ForeverYoung436
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 6,050
- 1,226
- 245
Y-Kohen:That was in UN 181.
The Arabs violently rejected it in 1948.
That train has left the station, never to return.
Jerusalem is and will remain under Israel's sole control; exclusively as Israel's capital, and open to all, as long as they aren't violent and greedy and try to steal what isn't theirs.
Jerusalem is and will remain under Israel's sole control; exclusively as Israel's capital, and open to all, as long as they aren't violent and greedy and try to steal what isn't theirs
no its the israelis stealing houses and land in jerusalem and suburbs from arabs
violent and greedy,
very very very very greedy..........
you israelis......some of you
even with tourists
Nope. Not stealing; recovering what the Arabs stole.
Take for instance the neighborhood of Shimon HaTzaddik. Shimon HaTzadik is a Jewish neighborhood in Jerusalem, established around the Tomb of Simeon the Just, after whom it was named. The tomb and surrounding lands (a plot of approximately 18 dunams) was purchased in 1876 by the committee of the Sephardic community and the Ashkenazi Assembly of Israel.
Throughout December 1947, the Shimon haTsadiq and Nahalat Shimon neighborhoods, also close to the Tomb, on the way to Mount Scopus, came under attack. By January, 1948, all the Jews had been ethnically cleansed.
Subsequently, illegal Arab squatters took over the Jewish-owned properties.
Thank G-d, they are now being rightfully returned to their real owners.
This happened in many places. Unfortunately, it hasn't yet happened in Hebron, where the Jews were ethnically cleansed after a mass-murder of 67 of them in 1929. When these properties are returned to their rightful owners, it will be a great day; hopefully soon.
Would Mr. Tinmore support a "right of return" for Jews to their former homes in Hebron?