Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabbyI never use Fox.No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.There goes one of the last voices of reason in this administration. Strap in, people, it's gonna get bumpy.
Kelly doesn't want to be around when Mueller throws the net over Trump's head.
.
.
.
Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabbyI never use Fox.No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.Kelly doesn't want to be around when Mueller throws the net over Trump's head.
.
.
.
Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
You can't prove what you typed either.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabbyI never use Fox.No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.Kelly doesn't want to be around when Mueller throws the net over Trump's head.
.
.
.
Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
You can't prove what you typed either.
No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.There goes one of the last voices of reason in this administration. Strap in, people, it's gonna get bumpy.
Kelly doesn't want to be around when Mueller throws the net over Trump's head.
.
.
.
Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabbyI never use Fox.No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.
Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
You can't prove what you typed either.
No, that is managing. Now just because you type something doesn't make it true.
Actually he wasWhat’s sad to consider is that Kelly likely believed he was still serving his country by trying to keep a madman like Trump in check.What an end to a once proud military careerJohn Kelly joins the rest who have sullied their name and disgraced their service with their servitude to the criminal Trump cabal.
Pandering to a child like, egotistical dotard
Correct term would be sidelining Kelly's job as Chief of Staff and the understanding between them that Kelly insisted on when he took the post. Trump sidelined Kelly. And really - this has been the problem with this Administration from day one. I expect we will see a return to the backstabbing, leaking, infighting and chaos that characterized it previously. Not a good thing this high high turnover.Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabbyI never use Fox.No. Trump treated Kelly like crap.
Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
You can't prove what you typed either.
No, that is managing. Now just because you type something doesn't make it true.
"Preferably not FOX". In other words you are claiming that what is presented on FOX is not legitimate.Correct term would be sidelining Kelly's job as Chief of Staff and the understanding between them that Kelly insisted on when he took the post. Trump sidelined Kelly. And really - this has been the problem with this Administration from day one. I expect we will see a return to the backstabbing, leaking, infighting and chaos that characterized it previously. Not a good thing this high high turnover.Sure I can. Trump totally overrode Kelly, hiring new people that reported directly to Trump, not the chief of stafc, effectively side lining the position. That is shabbyI never use Fox.Prove it with a non biased source. Don't use FOX.
You can't prove what you typed either.
No, that is managing. Now just because you type something doesn't make it true.
Now..are you going to contribute or...troll? If you disagree, provide your arguments and sources. Preferably not Fox.
Here is one link, from April: Trump freezes out chief of staff John Kelly, says he's "tired of being told 'no'"
"Preferably not FOX". In other words you are claiming that what is presented on FOX is not legitimate.
How juvenile of you.
If only everyone would only watch Don Lemon and Madcow then everyone would actually know the facts....right?
Or should we only read WAPO and NYT.....right. Or only read the Guardian right?
Frankly pal I thought you were more "woke" than to tell people what to watch and listen to. This is after all still a free country right.
How 'free' would it be if you could stop FOX from broadcasting.
You just lost any respect I used to have for you.
Why would Trump want a chief of staff anyway?
Why would Trump want a chief of staff anyway?
For the same reason he hired Cohen, Pence, and Stormy (etc.): Someone to do the dirty work, and say "yes", and "you're the greatest," best 24/7.
Why would Trump want a chief of staff anyway?
For the same reason he hired Cohen, Pence, and Stormy (etc.): Someone to do the dirty work, and say "yes", and "you're the greatest," best 24/7.
From what I read in “Fear” he is his own chief of staff.