major problems.
You know why all this is irrelevant? And it astounds me that I have to remind anyone of this....
We don't elect Presidents via elections. We elect them via the Electoral College. That body advises Congress, in December, what their vote is. They don't need an election to do that.
WRONG!!!
Linkie?
which state are you talking about, cause different states have different rules???
All 57. The COTUS says the several states shall choose electors "in such manner as the legislature may direct". That leaves it wide open. A given state can draw names from a hat if they want to. Sure they like to set up "elections" as it makes for good TV Bread-and-Circus and gives the impression of a democracy. But it's all a puppet show.