Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1

[Hossfly]

Why doesn't America have a powerful lobbying group in Israel demanding that Israel come do something about the cartels in Central and South America? Hmm?

It's only fair right?

They do Obamas leftist buddies invest the place

No they don't you nutjob. Please switch the places of the U.S. and Israeli flags in your signature, so it better reflects your loyalties.

​

 

[Jroc]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

 

[Hossfly]

What's Israel's opinion on the US raising its minimum wage?

lol

​

 

[Hossfly]

78% of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country

The poll was taken among participants in an online panel of 501 respondents representing a statistical sample of the adult Jewish population in Israel. The poll, which was taken Wednesday, has a 4.2 percent margin of error.

The percentage saying that the deal would endanger Israel was 78%. Fifteen percent said it does endanger Israel and 7% did not know.

Seventy-one percent said the deal would bring Iran closer to a military nuclear capability. Twelve percent said it would distance Iran and 17% did not know.

Poll 78 of Jewish Israelis say Iran deal endangers country - Middle East - Jerusalem Post




New Survey of Jewish Americans Shows Opposition to Iran Deal Increases With More Knowledge of Arguments

The more Jewish Americans know about the Iran nuclear deal the less they like it, a new poll first seen exclusively byThe Algemeiner showed.

The survey of 1,034 people was conducted by Olive Tree Strategies on behalf of pro-Israel advocacy group The Israel Project. It claims a margin of error of 3 percent, and is the most extensive yet to be conducted on the issue. It comes as a wide array of U.S. Jewish groups have announced opposition to the deal, which is believed to endanger Israel and U.S. security.

In the survey, which was divided into three parts, respondents were first quizzed about their position on the deal based on their current knowledge without being provided any further information — 47 percent said they oppose it and 44 percent were in favor.

Asked if Congress should “approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran,” 40 percent said yes while 45 percent said no.

New Survey of Jewish Americans Finds the More They Know About Iran Deal the More They Oppose It Jewish Israel News Algemeiner.com

EVERYONE knows that any Jew who is not a ZIONUT is not a real Jew and their views ought not to be posted in USMB.

I am going to recommend that this post be removed to the "Badlands"


.

​

 

[Jroc]

I started this thread to correct the false premise of Stat. Most Jews don't support Obama's deal

The Rabbi

Statistikhengst

 

[frigidweirdo]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I started this thread to correct the false premise of Stat. Most Jews don't support Obama's deal

The Rabbi

Statistikhengst

Then again you took it from an online poll.

The polls were taken in the Jerusalem Post and Maariv Hashavua, both of which are Israeli based newspapers. So, you can see that Israeli Jews don't support this, if you believe the poll which could have been manipulated quite easily anyway.

 

[Jroc]

Obama's pet Jews.. Jstreet was created 2009 to give Obama cover and be a counter to AIPAC

the anti-Zionist Zionists that have convinced “useful idiots” in the liberal Jewish community that Obama has effectively blocked Iran from a pathway to the bomb by releasing billions in Iranian funds, ending sanctions, and submitting to every demand the Iranians made with regard to inspections, which will require more notice than the Chicago police once gave Al Capone before a raid.

J Street’s president and founder, Jeremy Ben-Ami once described the organization as Barack Obama’s blocking back. So, it is not surprising that the organization proclaimed that the deal appeared to adhere to the criteria established by non-proliferation experts and it verifiably blocks Iran’s pathway to a nuclear weapon.

Who are these experts and what are their criteria? J Street does not say. J Street’s talking points and the administration’s are almost identical. Like the administration, J Street’s message is clear. All that stands between Iran and the bomb is Barack Obama’s deal with Iran

.

The Jewish Press J Street Fronts For Obama On The Iranian Deal

 

[Jroc]

I started this thread to correct the false premise of Stat. Most Jews don't support Obama's deal

The Rabbi

Statistikhengst

Then again you took it from an online poll.

The polls were taken in the Jerusalem Post and Maariv Hashavua, both of which are Israeli based newspapers. So, you can see that Israeli Jews don't support this, if you believe the poll which could have been manipulated quite easily anyway.

I report you decide

 

[PaintMyHouse]

How very odd. 78% of the world doesn't support Israel having nuclear arms, and I'm being generous on that...

 

[Jroc]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

 

[gallantwarrior]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Boooossshhh!!! Boooossshhh!!!
Damned that Bush guy, what a mess he's made these last eight years.

 

[Jroc]

How very odd. 78% of the world doesn't support Israel having nuclear arms, and I'm being generous on that...

Really? Where'd you get that info?...Too late

 

[gallantwarrior]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

But really, American lives don't count for Obama. Even black American lives don't count, unless they vote D. Otherwise, illegal immigrant lives count for more.

 

[Contumacious]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Boooossshhh!!! Boooossshhh!!!
Damned that Bush guy, what a mess he's made these last eight years.

YEP.


DOESN'T MATTER HOW YOU SPELLED HIS LAST NAME - WAR CRIMINAL BUSH FUCKED UP ROYALLY -


NOT SAYING BY ANY MEANS THAT OBAMA, - KENYAN FOR BUSH - HAS DONE ANY BETTER.


.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

How very odd. 78% of the world doesn't support Israel having nuclear arms, and I'm being generous on that...

Really? Where'd you get that info?...Too late

It's not info, it's an acknowledgement that what another nation does is none of you ******* business until they start crossing your goddamned border...

 

[BlackFlag]

Why doesn't America have a powerful lobbying group in Israel demanding that Israel come do something about the cartels in Central and South America? Hmm?

It's only fair right?

They do Obamas leftist buddies invest the place

No they don't you nutjob. Please switch the places of the U.S. and Israeli flags in your signature, so it better reflects your loyalties.

​

No I'm pretty fine with the Iran deal. It seems that it's the 75% of Israeli's who are butthurt.

Oh well. If only they weren't such massive failures at foreign policy they'd be able to have some kind of influence on the negotiations.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

No, that's complete nonsense. The beginnings of ISIS took place even before Bush was in power, just. However by the time Bush had left office what is now ISIS was quite a strong group, knowing what they wanted to do.

What Obama did, or didn't do, was to follow what had already been set in motion. The withdrawal of troops from Iraq had been decided by Bush. Obama couldn't go back on that. Also, ISIS then gained strength out of the Syrian conflict, which again, Obama couldn't have done anything about and which the Republicans wouldn't have done anything about.

 

[Jroc]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Obama is co founder of ISIS. He should have destroyed them when they were driving pick ups. He let them grow into what they are today. He's pathetic, Iran with 150 billion dollars to start is a bad thing. they kill American with that money .

But really, American lives don't count for Obama. Even black American lives don't count, unless they vote D. Otherwise, illegal immigrant lives count for more.

They certainly didn't count in this Iran deal . Obama was afraid to even talk about freeing our American citizens being tortured in Iranian prisons. Funny he's very worried about freeing terrorist at Guantanamo

 

[frigidweirdo]

Who wants to invade? who purposed that plan?

The right want to invade. I'll assume you mean proposed that plan, well, the right. Iran is another OPEC country that opposed the US and they want the leader gone.

2002 - OPEC Venezuela, a US supported and funded coup d'etat ultimately failed.
2003 - OPEC Iraq, Invasion.
2011 - OPEC LIbya, Gaddafi got rid of.

Venezuela's still there with it's govt that doesn't like the US. Sanctions were imposed recently.
Iran's still there. Sanctions have been in place for a while.

So regime change in Iran would be a bad thing?

So regime change in Iraq was a bad thing?

Saddam was not a nice guy. He did some pretty evil stuff. However look what happened after.

MORE people died because of Bush's policies than Saddam's policies. ISIS came about because of Bush's policies.

Going around pretending to be the world's police, doing things only for your own self interests without considering the consequences. Yes, that's a bad thing.

Boooossshhh!!! Boooossshhh!!!
Damned that Bush guy, what a mess he's made these last eight years.

Is this another argument that as soon as a president leaves office their policies no longer have an impact?

Jeez.