John Kelly resigning...no longer on speaking terms with Trump

fullsizeoutput_1709.jpeg
 
There goes one of the last voices of reason in this administration. Strap in, people, it's gonna get bumpy.


Kelly doesn't want to be around when Mueller throws the net over Trump's head.
.
.
.
No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.

Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
I never use Fox.

You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabby
 
Kelly doesn't want to be around when Mueller throws the net over Trump's head.
.
.
.
No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.

Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
I never use Fox.

You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabby

No, that is managing. Now just because you type something doesn't make it true.
 
Kelly doesn't want to be around when Mueller throws the net over Trump's head.
.
.
.
No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.

Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
I never use Fox.

You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabby

None of that matters. What matters is having your own initiative. It is fine to have the initiative; as long as it doesn’t make the Jabba The Trump look bad. When the blob was afraid of the rain, Kelly decided that this was just too ridiculous to cosign, went to the ceremony and chubs was shown in a bad light.

I heard a story once that when they were casting the Apprentice, none of the contestants could be taller than him. Not sure if it is true or not, I only watched the show a few times…but I heard the story more than once so I’m apt to believe it.
 
Seems every time the Mueller investigation heats up.......Trump fires someone to distract the media
 
No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.

Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
I never use Fox.

You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabby

No, that is managing. Now just because you type something doesn't make it true.

No, it's micro managing and no place in the work force in this day and age.
 
No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.

Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
I never use Fox.

You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabby

No, that is managing. Now just because you type something doesn't make it true.
Correct term would be sidelining Kelly's job as Chief of Staff and the understanding between them that Kelly insisted on when he took the post. Trump sidelined Kelly. And really - this has been the problem with this Administration from day one. I expect we will see a return to the backstabbing, leaking, infighting and chaos that characterized it previously. Not a good thing this high high turnover.

Now..are you going to contribute or...troll? If you disagree, provide your arguments and sources. Preferably not Fox.

Here is one link, from April: Trump freezes out chief of staff John Kelly, says he's "tired of being told 'no'"
 
Kelly provided valuable advice and ran a tight ship

Trump will miss his guidance once the Mueller investigation drops and his world starts to crumble around him
 
Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
I never use Fox.

You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabby

No, that is managing. Now just because you type something doesn't make it true.
Correct term would be sidelining Kelly's job as Chief of Staff and the understanding between them that Kelly insisted on when he took the post. Trump sidelined Kelly. And really - this has been the problem with this Administration from day one. I expect we will see a return to the backstabbing, leaking, infighting and chaos that characterized it previously. Not a good thing this high high turnover.

Now..are you going to contribute or...troll? If you disagree, provide your arguments and sources. Preferably not Fox.

Here is one link, from April: Trump freezes out chief of staff John Kelly, says he's "tired of being told 'no'"
"Preferably not FOX". In other words you are claiming that what is presented on FOX is not legitimate.
How juvenile of you.
If only everyone would only watch Don Lemon and Madcow then everyone would actually know the facts....right?
Or should we only read WAPO and NYT.....right. Or only read the Guardian right?
Frankly pal I thought you were more "woke" than to tell people what to watch and listen to. This is after all still a free country right.
How 'free' would it be if you could stop FOX from broadcasting.
You just lost any respect I used to have for you.
 
All this time he wanted Ayer's and today Ayer's and Trump could not come to an agreement and Ayer's offered to stand in temporarily. Nope, looks like Ayer's will not be chief of staff because he want's to move back to Ga, he also put in notice he is resigning from Pence and end of year and moving.

Now this Ayer's guy seems pretty intelligent, do you suppose he see's the writing on the wall and doesn't want any party of D.C?
 
"Preferably not FOX". In other words you are claiming that what is presented on FOX is not legitimate.
How juvenile of you.
If only everyone would only watch Don Lemon and Madcow then everyone would actually know the facts....right?
Or should we only read WAPO and NYT.....right. Or only read the Guardian right?
Frankly pal I thought you were more "woke" than to tell people what to watch and listen to. This is after all still a free country right.
How 'free' would it be if you could stop FOX from broadcasting.
You just lost any respect I used to have for you.

Yep, having Trumpravda disparaged, that cannot stand!

But that was a nice victim card near the end - they want to stop Trumpravda from broadcasting now? Really, no one would do that, and deprive a bunch of geezers of their political porn. Dannyboys...
 
Why would Trump want a chief of staff anyway?

For the same reason he hired Cohen, Pence, and Stormy (etc.): Someone to do the dirty work, and say "yes", and "you're the greatest," best 24/7.

From what I read in “Fear” he is his own chief of staff.

Of course he is, and his own Secretary of State, his own campaign manager, his communications director, and whatnot. He's a narcissistic megalomaniac after all. And that's why I stated he needs someone to do the "dirty work" in complete subservience to the Mob Boss.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top