He lied, and it's not an assumption, but based on evidence that the DoJ had against him. The FBI agent interpretation of his body language is not sufficient to prove innocence. That would be absurd.
refusing the pardon didn't make him look guilty. The Court is saying that accepting a pardon, imputes guilt....so there are many reasons why he might not want a pardon, including that and he can't be forced to take the pardon because it imputes guilt or admission of guilt
Where did you find the word "admission" in the case? You didn't! Don't use words that are not included to support your version. That's called "making shit up as you go".
I didn't say it did. Where did you see that his refusal of accepting the pardon made him look guilty?
That is what the word "impute" means! Read my posts before asking inane questions please.
Yes, accepting a pardon would impute guilt.....that's what the case states, not that not accepting imputes guilt
Well four years ago it was an admission of criminal activity
why did he pardon his family for any crime they may have committed in the last 10 yrs ?? you know why .. the truth will come out Chicom 6 .. it will be revealed .. and Garland wasn't going to look into the Briben families business dealings anyway ..but Bondi will ! though nothing can be done to hold them legally accountable now .. the American people deserve to be told the truth .. enjoy the next 4 yrs ..
Yid, was discussing Trump, not Joe. Trump does not have 2 brothers. His sister was not and is not facing investigation. You lost tract of what was being discussed. The only family member I remember Trump protecting, simply out of sense of family, was the father-in-law of his daughter. Donny was indeed the one, usually under investigation, as he called the shots and signed the papers.
Why do something: Why? Why not? Upside is guaranteeing family members would not have to lawyer up to stay our of jail or court on charges trumped up or real, with or without evidence, so he took them off the criminal liability table. Downside is if called as part of an investigation, they have limited or no 5th Amendment protections to avoid answering truthfull or face prosecution for lying under oath.
He was just trying to keep the new administration from doing to him what his people did to Trump. His folks gave new meaning to trumped up charges.
For the moment, looks like it worked.
the only party that weaponized the judicial system was the Dems four the last 8 yrs .. accountability and the truth is coming ..
MAGA?.... a real uncorrupted justice system would be the ones that would be after them not MAGA...... You've obviously got MAGA on the brain...MAGA is an simply an acronym for make America great again.
BS. You are a pretty naive kind of guy.
russia gate , the illegal fisa warrant , spying on Trumps campaign .. are just a few examples of the Dems lawfare .. or do you believe said actions were "just" and on the up and up ?
Who, Simp?
