Jerusalem should be divided

That was in UN 181.

The Arabs violently rejected it in 1948.

That train has left the station, never to return.

Jerusalem is and will remain under Israel's sole control; exclusively as Israel's capital, and open to all, as long as they aren't violent and greedy and try to steal what isn't theirs.
Y-Kohen:

Jerusalem is and will remain under Israel's sole control; exclusively as Israel's capital, and open to all, as long as they aren't violent and greedy and try to steal what isn't theirs

no its the israelis stealing houses and land in jerusalem and suburbs from arabs

violent and greedy,

very very very very greedy..........

you israelis......some of you

even with tourists

Nope. Not stealing; recovering what the Arabs stole.

Take for instance the neighborhood of Shimon HaTzaddik. Shimon HaTzadik is a Jewish neighborhood in Jerusalem, established around the Tomb of Simeon the Just, after whom it was named. The tomb and surrounding lands (a plot of approximately 18 dunams) was purchased in 1876 by the committee of the Sephardic community and the Ashkenazi Assembly of Israel.

Throughout December 1947, the Shimon haTsadiq and Nahalat Shimon neighborhoods, also close to the Tomb, on the way to Mount Scopus, came under attack. By January, 1948, all the Jews had been ethnically cleansed.

Subsequently, illegal Arab squatters took over the Jewish-owned properties.

Thank G-d, they are now being rightfully returned to their real owners. :clap2:

This happened in many places. Unfortunately, it hasn't yet happened in Hebron, where the Jews were ethnically cleansed after a mass-murder of 67 of them in 1929. When these properties are returned to their rightful owners, it will be a great day; hopefully soon.

Would Mr. Tinmore support a "right of return" for Jews to their former homes in Hebron?
 
Y-Kohen:

Jerusalem is and will remain under Israel's sole control; exclusively as Israel's capital, and open to all, as long as they aren't violent and greedy and try to steal what isn't theirs

no its the israelis stealing houses and land in jerusalem and suburbs from arabs

violent and greedy,

very very very very greedy..........

you israelis......some of you

even with tourists

Nope. Not stealing; recovering what the Arabs stole.

Take for instance the neighborhood of Shimon HaTzaddik. Shimon HaTzadik is a Jewish neighborhood in Jerusalem, established around the Tomb of Simeon the Just, after whom it was named. The tomb and surrounding lands (a plot of approximately 18 dunams) was purchased in 1876 by the committee of the Sephardic community and the Ashkenazi Assembly of Israel.

Throughout December 1947, the Shimon haTsadiq and Nahalat Shimon neighborhoods, also close to the Tomb, on the way to Mount Scopus, came under attack. By January, 1948, all the Jews had been ethnically cleansed.

Subsequently, illegal Arab squatters took over the Jewish-owned properties.

Thank G-d, they are now being rightfully returned to their real owners. :clap2:

This happened in many places. Unfortunately, it hasn't yet happened in Hebron, where the Jews were ethnically cleansed after a mass-murder of 67 of them in 1929. When these properties are returned to their rightful owners, it will be a great day; hopefully soon.

Would Mr. Tinmore support a "right of return" for Jews to their former homes in Hebron?

Sure, I have said that before.
 
for the record----tinnie envisions jews in Hebron as DHIMMIS-----an interesting factoid in the history of the fascist imperialist filth he supports
is the fact that shariah shit society does DEPEND ON DHIMMIS-----economically and socially In fact the Shariah cesspit Saudi arabia harbors as almost 20% of their population NON MUSLIM pseudo dhimmis Since the dhimmi system does tend to DESTROY populations----in that the dhimmis either escape or die of the oppression------shariah shit pigs of saudi arabis IMPORT very impoverished indians and some from other lands out there like Indonesia ----to act as an underclass with no rights------TINNIE LOVES THE IDEA
 
The Torah tells us 36x not to mistreat a convert. But the convert DOES have to be sincere--not a Marilyn Monroe-type, who converts just for the sake of marriage.

See? My point exactly! The Torah has a word for not-real-Jews, they're called CONVERTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lmao:
 
The Torah tells us 36x not to mistreat a convert. But the convert DOES have to be sincere--not a Marilyn Monroe-type, who converts just for the sake of marriage.

See? My point exactly! The Torah has a word for not-real-Jews, they're called CONVERTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lmao:
They're called converts because they converted, and we have an obligation to treat them extra-specially, but they are real Jews.

Rabbi Meir Baal Ha Nes is thought to be a descendant of a proselyte. Rabbi Akiva was also a very well known son of converts. Indeed the Talmud lists many of the Jewish nation's greatest leaders, who had either descended from or were themselves converts. In fact, King David is descended from Ruth, a convert to Judaism.

Are you saying that King David wasn't a "real Jew"?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top