John Bolton Wants War With Iran

The apocalypse walrus has had a hard-on for Iran forever.

True - and well said.
Not only does the Walrus wants war, so does the much of the D party, R party, and all of the MSM.

I long for the days when the Ds were reflexively anti-war. Now they have become pro-war. Yet another proof that the two crime families are interchangeable.
 
I hope John Bolton dies soon.

Period.

He is a menace to the entire world.

He seems DESPERATE to start a war with just about anyone he can talk Trump into attacking.

He is a dangerous, blood-thirsty, neocon maniac.

do you have anything to say about the three mortars aimed at the US embassy?
 

White House Sought Options to Strike Iran
State and Pentagon officials were rattled by the request
im-45869

John Bolton, President Trumpā€™s national security adviser, had asked for military options to strike Iran.PHOTO: ANDREW HARNIK/ASSOCIATED PRESS

SHARE




    • ampEmail.png


By


Dion Nissenbaum

Updated Jan. 13, 2019 10:10 p.m. ET
President Trumpā€™s National Security Council asked the Pentagon to provide the White House with military options to strike Iran last year, generating concern at the Pentagon and State Department, current and former U.S. officials said.

The request, which hasnā€™t been previously reported, came after militants fired three mortars into Baghdadā€™s sprawling diplomatic quarter, home to the U.S. Embassy, on a warm night in early September. The shellsā€”launched by a group aligned with Iranā€”landed in an open lot and harmed no one.

But they triggered unusual alarm in Washington, where Mr. Trumpā€™s national security team led by John Bolton conducted a series of meetings to discuss a forceful U.S. response, including what many saw as the unusual request for options to strike Iran.

ā€œIt definitely rattled people,ā€ a former senior U.S. administration official said of the request. ā€œPeople were shocked. It was mind-boggling how cavalier they were about hitting Iran.ā€

The Pentagon complied with the NSCā€™s request to develop options for striking Iran, the officials said. But it isnā€™t clear if the proposals were provided to the White House, whether Mr. Trump knew of the request or whether serious plans for a U.S. strike against Iran took shape at that time.

im-47246

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, here visiting the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad this month, joined forces with national security adviser John Bolton to develop a more aggressive policy aimed at weakening the government in Tehran.PHOTO: ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS, PRESS POOL

Garrett Marquis, an NSC spokesman, said the body ā€œcoordinates policy and provides the president with options to anticipate and respond to a variety of threats.ā€

ADVERTISEMENT

ā€œWe continue to review the status of our personnel following attempted attacks on our embassy in Baghdad and our Basra consulate, and we will consider a full range of options to preserve their safety and our interests,ā€ he said.

Mr. Boltonā€™s request reflects the administrationā€™s more confrontational approach toward Tehran, one he has pushed since taking up the post last April.

As national security adviser, Mr. Bolton is charged with providing a range of diplomatic, military and economic advice to the president.

Former U.S. officials said it was unnerving that the NSC asked for far-reaching military options to strike Iran in response to attacks that caused little damage and no injuries.

Mira Ricardel, who was ousted as Mr. Boltonā€™s deputy in November, described the attacks in Iraq as ā€˜an act of war.ā€™PHOTO: ZACH GIBSON/BLOOMBERG NEWS

Last year, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis argued against strikes that might hit Russian and Iranian forces when Mr. Trump and his national security team were looking at ways to punish President Bashar al-Assad of Syria for a chemical-weapons attack, people familiar with the debate said. Mr. Mattis, who resigned in December amid a dispute with Mr. Trump over the presidentā€™s national security decisions, pushed for a more modest response that Mr. Trump eventually embraced.

ADVERTISEMENT

Grow up. The Bankers and the MIC want it, Bolton works for them.

oh----its "BANKERS" who aimed three mortars at the US embassy----
thanks for clearing that up
 
John Bolton Wants War With Iran

John Bolton is insane and should not be allowed within a thousand miles of any form of government power.


Only dimocrap scum and idiot, low-life liberturdian knuckle-dragers surround themselves with "Yes'' men.

A good leader surrounds himself with Hawks, Doves, conservatives and moderates of all stripes. And a liberal, a true liberal, here and there. No dimocrap scum. dimocraps are not liberals, they are scum

Listens to all of them and makes his/her own decision.

It's called 'Leadership'

All of you......

You should look into it sometime.

But it wouldn't do any good. You either have it, or you don't.

I see absolutely no understanding of leadership in this thread
 
As I recall Bill Clinton didn't request permission to bomb a freaking defenseless country in Europe that was no threat to the U.S. and the left loved it. Fake hysteria over Iraq is nothing but a smokescreen for the do-nothing democrat majority in congress.
 
John Bolton Wants War With Iran

John Bolton is insane and should not be allowed within a thousand miles of any form of government power.


Only dimocrap scum and idiot, low-life liberturdian knuckle-dragers surround themselves with "Yes'' men.

A good leader surrounds himself with Hawks, Doves, conservatives and moderates of all stripes. And a liberal, a true liberal, here and there. No dimocrap scum. dimocraps are not liberals, they are scum

Listens to all of them and makes his/her own decision.

It's called 'Leadership'

All of you......

You should look into it sometime.

But it wouldn't do any good. You either have it, or you don't.

I see absolutely no understanding of leadership in this thread
Oh blow it out your ass. No wait, you just did.
 

Forum List

Back
Top