Ravi
Diamond Member
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
Your video shows the cop beating a man already down on the ground and then a dog repeatedly attacking the man.
But he died of heart failure!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
You only emphasize the cases that make cops look bad. I haven't noticed any examples of you condemning blacks who kill cops. If you have, maybe you could post one or two.Well, an unarmed suspect running away, subdued or shackled is "innocent." That is, if we are still adhering to the principle of "innocent until proven guilty." WHen a police kills under those circumstances, he has denied the victim due process under the law. That kind of killing is happening far too often.That doesn't mean that every dead body was an innocent victim.With all the dead bodies piling up your words ring hollow!
Are you saying that every single death was a case of cops shooting an unarmed suspect in the back? In your eyes, cops are all racist murderers and the suspects are all innocent victims. You're just as bad as the ones who always side with the cops, no matter what.
Are you accusing me of saying that every singe death was a case of cops shooting an unarmed suspect in the back? Look at what I said again; its right there in front of you.
I painstakingly described the situations that meet the criterion for unjustified homicide by police officers and still you missed it. You can't see the forest for the trees sometimes, SJ. What am I to do with you!
Well the dog appeared to maul a helpless person at the behest of it's master and that activity certainly added to the likelihood of death! It did nothing to detract from it!Do you think it was right for them to let the dog chew on his upper body around the face and neck?Sorry but that dog didn't "maul" anyone to death
Its a fucking animal that cant speak ,yet we think they are just like a human cop,they are not
I have no idea what took place, I simply responded that dog never mauled anyone to death...and it didn't.
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
Your video shows the cop beating a man already down on the ground and then a dog repeatedly attacking the man.
But he died of heart failure!
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
Your video shows the cop beating a man already down on the ground and then a dog repeatedly attacking the man.
But he died of heart failure!
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
Your video shows the cop beating a man already down on the ground and then a dog repeatedly attacking the man.
But he died of heart failure!
I'm pretty sure the the cause of death was reported as respiratory failure.
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
Your video shows the cop beating a man already down on the ground and then a dog repeatedly attacking the man.
But he died of heart failure!
I'm pretty sure the the cause of death was reported as respiratory failure.
There is enough support for the bad cops we see in those videos and pictures of late. However,there has to be a balance from another point of view. I stepped in to help fill that void.
The police shouldn't investigate the police. At least not the same force.There is enough support for the bad cops we see in those videos and pictures of late. However,there has to be a balance from another point of view. I stepped in to help fill that void.
And that is not a bad thing. Where you go wrong as an advocate is when you don't stick to the facts...like the fact that this guy was NOT mauled to death by the dog, NOR was his death due to heart failure.
Plus, you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions before the facts are revealed.
Let the police finish their investigation...get the facts...let's see all the evidence...THEN criticize the failures.
Oh no, Don't even go there. I was merely responding to the speculation of your comrades. Those weren't positive conclusions of how the man died. Only a medical examiner can legally determine that. Try a little harder to actually look at my whole post before commenting erroneously and making an ass of your self!There is enough support for the bad cops we see in those videos and pictures of late. However,there has to be a balance from another point of view. I stepped in to help fill that void.
And that is not a bad thing. Where you go wrong as an advocate is when you don't stick to the facts...like the fact that this guy was NOT mauled to death by the dog, NOR was his death due to heart failure.
Plus, you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions before the facts are revealed.
Let the police finish their investigation...get the facts...let's see all the evidence...THEN criticize the failures.
Police say he bit his own face and throat to death
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
Your video shows the cop beating a man already down on the ground and then a dog repeatedly attacking the man.
But he died of heart failure!
I'm pretty sure the the cause of death was reported as respiratory failure.
Most I could find was that he "later died in police custody."
Oh no, Don't even go there. I was merely responding to the speculation of your comrades. Those weren't positive conclusions of how the man died. Only a medical examiner can legally determine that. Try a little harder to actually look at my whole post before commenting erroneously and making an ass of your self!There is enough support for the bad cops we see in those videos and pictures of late. However,there has to be a balance from another point of view. I stepped in to help fill that void.
And that is not a bad thing. Where you go wrong as an advocate is when you don't stick to the facts...like the fact that this guy was NOT mauled to death by the dog, NOR was his death due to heart failure.
Plus, you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions before the facts are revealed.
Let the police finish their investigation...get the facts...let's see all the evidence...THEN criticize the failures.
Why does this video seem so different from the edited video in the OP?
Your video shows the cop beating a man already down on the ground and then a dog repeatedly attacking the man.
But he died of heart failure!
I'm pretty sure the the cause of death was reported as respiratory failure.
Most I could find was that he "later died in police custody."
"White went into respiratory distress and died when he arrived at a hospital, officials said."
WATCH NJ man dies in police custody after arrest - NY Daily News
Police say he bit his own face and throat to death
Oh no, Don't even go there. I was merely responding to the speculation of your comrades. Those weren't positive conclusions of how the man died. Only a medical examiner can legally determine that. Try a little harder to actually look at my whole post before commenting erroneously and making an ass of your self!There is enough support for the bad cops we see in those videos and pictures of late. However,there has to be a balance from another point of view. I stepped in to help fill that void.
And that is not a bad thing. Where you go wrong as an advocate is when you don't stick to the facts...like the fact that this guy was NOT mauled to death by the dog, NOR was his death due to heart failure.
Plus, you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions before the facts are revealed.
Let the police finish their investigation...get the facts...let's see all the evidence...THEN criticize the failures.
Then why are we not waiting for the autopsy report and the entire video before rushing to any "speculative" judgement?
The police investigation is not always the most accurate one.... but it's generally the only one that counts. Must be nice!There is enough support for the bad cops we see in those videos and pictures of late. However,there has to be a balance from another point of view. I stepped in to help fill that void.
And that is not a bad thing. Where you go wrong as an advocate is when you don't stick to the facts...like the fact that this guy was NOT mauled to death by the dog, NOR was his death due to heart failure.
Plus, you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions before the facts are revealed.
Let the police finish their investigation...get the facts...let's see all the evidence...THEN criticize the failures.
YOU already have, teapercrit.Oh no, Don't even go there. I was merely responding to the speculation of your comrades. Those weren't positive conclusions of how the man died. Only a medical examiner can legally determine that. Try a little harder to actually look at my whole post before commenting erroneously and making an ass of your self!There is enough support for the bad cops we see in those videos and pictures of late. However,there has to be a balance from another point of view. I stepped in to help fill that void.
And that is not a bad thing. Where you go wrong as an advocate is when you don't stick to the facts...like the fact that this guy was NOT mauled to death by the dog, NOR was his death due to heart failure.
Plus, you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions before the facts are revealed.
Let the police finish their investigation...get the facts...let's see all the evidence...THEN criticize the failures.
Then why are we not waiting for the autopsy report and the entire video before rushing to any "speculative" judgement?
Which can be caused by many things, including drug overdose and severe hit to the chest or the head.
ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Symptoms and Treatments