Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MAGArats are SCRAMBLING
MAGArats are SCRAMBLING
Those emails weren’t made up by Dems and they’re just the tip of the icebergYeah, Trump and the victim who committed suicide and who had nothing to gain by saying so. Not one single person has implicated Trump in wrongdoing. All we have are Democrats making stuff up and smearing Trump.
Oh boy! You sure have him this time!Those emails weren’t made up by Dems and they’re just the tip of the iceberg
Exactly.Oh boy! You sure have him this time!

I wouldn't trust anything they say as far as I can throw them.The New York Times
So they say? How did they just "obtain" it after all these years?has obtained an email message from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell dated April 2, 2011,
Ah Oh, another one of those famous allegations from a non-existent person!in which Epstein allegedly wrote that a specific, unnamed victim
"Referring" to? Meaningless."spent hours at my house with him," referring to Donald J. Trump.
In the U.S. federal prison system, the claim is generally correct: Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policy requires that inmates with a
sex offender status be housed in at least a low-security prison, which precludes them from being in a minimum-security facility, unless a specific waiver is granted.
The email that substituted "victim" for "Virginia" is a baldfaced lie.Those emails weren’t made up by Dems and they’re just the tip of the iceberg
A Pedo and a man who is compromised to Pooptin is setting in the WH.
My guess is that he did some things that weren't illegal but would wreck the careers of most politicians, and will essentially get away with it because he's not held to any normal behavioral standards at all. Par for the course. Meh.MAGArats are SCRAMBLING
There is plenty of reason to think my way if you listened to the arguments in the SC Hearing the other day, as I did...You hope, with no rational or factual reason to do so.
Quantify this. Be sure to use direct quotes, rather than your understanding.There is plenty of reason to think my way if you listened to the arguments in the SC Hearing the other day, as I did...
All victims names were redacted....duh! There was no deception in not exposing victims.... Trump chose to break that promise and release a victim's name for his own perceived political or personal purpose....wonder how Trump was able to get to UN redacting her name? They were Congressional files?No he's not. Why are you making shit up?
The White House is saying the name they deceptively redacted on the Epstein email they released to get you loons worked up is Virginia Giuffre.
Because of her testimony under oath, posted in this topic several times.Why would Trump think releasing Virginia's name would help him?
Because she's dead. Nothing to protect.All victims names were redacted....duh! There was no deception in not exposing victims.... Trump chose to break that promise and release a victim's name for his own perceived political or personal purpose....wonder how Trump was able to get to reacting her name?
I repeat, They redacted to hide the fact that she had already cleared Trump, under oath in court.Why would Trump think releasing Virginia's name would help him? Why do you think it helps him, verses any other Epstein victim named?
Her testimony under oath, is that she has never seen Trump at any of Epstein's homes.Because of her testimony under oath, posted in this topic several times.
Because she's dead. Nothing to protect.
The Committee got these emails unredacted. They redacted to hide the fact that she had already cleared Trump, under oath in court.
I repeat, They redacted to hide the fact that she had already cleared Trump, under oath in court.
Care, haven't you figured out that these assholes in your party are playing you. They received these emails months ago. And they just happen to release them on the day their party caves on the 40 day shutdown and Trump reopens the government? Come on, I thought you were smarter than that.

You should read the testimony again. And then again.Her testimony under oath, is that she has never seen Trump at any of Epstein's homes.
She met him only at Mara Lago after she was hired and he was cordially friendly, nice to her.
How does that help Trump within the Maxwell and Epstein email conversation?
The House Oversight committee ruled by Republicans got 23,000 subpoenaed documents from Epstein's estate on Sept 8th....less than 3 weeks later, they were in SHUT DOWN and the House was sent home. 23000 documents, some several pages each, had to be gone through and victims names etc, had to be redacted.Because she's dead. Nothing to protect.
The Committee got these emails unredacted. They redacted to hide the fact that she had already cleared Trump, under oath in court.
I repeat, They redacted to hide the fact that she had already cleared Trump, under oath in court.
Care, haven't you figured out that these assholes in your party are playing you. They received these emails months ago. And they just happen to release them on the day their party caves on the 40 day shutdown and Trump reopens the government? Come on, I thought you were smarter than that.