John Podesta lies about Maui fire, will anyone hold him accountable?

A question for global warming deniers:

If you took 2 containers, one with plain air and the other with air mixed with a large amount of Co2. Then you heated both up to the same high temperature:

1. The heat would dissipate and return to room temp in both containers, in the same amount of time.

2. The one containing with pure air would return to room temperature faster than the one with the air Co2 mix.

3. The container with the Co2 mix would return to room temperature faster than the one with pure air.
 
A question for global warming deniers:

If you took 2 containers, one with plain air and the other with air mixed with a large amount of Co2. Then you heated both up to the same high temperature:

1. The heat would dissipate and return to room temp in both containers, in the same amount of time.

2. The one containing with pure air would return to room temperature faster than the one with the air Co2 mix.

3. The container with the Co2 mix would return to room temperature faster than the one with pure air.



If we have two and only two measures of Earth atmosphere, satellites and balloons, and both show NO WARMING during a period of rising Co2, should we accept the data and conclude Co2 does nothing, or should we fudge the data and claim "warming" where none exists to keep the Co2 FRAUd going?
 
A question for global warming deniers:

If you took 2 containers, one with plain air and the other with air mixed with a large amount of Co2. Then you heated both up to the same high temperature:

1. The heat would dissipate and return to room temp in both containers, in the same amount of time.

2. The one containing with pure air would return to room temperature faster than the one with the air Co2 mix.

3. The container with the Co2 mix would return to room temperature faster than the one with pure air.
Now wait a minute you're assuming that these nuts actually have an understanding of science. That is a big leap to make.
 
There is zero evidence of human caused globalclimatewarmingchange. There are computer generated models and opinion pieces. That’s it.


There is urban heat sink effect. Tokyo was 10F warmer than surrounding undeveloped land, but has since mandated plants on rooftops etc.

When you go from nature to Tokyo, you warm 10F. Nashville has warmed about 5F from Urban Heat, and Urban Heat is THE ONLY WARMING the Co2 FRAUD has in the raw data.
 
There is urban heat sink effect. Tokyo was 10F warmer than surrounding undeveloped land, but has since mandated plants on rooftops etc.

When you go from nature to Tokyo, you warm 10F. Nashville has warmed about 5F from Urban Heat, and Urban Heat is THE ONLY WARMING the Co2 FRAUD has in the raw data.
Can I cook the pizza on the Tokyo rooftop?
 
Can I cook the pizza on the Tokyo rooftop?


Are you a left wing hate hoaxing homo hiding in the closet???



R.2624a61290a75149f0e82bae2a59b06d
 
If we have two and only two measures of Earth atmosphere, satellites and balloons, and both show NO WARMING during a period of rising Co2, should we accept the data and conclude Co2 does nothing, or should we fudge the data and claim "warming" where none exists to keep the Co2 FRAUd going?

Thanks for not answering my question.

Should we believe the NOAA & NASA or should believe you, a nutcase climate denier?


 

Forum List

Back
Top