Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1

[Jroc]

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

No, that's complete nonsense. The beginnings of ISIS took place even before Bush was in power, just. However by the time Bush had left office what is now ISIS was quite a strong group, knowing what they wanted to do.

What Obama did, or didn't do, was to follow what had already been set in motion. The withdrawal of troops from Iraq had been decided by Bush. Obama couldn't go back on that. Also, ISIS then gained strength out of the Syrian conflict, which again, Obama couldn't have done anything about and which the Republicans wouldn't have done anything about.

Who is isis again? Nobody, Obama said so, until he didn't...You're just way too smart for me

 

[Unkotare]

Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons to annihilate Israel..... they'd get the job done just the same.

How, exactly?

 

[jillian]

78% of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country

The poll was taken among participants in an online panel of 501 respondents representing a statistical sample of the adult Jewish population in Israel. The poll, which was taken Wednesday, has a 4.2 percent margin of error.

The percentage saying that the deal would endanger Israel was 78%. Fifteen percent said it does endanger Israel and 7% did not know.

Seventy-one percent said the deal would bring Iran closer to a military nuclear capability. Twelve percent said it would distance Iran and 17% did not know.

Poll 78 of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country - Middle East - Jerusalem Post




New Survey of Jewish Americans Shows Opposition to Iran Deal Increases With More Knowledge of Arguments

The more Jewish Americans know about the Iran nuclear deal the less they like it, a new poll first seen exclusively byThe Algemeiner showed.

The survey of 1,034 people was conducted by Olive Tree Strategies on behalf of pro-Israel advocacy group The Israel Project. It claims a margin of error of 3 percent, and is the most extensive yet to be conducted on the issue. It comes as a wide array of U.S. Jewish groups have announced opposition to the deal, which is believed to endanger Israel and U.S. security.

In the survey, which was divided into three parts, respondents were first quizzed about their position on the deal based on their current knowledge without being provided any further information — 47 percent said they oppose it and 44 percent were in favor.

Asked if Congress should “approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran,” 40 percent said yes while 45 percent said no.

New Survey of Jewish Americans Finds the More They Know About Iran Deal the More They Oppose It Jewish Israel News Algemeiner.com

maybe you should try better sources....

The LA Jewish Journal survey released Thursday found that 48 percent of Jews support the deal while 28 percent oppose it and 25 percent hadn't heard enough to form an opinion. The survey described key parts of the deal, which lifts major economic sanctions against Iran in exchange for Iran restricting its nuclear program in a way that makes it harder for it to produce nuclear weapons.

Jewish Americans support the Iran nuclear deal - The Washington Post

 

[Jroc]

Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons to annihilate Israel..... they'd get the job done just the same.

How, exactly?

 

[jillian]

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

No, that's complete nonsense. The beginnings of ISIS took place even before Bush was in power, just. However by the time Bush had left office what is now ISIS was quite a strong group, knowing what they wanted to do.

What Obama did, or didn't do, was to follow what had already been set in motion. The withdrawal of troops from Iraq had been decided by Bush. Obama couldn't go back on that. Also, ISIS then gained strength out of the Syrian conflict, which again, Obama couldn't have done anything about and which the Republicans wouldn't have done anything about.

Who is isis again? Nobody, Obama said so, until he didn't...You're just way too smart for me

That isn't difficult....

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons to annihilate Israel..... they'd get the job done just the same.

How, exactly?

75 million Persians, 300 million Arabs, versus five million Jews. That math works...

 

[Jroc]

78% of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country

The poll was taken among participants in an online panel of 501 respondents representing a statistical sample of the adult Jewish population in Israel. The poll, which was taken Wednesday, has a 4.2 percent margin of error.

The percentage saying that the deal would endanger Israel was 78%. Fifteen percent said it does endanger Israel and 7% did not know.

Seventy-one percent said the deal would bring Iran closer to a military nuclear capability. Twelve percent said it would distance Iran and 17% did not know.

Poll 78 of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country - Middle East - Jerusalem Post




New Survey of Jewish Americans Shows Opposition to Iran Deal Increases With More Knowledge of Arguments

The more Jewish Americans know about the Iran nuclear deal the less they like it, a new poll first seen exclusively byThe Algemeiner showed.

The survey of 1,034 people was conducted by Olive Tree Strategies on behalf of pro-Israel advocacy group The Israel Project. It claims a margin of error of 3 percent, and is the most extensive yet to be conducted on the issue. It comes as a wide array of U.S. Jewish groups have announced opposition to the deal, which is believed to endanger Israel and U.S. security.

In the survey, which was divided into three parts, respondents were first quizzed about their position on the deal based on their current knowledge without being provided any further information — 47 percent said they oppose it and 44 percent were in favor.

Asked if Congress should “approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran,” 40 percent said yes while 45 percent said no.

New Survey of Jewish Americans Finds the More They Know About Iran Deal the More They Oppose It Jewish Israel News Algemeiner.com

maybe you should try better sources....

The LA Jewish Journal survey released Thursday found that 48 percent of Jews support the deal while 28 percent oppose it and 25 percent hadn't heard enough to form an opinion. The survey described key parts of the deal, which lifts major economic sanctions against Iran in exchange for Iran restricting its nuclear program in a way that makes it harder for it to produce nuclear weapons.

Jewish Americans support the Iran nuclear deal - The Washington Post

My source is much better. I also combined Israeli Jews and american Jews .... are you an Obama pet Jew?

 

[Mr. H.]

Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons to annihilate Israel..... they'd get the job done just the same.

How, exactly?

With 8 million of these.

Never underestimate the power of the Brotch Slap.

 

[gallantwarrior]

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

But really, American lives don't count for Obama. Even black American lives don't count, unless they vote D. Otherwise, illegal immigrant lives count for more.

They certainly didn't count in this Iran deal . Obama was afraid to even talk about freeing our American citizens being tortured in Iranian prisons. Funny he's very worried about freeing terrorist at Guantanamo

Since America, and by extension, Americans, are evil and privileged, we should expect less consideration than others, considering our privileged existence.

 

[Contumacious]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

TRUE.

BUT THERE ARE OTHER CO-FOUNDERS SUCH AS WARMONGERS EXTRAORDINAIRE (1) WAR "HERO" JOHN MCCAIN AND (2) LINDSEY GRAHAM.

.


.

 

[Jroc]

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

But really, American lives don't count for Obama. Even black American lives don't count, unless they vote D. Otherwise, illegal immigrant lives count for more.

They certainly didn't count in this Iran deal . Obama was afraid to even talk about freeing our American citizens being tortured in Iranian prisons. Funny he's very worried about freeing terrorist at Guantanamo

Since America, and by extension, Americans, are evil and privileged, we should expect less consideration than others, considering our privileged existence.

Oh that's right, we need the "smart people" like Obama to straighten things out

 

[Jroc]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

TRUE.

BUT THERE ARE OTHER CO-FOUNDERS SUCH AS WARMONGERS EXTRAORDINAIRE (1) WAR "HERO" JOHN MCCAIN AND (2) LINDSEY GRAHAM.

.


.

Yeah they're idiots, you're not going to get any defense of those morons from me, but they dont run the country

 

[Jroc]

78% of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country

The poll was taken among participants in an online panel of 501 respondents representing a statistical sample of the adult Jewish population in Israel. The poll, which was taken Wednesday, has a 4.2 percent margin of error.

The percentage saying that the deal would endanger Israel was 78%. Fifteen percent said it does endanger Israel and 7% did not know.

Seventy-one percent said the deal would bring Iran closer to a military nuclear capability. Twelve percent said it would distance Iran and 17% did not know.

Poll 78 of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country - Middle East - Jerusalem Post




New Survey of Jewish Americans Shows Opposition to Iran Deal Increases With More Knowledge of Arguments

The more Jewish Americans know about the Iran nuclear deal the less they like it, a new poll first seen exclusively byThe Algemeiner showed.

The survey of 1,034 people was conducted by Olive Tree Strategies on behalf of pro-Israel advocacy group The Israel Project. It claims a margin of error of 3 percent, and is the most extensive yet to be conducted on the issue. It comes as a wide array of U.S. Jewish groups have announced opposition to the deal, which is believed to endanger Israel and U.S. security.

In the survey, which was divided into three parts, respondents were first quizzed about their position on the deal based on their current knowledge without being provided any further information — 47 percent said they oppose it and 44 percent were in favor.

Asked if Congress should “approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran,” 40 percent said yes while 45 percent said no.

New Survey of Jewish Americans Finds the More They Know About Iran Deal the More They Oppose It Jewish Israel News Algemeiner.com

maybe you should try better sources....

The LA Jewish Journal survey released Thursday found that 48 percent of Jews support the deal while 28 percent oppose it and 25 percent hadn't heard enough to form an opinion. The survey described key parts of the deal, which lifts major economic sanctions against Iran in exchange for Iran restricting its nuclear program in a way that makes it harder for it to produce nuclear weapons.

Jewish Americans support the Iran nuclear deal - The Washington Post

The survey also found that Jewish Americans were generally more supportive of President Obama — 57 percent to 41 percent — but were more critical of his handling of foreign policy affairs.

The results differ somewhat from a similar survey released by the Los Angeles Jewish Journal last week, which found that 49 percent supported the deal while 31 percent opposed it. When asked if Congress should approve the nuclear agreement, 53 percent said yes, while just 35 percent said no. The Jewish Journal survey was conducted from a sampling of 501 Jewish adults and claims a margin of error of 6 percent.

 

[Jroc]

All Democrats too

About CNFI Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1"

American foreign policy isn't subject to public opinion polls, which is why this fails as a bandwagon fallacy.

 

[Jroc]

"Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1"

American foreign policy isn't subject to public opinion polls, which is why this fails as a bandwagon fallacy.

Obama is forcing others to have to deal with Iran a much more dangerous Iran...He's a clown and so is Kerry. Do you approve of Obama rushing to the security council before congress?

 

[gallantwarrior]

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

But really, American lives don't count for Obama. Even black American lives don't count, unless they vote D. Otherwise, illegal immigrant lives count for more.

They certainly didn't count in this Iran deal . Obama was afraid to even talk about freeing our American citizens being tortured in Iranian prisons. Funny he's very worried about freeing terrorist at Guantanamo

Since America, and by extension, Americans, are evil and privileged, we should expect less consideration than others, considering our privileged existence.

Oh that's right, we need the "smart people" like Obama to straighten things out

Absolutely! Who knows better than an anti-American, narcissistic, communist-leaning, know-nothing, done-nothing talking head, what is best for America and Americans who deserve nothing better than a third world existence.

 

[gallantwarrior]

"Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1"

American foreign policy isn't subject to public opinion polls, which is why this fails as a bandwagon fallacy.

Really? You must not be paying attention. American foreign policy may not be subject to AMERICAN opinion.

 

[Jroc]

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

But really, American lives don't count for Obama. Even black American lives don't count, unless they vote D. Otherwise, illegal immigrant lives count for more.

They certainly didn't count in this Iran deal . Obama was afraid to even talk about freeing our American citizens being tortured in Iranian prisons. Funny he's very worried about freeing terrorist at Guantanamo

Since America, and by extension, Americans, are evil and privileged, we should expect less consideration than others, considering our privileged existence.

Oh that's right, we need the "smart people" like Obama to straighten things out

Absolutely! Who knows better than an anti-American, narcissistic, communist-leaning, know-nothing, done-nothing talking head, what is best for America and Americans who deserve nothing better than a third world existence.

Yeah who are we to be any better than Iran?

 

[Contumacious]

But really, American lives don't count for Obama. Even black American lives don't count, unless they vote D. Otherwise, illegal immigrant lives count for more.

They certainly didn't count in this Iran deal . Obama was afraid to even talk about freeing our American citizens being tortured in Iranian prisons. Funny he's very worried about freeing terrorist at Guantanamo

Since America, and by extension, Americans, are evil and privileged, we should expect less consideration than others, considering our privileged existence.

Oh that's right, we need the "smart people" like Obama to straighten things out

Absolutely! Who knows better than an anti-American, narcissistic, communist-leaning, know-nothing, done-nothing talking head, what is best for America and Americans who deserve nothing better than a third world existence.

Yeah who are we to be any better than Iran?

WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER THAN IRAN - BUT WE ARE NOT

THE US DEPOSED IRAN'S DULY ELECTED PM

THE US SHOT DOWN IRANIAN CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT

THE US INSTALLED THE CRIMINAL SHAH WHO MURDERED MILLIONS OF IRANIANS

THE US INTERVENE IN IRAN INTERNAL AFFAIRS BY SPONSORING FOR TERRORISTS INSIDE IRAN


.