Joe Biden Calls Georgia Election Law "Jim Crow"

[Viktor]

The President has no authority over state law. What the hell?

 

[Bush92]

The President has no authority over state law. What the hell?

Jim Crow ended long ago and yes, Coca-Cola does rely heavily on the Chinese market.

 

[Oddball]

Pinchijoe Xiden is too fucking senile for his own good.....Or the nation's.

 

[Votto]

It's not Jim Crow, it's Jim Eagle.

Everything that the DNC does not like is now Jimmy Eagle.

And with a Hitler salute no less

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Opposing protecting the Right to Vote is the same as being against the Right to Vote.
The Dems and the Corporations that are opposed to election integrity laws are fighting against the Right to Vote.

 

[dudmuck]

Opposing protecting the Right to Vote is the same as being against the Right to Vote.
The Dems and the Corporations that are opposed to election integrity laws are fighting against the Right to Vote.

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

 

[Muhammed]

All Biden knows about American history is.. nothing.


He practically brain dead.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Racial Jungle *Joe calling anything Jim Crow is hilarious.

 

[MeBelle]

 

[candycorn]

The President has no authority over state law. What the hell?

Correct. Non-story.

Tucker looks like he's got a sideways turd.

 

[excalibur]

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

The word 'democracy' does no appear in the Constitution. We are a Republic.

Protect the Vote is not suppression unless you think there should be no managing of the voter rolls.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Even the Washington Post gave Biden 4 Pinochios regarding the Georgia law.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Opposing protecting the Right to Vote is the same as being against the Right to Vote.
The Dems and the Corporations that are opposed to election integrity laws are fighting against the Right to Vote.

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

What vote was suppressed?

Snicker.............

 

[Quasar44]

The President has no authority over state law. What the hell?

Xiden is an autocrat and a fraud as is the entire Trotsky party

 

[Sunsettommy]

The President has no authority over state law. What the hell?

He is also stupid since it was his own political party that created and enforced Jim Crow.

 

[dudmuck]

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

The word 'democracy' does no appear in the Constitution. We are a Republic.

Protect the Vote is not suppression unless you think there should be no managing of the voter rolls.

James Madison made the distinction between a republic and a direct democracy exquisitely clear in “Federalist No. 14”: “In a democracy, the people meet and exercise the government in person; in a republic, they assemble and administer it by their representatives and agents. A democracy, consequently, will be confined to a small spot. A republic may be extended over a large region.” Both a democracy and a republic were popular forms of government: Each drew its legitimacy from the people and depended on rule by the people. The crucial difference was that a republic relied on representation, while in a “pure” democracy, the people represented themselves.

High-minded claims that we are not a democracy surreptitiously fuse republic with minority rule rather than popular government. Enabling sustained minority rule at the national level is not a feature of our constitutional design, but a perversion of it. Routine minority rule is neither desirable nor sustainable, and makes it difficult to characterize the country as either a democracy or a republic. We should see this as a constitutional failure demanding constitutional reform.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Opposing protecting the Right to Vote is the same as being against the Right to Vote.
The Dems and the Corporations that are opposed to election integrity laws are fighting against the Right to Vote.

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

How does the Georgia Law prevent Blacks or anyone else from voting. I eagerly await your response.

 

[Yarddog]

Opposing protecting the Right to Vote is the same as being against the Right to Vote.
The Dems and the Corporations that are opposed to election integrity laws are fighting against the Right to Vote.

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

Treating people like responsible adults, is not Suppression. Democrats on the other hand want to treat Black people like children, who cant find a driver's license number in order to get an absentee ballot 11 weeks before an election.

There is no integrity in pandering for votes by making one group constantly into a victim. I can see why the Dems do it though. It actually has worked for them.

 

[LuckyDuck]

Opposing protecting the Right to Vote is the same as being against the Right to Vote.
The Dems and the Corporations that are opposed to election integrity laws are fighting against the Right to Vote.

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

All Georgia is saying, is that anyone that wants to register to vote, has to present proper identification and when they show up to vote in the polls, present the identification.
Or.....are you saying that minorities are too stupid to obtain something as simple as proper identification? If so, that's the racism of low expectations.

 

[theHawk]

Opposing protecting the Right to Vote is the same as being against the Right to Vote.
The Dems and the Corporations that are opposed to election integrity laws are fighting against the Right to Vote.

Restricting the voting rights of people makes a mockery of the claim that there is democracy.

There's no integrity in suppressing voters.

The law doesn’t suppress voters.

New York State voting laws are more strict than Georgia’s. Are they suppressing the vote?