Joe Walsh, no need for abortion to save woman's life

Abortion is the taking of the life of an unborn baby. If the baby is dead it is not an abortion. In what possible scenario would a woman need to kill her unborn baby to save her own life?
 
What are 'life saving abortions". How do they happen? Are lefties living in the 6th century like their jihad comrades where there is no medical treatment for the unborn and taking a life is the only alternative? The dirty little secret is the grinning drooling sex obsessed liberal males are the ones inventing scenarios that don't exist in order to force women to submit to abortion to absolve them of responsibility for their conduct..
 
Walsh represents my district. It's beyond arrogant what this man stated. First, he stated that no abortion no exception. His excuse is that women use the "my life is endangered" too loosely to justify and abortion whenever you want. I don't buy that BS response. He double down in stupidity when he stated well the only exception I would give is when BOTH the mother and child's life are in danger!

Can't stand the guy, but I will have to hold my nose and vote 3rd party!
 
LOL, this isn't the stone ages, I don't hear of a lot of women dying because they give birth.

you wouldn't hear about it because they'd get life-saying abortions to save them, if necessary.

d'uh.

I truly hate when election come down to social aspects like abortion. The economy is in disary, but all the talk for weeks in my district has been on abortion.

But I digress. Women's life in danger, rape and incest victims should be a no-brainer exceptions. Teenagers or when the child has birth defects should also be no-brainers.

But then again, I right-leaner that believe abortions should always be protected in the 1st trimester!
 
What scenario justifies a woman hiring someone to kill her own unborn baby to save her life? Maybe in 3rd world countries but If there are "life saving abortions" in this Country I'd like to hear it.
 
Well damn it, you lefties promote the issue so how the hell does a woman justify the scenario of hiring someone to kill her unborn child to save her own life? This is a concept that liberals have fooled themselves about for years so tell me how a woman's life is saved by killing the unborn life inside her.
 
Do a little reading whitehall.

New Study Examines Reasons Women Have Abortions

Needless to say, if you go to a fundie xtian site, they'll give you different information. My advice is to read both/all sides of the issue but the bottom line will always be - the only person who has the right to control a woman's body is the woman who owns it. Period.

A little aside ... under the Socialistic law (EMTALA) passed by Ronnie Ray-Gun, ALL Americans pay for a large percentage of all abortions performed, including illegal's. Under ACA, that would change.
 
Do a little reading whitehall.

New Study Examines Reasons Women Have Abortions

Needless to say, if you go to a fundie xtian site, they'll give you different information. My advice is to read both/all sides of the issue but the bottom line will always be - the only person who has the right to control a woman's body is the woman who owns it. Period.

A little aside ... under the Socialistic law (EMTALA) passed by Ronnie Ray-Gun, ALL Americans pay for a large percentage of all abortions performed, including illegal's. Under ACA, that would change.

Don't bull shit me luddney. Tell me again how a woman saves her life by hiring someone to kill her unborn child.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXWvKDSwvls]Joe Walsh - Life's Been Good - YouTube[/ame]

Irony.

Or is it? :dunno:



:evil:

pizza...
 
Tell me libs. How is a modern American woman ever in danger of losing her life because she is pregnant? It just doesn't happen.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top