Meriweather
Not all who wander are lost
- Oct 21, 2014
- 20,466
- 4,395
- 165
Yes. It is about Israel.Another powerful prophesy is Isahiah 53
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. It is about Israel.Another powerful prophesy is Isahiah 53
So it’s what people claim he said, written as long as 100 years after the fact?Actually it is.
The text comes from eyewitness encounters with Jesus in the form of the 4 gospels.
Paul was also a real historical figure who wrote most of the NT.
The entire Bible is a valuable insight into the past, as most historical texts have been lost or not recorded at all since most of history has been lost forever.
Mark is the earliest of the Gospels written and probably sooner than what you claim since we have no way of proving they were not written by the eyewitnesses. All we can do is date the earliest known manuscript.
Nonetheless, the gospels are the earliest writings about Jesus, which makes them the most relevant since either the eyewitnesses wrote it or someone wrote about what they said.
Conversely, Mohammad coming along 500 some years later and rewriting the gospels after seeing "visions" is what is laughable. Mo actually said that God put some other poor soul on the cross to die in place of Jesus.
![]()
Scriptures say that Jesus is coming a Second timeDo you believe scripture or not?
I have never come across any proof that the NT was or began to be written by Saul of Tarsus. And even those 7 notes that are attributed to him - wouldn't constitute a proof towards what he claimed or supposedly witnessed.Incorrect. Paul of Tarsus died in AD 67, or perhaps AD 64.
Scriptures say that Jesus is coming a Second time
If that has already happened, when did it happen?
Paul was not a trouble-maker, and did not talk about Jesus with any intent to destroy Judaism. He took Jesus' teachings to the Gentiles.And Paul is the trouble-maker behind all this. Jesus never intended to destroy Judaism and create a new religion. That was Paul’s doing.
Christ is not the only prophet in the Bible to be treated this way. After all, prophets are usually sent by God to warn them about doing really bad things he feels compelled to judge them over in the hopes they might repent and avoid judgement. Moses was the exception as he was sent to lead them out of slavery. In addition, no one likes to be told they are ever wrong about anything, let alone about being wicked. The natural reaction is to kill them or cancel them, as the Left likes to do as any and all truth must be crushed!Yep. Muslims don't believe in original sin or blood sacrifice so they are horrified that the purest of the prophets died such a cruel and humiliating death.
Everyone had visions in those days.
Only in Acts and Hebrews does anyone refer to a "second coming." But only in a New Testament context (kingdom and judgment), as Christ had already come many times before.Scriptures say that Jesus is coming a Second time
If that has already happened, when did it happen?
What is the proof you have that someone other than Paul wrote Paul's epistles?I have never come across any proof that the NT was or began to be written by Saul of Tarsus. And even those 7 notes that are attributed to him - wouldn't constitute a proof towards what he claimed or supposedly witnessed.
No, Paul was a trouble maker. He hunted down Christians and murdered them.Paul was not a trouble-maker, and did not talk about Jesus with any intent to destroy Judaism. He took Jesus' teachings to the Gentiles.
Paul didn‘t tell Jews that Jesus was the son of G-d? And that he warned that the only way to the Father is through the son? Where did this dire warning come from then that those who “don’t accept Jesus go to hell” bit come from.Paul was not a trouble-maker, and did not talk about Jesus with any intent to destroy Judaism. He took Jesus' teachings to the Gentiles.
Off the top of my head I know that is not accurateOnly in Acts and Hebrews does anyone refer to a "second coming." But only in a New Testament context (kingdom and judgment), as Christ had already come many times before.
Christ never said he would come a second time. Only that he comes.
Christ foretold his judgment on Judea, and you don't know when Judea was judged? Its destruction is in the history books. Revelation describes it as judgment.
What is not accurate?Off the top of my head I know that is not accurate
No.Ever heard of Revelations written by John?
What did I discount?But thanks for discounting scripture you don't like based on the character assassination
Why blame Jesus, he was long dead when the New Testament was written.After all, it does say in the Christian Bible that “his blood is on Jews and all their generations“ along with other anti-Jewish verses.
Me? I do not. I think Jesus was basically a good man, with good intentions, and taught traditional Jewish values. His “do unto others” teaching, for example, can straight from Hillel.
The problem really started decades later when the NT was written. The claims that Jesus said “nobody gets to the Father except through me” is either outright false (no Jew would elevate himself like that) or misconstrued when he meant one must follow his teachings to see Gd.
That interpretation led to the idea the Gd is angry at Jews, has cursed them, and some of the other nasty stuff I’ve read right here on this forum. And the more Jews stuck with their religion that clearly outlined who the Messiah would be - Jesus didn’t fit - the more angry the 1st c Christians got with them. By the time John was written, they were in all-out assault mode.
Jesus certainly never intended any of this.
Do you have a Rasmussen poll showing that?Yes. Rather odd when Jesus, in his own time, had more who supported him than did not.
Every man must be confronted with this question, and that is, who and what is the man Jesus?Paul didn‘t tell Jews that Jesus was the son of G-d? And that he warned that the only way to the Father is through the son? Where did this dire warning come from then that those who “don’t accept Jesus go to hell” bit come from.
That is antithetical to Judaism, and anyone who believes that a mortal man is a deity is not a practicing Jew. If all Jews believed that, there would be no more Judaism.
Not true. Jews believe that people of other faiths can go to Heaven if they are good people. Christians of course take a “my way or the highway to hell” approach, and I believe Muslims feel the same.Why blame Jesus, he was long dead when the New Testament was written.
That attacks on Jews is the same with all monotheists.
For them to be right, every other religion must be wrong.
Christian, Muslim, Jew...All falling from the same cult tree.
Where is the proof, that he wrote or started to write the NT - around 50+ years after his own death?What is the proof you have that someone other than Paul wrote Paul's epistles?
What is the proof you have that someone other than Paul wrote Paul's epistles?Where is the proof, that he wrote or started to write the NT - around 50+ years after his death?
That the content of his 7 notes/letters were in-cooperated by some other into the NT - isn't the question.