What's the point in determining which of the two were greater? They were both great in their own way.
Muhammad was “great” if you think a mass-murdering warmonger is great
He did what he had to do to enforce his teachings. The Arabs were a superstitious people, apparently inclined towards fatalism. They would not have been able to maintain their warrior ardor in the long run without such commandments.
Let’s compare and contrast: Jesus exhorted to love your enemies and pray for your persecutors, OTOH, Muhammad had his adversaries assassinated and even genocided in the case of the Jews. He had a female poet Asma bint Marwan stabbed to death, nursing her child, merely for criticizing him in poetry. He’s quoted as boasting that the way to paradise is by the sword. OTOH, Jesus warned that he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.
Which was probably a teaching meant for people belonging to a higher discipline. The average person would look upon it as an unobtainable ideal, a teaching fit to gather dust in a library shelf. Teachers should uphold their own teachings. Why does no one heed James 3:1? And Jesus would not betray his own principle of "not casting pearls".
Not all of the Quran is a reliable testimony of Mohammed's actions, or his spoken words. Quran consists of hearsay, rumors, Arabic superstitions, possible statements made in historical contexts, and various interpolations.
Jesus preached to love your neighbor as yourself. Muhammad preached that only Muslims are liked by Allah. He killed his neighbors who disagreed
Paul preached that only Christians and Jews are loved by god. They likewise shun those who disbelieve.
On a personal level, Jesus did not marry while Muhammad had a veritable harem with 10+ wives at the same time, during a long stage of his life. Perhaps most notorious among his wives were a 6-yr-old child Aisha (Muhammad was in his 50s) and a former daughter-in-law Zaynab, a scandal that shocked the public as it constituted incest in Arab culture
Polygamy was necessary for the cause. How else would he obtain the manpower?
In terms of conduct, Muhammad and his followers robbed caravans in order to support themselves Indeed, the Koran entices Muslims with promises of “booty” and large-breasted maidens in paradise, sanctioned by “Allah” In fact, an entire book was needed to record Muhammad’s many raids, battles and wars, aptly called Book of Raids
The Quran promises an earthly, realistic, genuine paradise, similar to the Elysian Fields and Valhalla. None of these were rewarded for a belief, but for cultivating their skills and talents.
Jesus and his followers supported themselves by doing honest, modest work.
Jesus, sure. His so-called followers? Hardly.
The Islamic conception of god is agnostic (and thus more pious, by keeping the idea of god out of speculation and debate) and combated a Christian distortion of the trinity symbol, which can be found in ancient cultures.
Muhammad is quoted as sanctioning the rape of female slaves captured on such caravan raids and conflicts, and encouraged rape without birth control. Jesus did no such horrible thing
Funny that you should mention birth control, considering how the Church has always opposed it.
Muhammad was a warmonger who incited numerous battles including the first civil war, Medina and Mecca. Jesus was a man of peace who died for his beliefs while Muhammad murdered others for his beliefs
And Mohammed was successful in his task. The extent which Islam effected itself over the world has been greatly underestimated. It's certainly more far-reaching than Christianity's "progress". I have seen Christians claim that Islam was responsible for the Dark Ages, which is preposterous. The Mohammedan nations had access to the "neo-platonist" works and shone like a bastion of lucid reason and clarity.
Jesus did not come to bring to peace, but a sword. He was a fighter. Also, Jesus failed in his task of delivering the Jews and their non-Jewish proselytes from their delusions.